| Ilena Rose 2006-09-29, 9:28 pm |
| On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:36:35 -0600, Ilena Rose <BIA@mundo.com> wrote:
>http://humanticsfoundation.com/coverup.htm
George said:
>What you have never discussed is why women want to have their breasts enlarged volunarily. Even if it is somewhat dangerous, which remains unproven, it is a voluntary procedure which no one need undergo. Now, if cancer causes a breast to be removed, a
re you against reconstruction too?
>What is your gripe anyway? You want to lecture all women?
>What you have never discussed is why women want to have their breasts enlarged volunarily.
1. There are an abundance of reasons want to have implants ...
augmented by the lies of the breast implant industry who denies their
dangers. Some of the hype even compares getting implants to colouring
hair ... absurd denial of the potential complications.
> Even if it is somewhat dangerous, which remains unproven, it is a voluntary procedure which no one need undergo.
It has been proven in hundreds of thousands of women that implants are
dangerous ... you are disinformed.
>Now, if cancer causes a breast to be removed, are you against reconstruction too?
Women who receive implants post mastectomy have even more
complications and re-surgeries.
>What is your gripe anyway? You want to lecture all women?
My gripe is this medical device is exceedingly dangerous and can
damage a woman's health to such a degree, she may never recover. If
the FDA gives "safety approval" ... the US government will then join
the breast implant makers and their PR teams in lying to the public
about "safety." There is no definition of safety that includes the
problems caused by breast implants in hundreds of thousands of women.
Indeed, I want to raise awareness of these dangers to as many women as
possible.
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org
|