| PeterB 2006-08-02, 8:26 am |
|
0:-> wrote:
> PeterB wrote:
re[vbcol=seagreen]
of[vbcol=seagreen]
re[vbcol=seagreen]
's[vbcol=seagreen]
do.[vbcol=seagreen]
ent.[vbcol=seagreen]
st[vbcol=seagreen]
ce[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Your nonsense and breaks with reality notwithstanding, you have simply
> babbled this time out.
The babbling was all yours. I just made it wiggle.
> The bottom line?
You're an idiot. And a chemo apologist.
> We only know about this case what the media allows us to know with the
> slant the journalists put on it at the demands of their editors. Who, of
> course, answers to the publisher, who of course makes his nut from what
> the advertisers pay, who pay what the circulation indicates.
I'm sure you know all about the PR side of things. Why wouldn't you?
> The answer here, of course is that the journalists will have to milk
> this for every farthing of pathos they can wring out of it.
Sort of like you, in defense of chemo and one of the most profitable
failures in modern medicine: chemotherapy.
> Hence, you may not have all the facts.
I wouldn't be consulting with you either way.
> Tell you what, I'm tired of you, so I'm hanging you out to dry.
Yes, we noticed how you ran from my earlier comments. Hopefully,
readers will see you for the cowardly chemo pusher you are.
> I don't
> have time for blatant liars...
You don't have time for yourself? That's never good.
> , but I'll give you some time when the case
> is finally closed and it is PUBLISHED, so we may comb the case for
> details withheld from us by the press.
You mean you would rather be dealing with the final version of spin
once it's been carefully spewed. The idea that you rely on the media
for what you think could explain a lot, however, in this case it
doesn't. You're stupid for completely different reasons.
> Trying cases in the newsgroups based on missing evidence can get stupid
> fast, no?
You're proof.
> Don't let the door hitcha.....
I don't use doors.
of[vbcol=seagreen]
more[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
> --
> "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
> to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
> contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else)
|