| Jan Drew 2006-08-01, 4:40 pm |
|
"0:->" <pohaku.kane@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:V7CdnS_EdPcd8lLZnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@scnresearch.com...
> PeterB wrote:
>
> If you "knew" I couldn't provide it what would be your logic in demanding
> it?
>
>
> I most certainly did.
>
>
> Thousands? Scientific? All of them?
>
>
> Fool's Gold looks like Gold. That doesn't make it Gold. And one can find a
> lot of it, compared to Gold, quite easily.
Hmm. Who was it that mentioned *Non Sequitur*?
>
> The quality, not the quantity, of research is the question. I've found
> tons of "independent" research that's usable as toilet paper, and little
> else.
>
>
> You won't prove your claims.
>
>
> Trite.
>
>
> "Treatment centers?" what would they have to do with research?
>
> And do you honestly want to try and sell that "non-profit" research is not
> funding by those with agendas?
>
> Where DO they get funded from?
>
> You're a laugh riot, child.
>
> When you aren't running goal posts all around the field, you are
> spiralling in upon yourself with that glib nonsense above.
>
> It LOOKS good at first casual read, but upon examination it turns out to
> be a pile of stinking innuendo.
>
> And my sources were not "marketing" efforts.
>
> 0:->
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
> to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
> contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else)
|