| cathyb 2006-07-31, 8:28 am |
|
Jan Drew wrote:
> "cathyb" <cathybeesley@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:1154324168.019638.154830@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> Which part did you not understand?
> The above is clear as a bell.
No, Jan, it's not. I have no idea what you're wittering on about, as
usual.
>
> Sure you don't. Liar.
Whilst it's certainly flattering that you insist on endowing me with a
qualification I don't have, Jan, I still don't have a PhD. But thanks.
>
> *Ms Dalefield, apparently a toxicologist who
> lives in the States.*
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/misc...16ec71135971762
> Thurs, Jul 21 2005 4:47 pm
> Is "Cathy B" Rosalind Dalefield?
> ... member of Quackwatch's Rag-tag Posse?
>
> http://www.ratbags.com/posse/whoarewe.htm#Dalefield
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/misc...55c2412867e7b35
> Fri, Jul 22 2005 12:45 pm
> Is "Cathy B" Rosalind Dalefield?
> ... member of Quackwatch's Rag-tag Posse?
>
> http://www.ratbags.com/posse/whoarewe.htm#Dalefield
>
> Ilena Rose" <Ilena.R...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
> Excuses noted.
>
> My posts are VERY clear.
> To any intelligent person.
No, they aren't Jan. Whilst your statements immediately above are at
least decipherable, although appallingly written, for the most part
your messes of cut'n'paste nonsense interspersed by enigmatic
non-sentences are far from clear.
>
>
>
> Yeah, yeah. Blah Blah.
>
> Your usual diversions.
>
> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
>
> You have been exposed with this repeating.
>
> Searched all groups Results 1 - 17 of 17 for your query (0.13
> seconds
>
>
> "Everyone knew it was a lie." author:cathybeesley@optusnet.com.au
>
> Been covered. YOU still bring it up over and over. HarASSer.
>
>
You see, Jan? That was a lie that you told. I know it's killing you
that we all know you're a liar, but you'll just have to deal with it.
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> LOL! LIAR!!!!!!
No, Jan. Yet again, you scream "LIAR" with no evidence whatsoever. I
note you're avoiding the fact that the e-mail proved I couldn't
possibly be the same person as Rosalind Dalefield. Not that anyone else
ever thought I was.
>
> Prove it. Post it.
But, Jan, *you* posted it. Are you so utterly stupid you can't find it
in your own post, today?!
>
> There is nothing to notice--except you claim. Which you have NOT proven.
I'm sorry, are you really denying you posted the site, when you did it
today, in this thread?!
Dear me, Jan appears to be more off her trolley than usual today.
>
> Where?
>
> I know you have difficulty reading English, Jan, but
>
> In my post--WHERE?
Bless. Jan apparently can't remember or find the things she's posted in
one thread in one day. Perhaps that's why she can't construct an entire
coherent sentence: by the time she's halfway through, she's forgotten
the beginning.
>
> You STILL have not posted it!
>
> Oh, really?
>
> Your hole is getting deeper and wider.
>
> You claimed you did not know who Rosalind was.
>
> The above shows you LIED.
Actually, I said she was a toxicologist working in the US. Your memory
is particularly poor today, Jan. BTW, that means I didn't lie. You,
however, did. Again.
>
> By the way, please be aware that Rosalind Dalefield is a toxicologist
>
>
>
>
> Blatant lie as shown above.
>
> FACT: I asked you.
>
> <snip repeated crap and diversion>
It's quite unkind to call someone thanking you "crap", Jan.
Thank you for providing a list of some of the people you've accused me
of being--without ever having provided a single good reason for doing
so.
And do remember in future: more than one person lives in Australia, and
more than one person has four children.
And try not to be so mendacious in future.
[vbcol=seagreen]
|