| Jan Drew 2006-07-31, 8:28 am |
|
"cathyb" <cathybeesley@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:1154324168.019638.154830@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> Jan Drew wrote:
>
>
> You're still not making sense, Jan.
Which part did you not understand?
The above is clear as a bell.
>
>
> I've no idea whether a Rosalind has, but I certainly don't have a PhD.
Sure you don't. Liar.
*Ms Dalefield, apparently a toxicologist who
lives in the States.*
http://groups.google.com/group/misc...16ec71135971762
Thurs, Jul 21 2005 4:47 pm
Is "Cathy B" Rosalind Dalefield?
.... member of Quackwatch's Rag-tag Posse?
http://www.ratbags.com/posse/whoarewe.htm#Dalefield
http://groups.google.com/group/misc...55c2412867e7b35
Fri, Jul 22 2005 12:45 pm
Is "Cathy B" Rosalind Dalefield?
.... member of Quackwatch's Rag-tag Posse?
http://www.ratbags.com/posse/whoarewe.htm#Dalefield
Ilena Rose" <Ilena.R...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1122002400.668527.322670@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Is this 'comprehensibile' to you ...
> are you Rosalind Dalefield hiding behind the alias of "Cathy B."?
> http://www.ratbags.com/posse/whoarewe.htm#Dalefield
>
>
> No. To point out that many of your posts are incomprehensible. Try
> harder.
Excuses noted.
My posts are VERY clear.
To any intelligent person.
>
>
> Gosh, you managed to pick up your spelling error, but none of the
> others.
Yeah, yeah. Blah Blah.
Your usual diversions.
>
>
> Oh, Jan. This is a lie, told by a practised artist:
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
You have been exposed with this repeating.
Searched all groups Results 1 - 17 of 17 for your query (0.13
seconds
"Everyone knew it was a lie." author:cathybeesley@optusnet.com.au
Been covered. YOU still bring it up over and over. HarASSer.
>
> Jan Drew wrote:
>
> (of the article "Stupid Skeptic Tricks"):
>
> "I posted it with permission from the author."
>
> Everyone knew it was a lie.
>
> And look what the author said:
>
> 'As the author of "Stupid Skeptic Tricks," I can state unequivocally
> that Jan Drew never requested or received permission to reprint or
> repost the article from me. I was doing a bit of ego-surfing, and her
> dishonesty pissed me off.'
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Well, we certainly don't believe you, Jan, for just that reason.
> Peter, however, who has never been shown to lie, actually provided the
> e-mail in question.
LOL! LIAR!!!!!!
>
>
> You already posted it, you fool. Along with the date.
Prove it. Post it.
>
>
> Well, yes. Didn't you notice?
There is nothing to notice--except you claim. Which you have NOT proven.
>
>
> In your post.
Where?
I know you have difficulty reading English, Jan, but
> surely you can understand your own posts?
In my post--WHERE?
You STILL have not posted it!
>
>
> You already posted it Jan, here in this thread.
Oh, really?
Your hole is getting deeper and wider.
You claimed you did not know who Rosalind was.
The above shows you LIED.
By the way, please be aware that Rosalind Dalefield is a toxicologist
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
> Well, of course, everyone here has developed some practice in laughing
> at you Jan. How could we not, given the calibre of your posts? The
> occasion on which you claimed I was Rosalind because I used "Er..." is
> only one of many.
>
>
> Thank you for showing just a few of the people you've accused me of
> being, Jan.
Blatant lie as shown above.
FACT: I asked you.
<snip repeated crap and diversion>
>
|