| Jan Drew 2006-07-30, 9:24 pm |
|
Rosalind/Stella/cathyb wrote:
Jan, you've written an utterly incomprehensible pile of crap and lies
> in appalling English again (do please translate "You are up date of
> her latest aliases").
Proving me correct.
You can't figure that out?? With a Ph.d.
Leaving out the word *to* is NOT *appalling English*.
It is noted. You NEVER critisize Mark Probert. Who holds the record here
for spelling errors, etc.
>
> Jan Drew wrote:
>
> Jan, you've written an utterly incomprehensible pile of crap and lies
> in appalling English again (do please translate "You are up date of
> her latest aliases").
>
> By the way, please be aware that Rosalind Dalefield is a toxicologist
> working in the US; she worked for the CSIRO, years ago, apparently, in
> Geelong. About 1800 km (hint: that's quite a long way, Jan. In lots of
> countries, they'd be speaking a different language) from Brisbane,
> where I live.
>
> But then Peter proved to you some time ago (with an e-mail he received
> from her in the States at the same time I was posting here) that we
> couldn't be the same person.
LOL! We are supposed to believe a proven liar?
And surely you are aware that the post of
> Ms Dalefield that you provided was from 2001?
No. Are you?
Do post it.
And that her address is
> elsewhere listed as Gaithersburg on the site you provided?
I provided?
Where?
Do post it.
>
> Remember how we all laughed when you claimed I must be her because I'd
> used "Er..." at the beginning of a sentence?
I remember the many times *we* [the gang*] laughed at me.
That is their expertise.
>
> Poor Jan. Stupid one moment, an obsessive liar the next.
Oh? You have no proof of that. Just your version and whoever
you choose to believe.
Remember when/where you said this:
You have made an accusation, and should provide some evidence to back
it up. Remember the presumption of innocence? You can't just go around
making accusations with no foundation, and then expect your victim to
come up with proof that he didn't do whatever you'd made up.
You have made this particular accusation many times, and provided not
one shred of evidence.
I wonder what
> new identity she'll come up with for me next?
I don't need to provide *new*. The old is sufficient.
Rosalind akaStella, aka/ cathyb.
Do post proof the above claims.
Oh, and while you are at it.
It wrote:
She has accused me of
> being Peter Bowditch because we both live on a titchy little island
> called Australia, albeit 1000 km apart, then his wife and daughter for
> good measure
A blatant lie.
I never accused. I asked a question.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc...g/2f939194f9...
Jun 11 2005
Subject: Cathyb Can provide NO proof
Cathyb wrote
People have already seen where you *accused* me,
And so, for the final time:
LadyLollipop wrote:
<snip justification of the unjustifiable>
> You have failed to answer my question.
Haven't seen it before.
> Are you Peter's wife??
No
http://groups.google.com/group/misc...g/6f99ae15f4...
Jun 10 2005
Subject: This Wouldn't Bother You, Would It Cathy B-Bowditch?
Are you Peter's wife?
LL/Jan
http://groups.google.com/group/misc...g/4a51b6f34e...
Jun 10 2005
Are you his daughter, wife??
You have failed to answer my question.
Are you Peter's wife??
Now it says
>Well, thank you for showing that I was telling the truth, Jan
Blatant lie. It has not told the truth from day one..when it appear on this
ng.
|