| Kathleen 2006-05-08, 1:30 am |
| This person has an opinion without doing any
of the scientific research.
Must be something in the videos- like directions
to the PubMed and Patent database, to find out
for yourselves if what I am saying is true or not.
ALSO, read the PROJO article on Patrick Kennedy
linked from my homepage.
THAT person says the same thing THE DATA IN THE
VIDEO SAYS, about these drugs.
So, you can argue with the resident nitwit here-Rick
or you can look this data up for yourselves.
REMEMBER KIDS- WHAT'S A VALID TERM?
It must pass Scientific Validity Rules, which are
well- established.
Kathleen
http://actionlyme.
Rick Morris wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Gosh,
>
> I am making a statement about actionlyme.org and the balance of it's
> presentation of the facts. Pros and cons are available for pretty much any
> subject under the sun. It would just be nice to see both sides, rather than
> the carefully chosen "anti" position. When that happens, it is called
> propaganda.
>
> I know the evils of "BigPharma" (they use propaganda too) but whether the
> medications they sell are beneficial is a totally different subject than how
> they try to make profits, fairly or unfairly. The actionlyme.org site seems
> to want to connect the two subjects, using the business practice to judge
> the effectiveness of the medications. That's propaganda. That is my point.
>
>
>
> --
> Propaganda is a specific type of message presentation directly aimed at
> influencing the opinions of people, rather than impartially providing
> information.
> Wikipedia
>
>
>
> On 5/7/06 1:29 PM, in article
> 1147026595.873905.167970@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com, "Greegor"
> <Greegor@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
|