Home > Archive > Politics and Medicine > February 2006 > Re: Hey! Look how stupid I am!!!! {Part two}





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Hey! Look how stupid I am!!!! {Part two}
mockingbird

2006-02-28, 11:01 am

if people knew the truth about borreliosis in the US and associated
scandals, I am 100% convinced that the governments of israel and the
united states would be overthrown by their respective peoples, or at
least major government and health reforms would be implemented to stave
off such a reaction. the peoples of these nations are living an
illusion, a lie.

In europe, you need 3 bands on IgG for a positive blot; dogs in America
need 2. yet for some reason american citizens need 5.

In europe, the ratio of symptomatic to asymptomatic cases is estimated
at 1:8.

In the US, it is 1:1. This is based on the european standards of
serology interpretation, and studies performed before Bush the 1st who
undoubtedly possesses a miniscule penis ordered the unconstitutional
cover-up.

He bailed out on the american people just as he bailed out on his
crewmates during WW2 leaving them to plummet to their deaths in a
pilotless plane. He is a weak, pathetic, grasping, evil piece of shit
human pile of shit married to a bug-eyed monstrous cunt who mothered a
litter of alcoholic coke snorting mentally retarded draft-dodging
cretins. Praise jesus.

To help lift the veil of illusion, I suggest that all who are
interested or effected by the disease read scientific studies performed
on veterinary populations and european human populations.

Allen Steere, Gary Wormser, John Nowakowski, etc. are simply lying
their shit-filled heads off when they publish on asymptomatic
populations in the US. They are only publishing this shit as a
protective prelude to anticipated civil and/or criminal legal action,
or possibly to establish yet another illusional foundation for further
prevarications, since no scientist familiar with the subject, in europe
OR america, reading these journals is going to do anything other than
laugh at their absurd trash. Most of their "asymptomatic" subjects were
asymptomatic to begin with. The blot patterns simply changed over time.
Many of the patients, had they been in europe, or dogs in america, had
blots which would have been scored as positive serology to begin with.
Yet steere and nowakoski considered these blots to be uninfected blots.
LMAO. I don't think they believe this shit either.

The steere standard is a complete fraud and was implemented in order to
artificially reduce the incidence of disease and cut out the vast
numbers of individuals who suffer from non-arthritic manifestations.
The decision was made at some level that these individuals, who form
the MAJORITY of borreliosis patients, could be labeled as suffering
from chronic fatigue or fibromyalgia, depression, panic attacks,
munchausens syndrome, or related non-existent garbage can diagnoses. It
is unquestionably the most horrific crime ever committed by the US
government against its own people. It is the worst scandal in american
history. Put simply, it was and is a holocaust, a sentencing to mental
physical and emotional hell, for hundreds of thousands and even
millions of americans and their families. Many have died directly from
the disease or its complications, and many have committed suicide when
unable to find help. No one knows how many suicides and lyme-rage
related murders have been committed. That number is probably huge in
and of itself.

Here's Bettina Wilske, in March 1992, on cross reactive proteins of Bb.
What they did in this study was perform a series of Western Blots using
Borreliosis serum directed against a spectrum of bacterial lysates:

"According to our results, special attention should be given to
p100,p41, OspA and pC {ospC} as candidate antigens for more specific
antibody detection {on western blots}"

why did wilske et al come to this conclusion?

Because when borreliosis serum is directed against bacterial lysates,
the ONLY cross reactivity seen is against spirochetal antigens. More
specifically, B. Hermsii, Treponema phagedensis, and leptospiral
spirochetes.

B. hermsii infection is incredibly rare, even in endemic areas such as
the western US. Only a handful of cases are seen each year. Moreover,
it is impossible to confuse relapsing fever with lyme, since relapsing
fever presents with acute symptoms including high fever and massive
spirochetemia, and the diagnosis is ALWAYS made by culturing
spirochetes from the blood. A similar argument against leptospirosis
can be made; actually, this disease hardly exists in the United States
outside of travelers from tropical areas.

Syphilis, btw, doesn't have a 41kDa band when blotted against
borreliosis serum. It does have very weak reactivity at 40kDa {common
to many bacteria}, but this cannot be confused with a strong band at 41
kDa.

Which brings us to T. phagedensis. There can be reactivity at 41 kDa,
but this is very, very weak. Wilske commented on this in her study,
that the reactivity if seen at all is very weak. Moreover, T.
phagadensis is an agent of ULCERATIVE gingivitis. From other studies,
it can be seen that even patients with advanced ulcerative oral disease
do not always have a measurable antibody response to oral spirochetes,
let alone Bb cross reactivity.

The whole thing is a XXXXING LIE.

There is NO NEED for the 41-g standard. 41kDa is good enough, it's
probably 95%+ sensitive and 90%+ specific for Bb EXPOSURE and
asymptomatic/ latent infection.
moreover 41g is simply too small a fragment and will miss many cases.
the p41 64-311 standard is far better, if you want to get anal.

The problem they had is that not everyone with an IgG to 41kDa will
become symptomatic. Many will, no doubt, due to patient genotype and
pathogen genotype. Who really knows? No one knows. It's the single most
bizarre, most poorly understood human pathogen known.Furthermore, vast
numbers are infected. Over TEN MILLION in the US.

Lyme disease is not a disease, it is a syndrome and an imaginary one at
that. The disease is borreliosis, with a huge spectrum of
presentations.

The whole problem could have been largely solved in the early 90's by
eradicating deer in endemic areas. Why didn't they do this?

I believe that Bush the 1st signed off on the coverup in order to
prevent political damage to the US. The US COULD NOT acknowledge the
severity of the disease, or the differences between s.s. and european
strains, without ultimately being exposed as all of it being the result
of a bioweapons mishap. We can't kill the deer without having to admit
the problem and ultimately the source of the problem. And at that
point, the US has ZERO credibility in bombing and invading other
nations using WMDs as an excuse. Post cold war, the neocons decided
they wanted to use our military to effect change in the middle east and
other locales using the WMD excuse.

Their plan was to use a vaccine. Once a vaccine is widely used, they
will then break down and admit to chronic lyme and neuropsychiatric
lyme, which will of course still be rare entities requiring 16 thousand
bands on WB. The entire holocaust was planned many years ago. These
people know what they are doing. They have for the past 15 years been
managing the disease in the exact same manner that adolf eichmann
managed the death trains to auschwitz. They are a bunch of XXXXing
hitlers.

Copyright 2003 - 2009 pahealthsystems.com