| awthrawthr@yahoo.com 2006-10-19, 4:27 pm |
|
Jeff wrote:
> <awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1160846582.234654.231430@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Why don't you provide evidence that the treatments that the ACS supports are
> worse than the alternatives?
>
> Please don't cite your out-of-date book.
The earlier stats in my book help to demonstrate just how far ahead
Revici's contributions were...so rather than being out of date, they
serve to accentuate the difference.
For instance, when x-rays from 1949 show clear evidence of bones
growing back and the disappearance of tumors...and American Cancer
Society gets advanced copies of this evidence prior to the release of
Revici's book...and writes an article in response condemning Revici
without referring to the evidence they were given...then you know that
for over five decades that the ACS is willing to lie. Each passing year
adds to the condemnation. In fact, the ACS continues their lie, which
compounds the lie.
>Real evidence, with scientific
> backing, please.
How about untreatable tumors that are subsequently gone...is that
scientific enough for you! Naw, you pefer a number rather than the
actual forensic evidence.
|