Home > Archive > Politics and Medicine > October 2006 > Re: NYTIMES: Childhood Cancer Survivors Face Increased Risks Later





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: NYTIMES: Childhood Cancer Survivors Face Increased Risks Later
awthrawthr@yahoo.com

2006-10-17, 9:34 pm


Mark Probert wrote:
> awthrawthr@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Didn't you mean to say that you are unable to find a single iota of
> evidence. Sure you did. Just to let you know, I never expected a
> straight answer from you.


[sarcasm alert] That's a good one, Mark! You want me to prove to you
that cancer treatments kill people. Tha'ts too funny, Mark! Who in
their right mind would ever think cancer treatments such as chemo,
radiation and surgery kill people...I've never heard of such a thing!

>
>
> The operative words are could be. After that, you need to prove causal
> relationship. You can't, and you will continue to weasel.


[more sacrasm alert, which will continue throughtout] My goodness...are
you trying to claim that since chemo doesn't kill 100%, then the claim
that chemo can be fatal is false?? In that case, you are so
right...chemo fails to kill people 100% of the time...my mistake, it's
only some of the time that it kills them outright.

>
>
> You would not know the truth if it were inserted proctoscopically, which
> is the most direct route to your "thinking center".


That there is some original material you've got, Mark. Maybe you should
offer your services to Jay Leno.

>
>
> Your ability to weasel out of a direct answer is truly pathetic. I have
> seen far better weaselers.


That's another really funny line, there, Mark.

>
>
>
> I see. So, do feel free to document how they have changed.
>
> Maybe
>
> I usually look at the survival rates for individual cancers, not cancer
> as a whole. Again, you weasel.


The improvements in individual cancer 5-year survival rates is due to
earlier detection, not from better treatments.

>
>
> Incorrect. With the clock started earlier, survival is made more likely
> in many cancers, like breast cancer.


Thank you for admitting that...it's the earlier detection.

>
>
> Do try to actually prove that supplements affect the cure rate. Your
> sunrise rant is merely a red herring.


Charles Simone, M.D. has done a meta-study of over 100 studies. It was
found that cancer patients who use dietary supplelements have TWICE the
survival rate as those who don't. Checkmate. (You sure did walk into
that one...did it hurt before the 'lights' went out?)

Copyright 2003 - 2009 pahealthsystems.com