| awthrawthr@yahoo.com 2006-10-15, 4:28 pm |
|
Jeff wrote:
> <awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1160885745.180393.310990@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> <...>
>
>
> You can provide peer-reviewed research that shows Revici's methods work.
> Otherwise, you don't have a claim. If the treatment were so good, you would
> expect that the Revici clinic would do the proper studies and have them
> published, so that other patients could benefit.
>
> However, they haven't.
You're sounding like a broken record. There will be no studies. And
they aren't necessary. After JAMA published libel against him, his
papers could not get a fair review. It's as if your college statistics
course has hypnotized you into thinking it is the be all and end all of
all evidence.
BTW, I've given you a statistic. Provide another doctor who has cured 5
Stage IV inoperable cancer patients for five years or longer. You have
hundreds of thousands to choose from. Give us one.
>
> http://www.quackwatch.org/01Quacker.../OTA/ota05.html
You've just disqualified yourself from consideration. The quackwatch
website is replete with factual errors regarding the Revici method. For
starters, he never used coffee to treat a patient. Just about the whole
thing is wrong except for the spelling of his name.
>
> Unless you are able to make substantial claims to back your case, I will
> have no further comment to your posts in this thread.
I've made a substantial claim...now you go find one doctor who has
cured five Stage IV inoperable cancer patients. There isn't one...not
one in the entire US who uses conventional medicine.
|