Home > Archive > Politics and Medicine > October 2006 > Re: NYTIMES: Childhood Cancer Survivors Face Increased Risks Later





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: NYTIMES: Childhood Cancer Survivors Face Increased Risks Later
awthrawthr@yahoo.com

2006-10-15, 2:29 am


Jeff wrote:
> <awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1160880658.314582.91160@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Again, show us the studies that demonstrate that the treatment work. A bunch
> of anecdotes are just that. Anecdotes.


Wrong. There are anecdotal accounts that surpass many studies as to the
value that they offer.

For instance, if there is no doctor...out of the thousands of
physicians...in the US using conventional medicine who has cured 5
inoperable brain tumors, then you have a benchmark...and extraordinary
benchmark.

With that standard being proven to be impossible to achieve, if someone
exceeds that number by using a different method, then no study is
necessary...because the difference is self evident.

Revici did this and a whole lot more. Heck, I can point to 4 brain
tumor cases just in the 1980's. And lung cancer patients and pancreatic
patients, and on and on. He surpassed the benchmark many times over.

Revici is dead, so there won't be any studies...but his record far
surpasses any arbitrary requirement you or others might have.

Dr. Brenner, FACR, provided an excellent example in the foreword of my
book. One day a former metastatic lung cancer patient he had treated
pallitively returned a year later to his office cancer free. Brenner
had practiced radiation oncology for over 30 years in a huge practice
with six board certified radiation oncologists. He had never seen a
recovery like that...ever. Had any of his partners seen something like
that, he would have known about it.

Yes, it's an anecdotal account. It's also so extraordinary that it
becomes a classic case study. Revici had a huge number of classic case
studies like that. What other doctor can say that?

The answer is ZERO. 100,000 other physicians and yet none of them or
perhaps all of them combined if you added up all their best cases of
stage IV inoperable cancer patients who eventually became cancer free
for five years...would be able to match Revici's.

How do I make this claim? Look at the literature, add up all the
spectacular cases of Stage IV inoperable cancers from a physician pool
of several hundred thousand doctors. They probably won't equal what
Revici achieved.

Copyright 2003 - 2009 pahealthsystems.com