| LadyLollipop 2005-09-30, 1:15 pm |
|
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:5yE_e.2184$Ge5.888@fe10.lga...
> PeterB wrote:
>
> No, it is not a reason for that. I use Google News Alerts on thimerosal,
> measles, mumps, pertussis, etc. and have been reading the news from
> England where Wakefield did his evil. The uptake of vaccines dropped, and
> the incidence of disease increased.
>
>
> And, Rich said, and I agree, that that in the overall scheme of things,
> the profit made by the pharmaceuticals on vaccines is so relatively small
> in comparison to their overall financial picture, that no comapny would
> risk marketing an ineffective AND unsafe product.
>
> I personally have no doubt that there are those companies that compare
> risk and cost and then proceed to market something that is of questionable
> safety.
>
> Vaccines are NOT in that category.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/artic...MNG7M9TG681.DTL
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health...-problems_x.htm
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=6193
http://www.909shot.com/History/Newsletters/nlr1296.htm
http://focus.hms.harvard.edu/2005/M...s_disease.shtml
|