| lisasawitch 2005-08-19, 9:02 am |
| You were accused tried and convicted did not appeal and never have had
anyone but you declare yourself innocent or the charges false.
Shut up already. And answer the questions below.
You're a DELIBERATE LIAR!
KATHLEEN IT AIN'T FUNNY STOP THE LIES YOU LYING LIAR!
Featured in Court & Police
Kathleen Dickson
Published on 5/8/2004
Kathleen Dickson, 46, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Thursday
with being a fugitive from justice.
=A9 The Day Publishing Co., 2004
Featured in Court & Police
Kathleen Dickson
Published on 5/9/2004
Kathleen Dickson, 45, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Friday
with second-degree harassment and threatening.
=A9 The Day Publishing Co., 2004
ANSWER THE QUESTIONS KATHLEEN
Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change
the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you
answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about
McSweegan or former Governor Rowland and all your typical diversionary
crap anyway.
PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're
selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple
newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who
need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you
are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid
schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your
own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be
about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in
life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people
from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely
people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little
kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and
CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and
homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.
How do you like them apples?
Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer
the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If
there's a question yOU don't understand which is hard to believe given
your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.
Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore
this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your
silence will be construed as admissions to all OF the facts listed as
questions.
PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You
have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to
these questions. Straight answers.
REPOST:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group.../browse_thre...
Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is
actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what
you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.
Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has
been--YOU.
Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is
just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what
Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.
Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject.
I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions
for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now
dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the
questions for your answers:
Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?
You CLAIM there is a court Order prohibiting you from criticizing the
government. Post it!
And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts
kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all
here.
Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing
Jessica Gauvin?
Did you flee to Canada?
Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF
when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your
kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal
that?
Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?
Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs
whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?
Come on specifically what isn't true?
You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,
admit or deny?
Now you say you've proven you're innocent.
In what court were your convictions overturned?
In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly
were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?
Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?
You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in
CT?
Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?
Admit or deny you feld to canada?
Admit or deny you were convicted?
Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?
Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you
never filed an appeal did you?
So who's lying about what?
Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what
the court thought was it?
Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer
at the time when you had "retired" years before?
Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally
registered charity?
Kathleen you're the liar here.
Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is
crazy, not you?
And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of
your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting
on the internet than any real accomplishments?
http://groups-beta.google.com/group...wse_thread/thr=
ead/961a6d2015746801/41df41b82df2d0a1?hl=3Den#41df41b82df2d0a1
Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above.
Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back
and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU
are!
And see kathleen's post advocating cyberterrorism:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group...wse_thread/thr=
ead/f4f83960053d8933/cbae392e9ba84df7?q=3DEWALD&rnum=3D3&hl=3Den#cbae392e9b=
a84df7
This is a federal crime. A SERIOUS Federal Crime. So do what you think
is right! By the way this is almost certainly a violation of her
probation/parole.
Kathleen Dickson
860-599-5451
23 Garden St., Pawcatuck 06379
Remember, she's provided everyone with contact information for the FBI
in New Haven: FBI New Haven 203-777-6311
Here's a way to contact the FBI via the internet:
FBI Tips and Public Leads
https://tips.fbi.gov/
While the FBI continues to encourage the public to submit information
regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, this form may also
be used to report any suspected criminal activity to the FBI.
FBI Tips and Public Leads
Your First Name
Your Middle Name
Your Last Name
Your Phone
Your Email
Your Street 1
Your Street 2
Your Suite/Apt/Mail Stop
Your City
Your State
Your Country
Your Zip Code / Route
Please describe your information:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group...wse_thread/thr=
ead/507b61f6eeaa6a31/540c8012ea93f24d?q=3Dcyber&rnum=3D1&hl=3Den#540c8012ea=
93f24d
kathleen May 3, 1:45 pm hide options
Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
From: "kathleen" <kathleen.dick...@snet.net> - Find messages by this
author
Date: 3 May 2005 10:45:05 -0700
Local: Tues, May 3 2005 1:45 pm
Subject: FBI Cyber Crime information
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse
http://www.fbi.gov/cyberinvest/cyberhome.htm
http://www.ic3.gov/
National White Collar crime center:
http://www.nw3c.org/----------------------------
The FBI plays two very important roles in cyberspace. First, it is the
lead law enforcement agency for investigating cyber attacks by foreign
adversaries and terrorists. The potential damage to the United
States'national security from a cyber-based attack includes
devastating interruptions of critical communications, transportation,
and other services. Additionally, such attacks could be used to access
and steal protected information and plans. The FBI also works to
prevent criminals, sexual predators, and others intent on malicious
destruction from using the Internet and on-line services to steal from,
defraud, and otherwise victimize citizens, businesses, and communities.
The mission of the Cyber Division is to:
coordinate, supervise and facilitate the FBI's investigation of those
federal violations in which the Internet, computer systems, or networks
are exploited as the principal instruments or targets of terrorist
organizations, foreign government sponsored intelligence operations, or
criminal activity and for which the use of such systems is essential to
that activity;
form and maintain public/private alliances in conjunction with enhanced
education and training to maximize counterterrorism,
counter-intelligence, and law enforcement cyber response capabilities;
and
until such time as a final decision is made regarding the future role
and location of the National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC),
the FBI will direct and coordinate the Center's mission to protect the
Nation's critical information infrastructure and other key assets.
Federal Bureau of Investigation - Contact Us
http://www.fbi.gov/contactus.htm
The FBI can be contacted twenty-four hours a day, every day. Here's
how:
FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Call (202) 324-3000 or write to the following address:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J=2E Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
Local FBI Offices
See Your Local FBI Office for the addresses and phone numbers of our
field offices nationwide-as well as links to their web sites.
FBI Offices Worldwide
If you are outside the United States and need to reach the FBI, call
the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate office.
Reporting Crime
To report a violation of U.S. federal law or provide a possible tip in
a criminal or counterterrorism investigation, use our electronic FBI
Tips and Public Leads form. Or contact your local FBI field office or
closest international office.
To report suspected espionage activity, see our Awareness of National
Security Issues and Response (ANSIR) page.
Been victimized by an online scam? File a complaint with the Internet
Crime Complaint Center run by the FBI and the National White Collar
Crime Center.
kathleen wrote:
> Whitewashing the Protection of Terrorists on US Soil
>
> Nafeez Ahmed
>
> Exclusive: Well known Mid-East expert questions omission of "Able
> Danger" by 9/11 Commission
>
> Exactly one year before 9/11, a highly classified US Army intelligence
> unit known as "Able Danger" had already pinpointed four of the 9/11
> hijackers. Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, Khalid Almidhar, and Nawaf
> Alhamzi were identified as members of a "Brooklyn" al-Qaeda cell on a
> detailed chart that included visa photographs. The Army unit was
> established by the Special Operations Command in 1999 by Gen. Hugh
> Shelton, then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
>
> The startling revelations first surfaced in late June, from
> Congressman. Curt Weldon (R-PA), Vice-Chairman of the House Homeland
> Security and Armed Services Committees, citing at least three active
> military and intelligence officials. The story eventually made the New
> York Times headlines, thrice, the latest report on Tuesday quoting Lt.
> Col. Anthony Shaffer, who was a liaison with the Able Danger unit at
> the Defense Intelligence Agency. Lt. Col. Shaffer gave on the record
> confirmation of the details revealed by Rep. Weldon, but further stated
> that Able Danger had scheduled three meetings in the summer of 2000
> with the FBI's Washington field office to share the findings and
> recommend to "take out that cell."
> Advertisement
>
> Those meetings were unilaterally cancelled by military lawyers at the
> Defense Department's Special Operations Command, and information
> sharing was blocked.
>
> The stated reason? Apparently, Atta and his comrades were in the US on
> "valid entry visas" - the law, it was claimed, bars US citizens and
> green-card holders from being targeted for intelligence-collection
> operations. Although, this does not include visa holders, the law
> supposedly provided a disincentive for sharing intelligence with law
> enforcement. "We were directed to take those 3M yellow stickers and
> place them over the faces of Atta and the other terrorists and pretend
> they didn't exist," said another defense intelligence official.
>
> Terrorists don't get and keep visas:
>
> The explanation was disingenuous. "Mohammed Atta and his terrorist
> cohorts were clearly and factually established as Al-Qaeda
> functionaries of a foreign government [Taliban of Afghanistan] with
> Al-Qaeda itself being a Designated Foreign Terrorist Organization
> (DFTO)", noted Sean Osborne of the US Army's Program Executive Office -
> Command, Control, Communications Tactical (PEOC3T) within the Special
> Project Office (SPO).
>
> "Designated terrorist's do not receive and retain 'green card' status,
> and any card so previously attained would have to be considered a
> priori fraudulent, null and void," Osborne stated.
>
> In fact, there are 13 exceptions within Executive Order 12333 allowing
> intelligence-collection on US Persons and bona-fide green card-holders,
> including for Counterintelligence purposes, allowing for collection of
> against individuals reasonably suspected of involvement in
> international terrorism, as well as their associates.
>
> Atta:
>
> But all this is academic. Mohamed Atta was never a green-card holder.
> Worse still, he never had a valid entry visa. On the contrary, in
> January 2001, Atta was permitted reentry into the United States after a
> trip to Germany, despite being in violation of his visa status. He had
> landed in Miami on January 10 on a flight from Madrid on a tourist visa
> - yet he had told immigration inspectors that he was taking flying
> lessons in the US, for which an M-1 student visa is strictly required.
>
> Essentially, Atta had entered the US three times on a tourist visa in
> 2001, although INS officials knew the visa had expired in 2000, and
> Atta had violated its terms by taking flight lessons. So Atta was
> illegal - and the Defense Department lawyers who blocked the FBI from
> accessing the Able Danger data were lying. So the question remains: why
> was the Able Danger report prevented by the DoD from circulating in the
> US intelligence community?
>
> According to the 9/11 Commission report, Atta was not identified as a
> potential terrorist until after 9/11, and Almidhar and Alhamzi were
> only identified in late 1999 and 2000 by the CIA - but the FBI was
> apparently only notified in summer 2001. The Able Danger story
> demonstrates that the 9/11 Commission's narrative is false - reliable
> information that four al-Qaeda members were operating within a cell to
> plan a terrorist attack was available, but its circulation was
> inexplicably obstructed by the government.
>
> The Able Danger story, however, is only the latest confirmation that
> the intelligence community had extensive information on many of the
> 9/11 hijackers years prior to 9/11.
>
> The Miami Herald (6/7/02) reported that the National Security Agency
> had "monitored telephone conversations before Sept. 11 between the
> suspected commander of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks and
> the alleged chief hijacker." Anonymous NSA officials told the Herald
> that "the conversations between Khalid Shaikh Mohammed" - the
> operational mastermind of 9/11 - "and Mohamed Atta were intercepted",
> while Atta was in the US. How much was gleaned about the plot was not
> disclosed. But The Independent (9/15/02) reported that Khalid Sheikh
> Mohammed "received a telephone call from Mohammed Atta on 10
> September", in which he gave Atta "the final approval to launch the
> strikes." Like Able Danger, these facts were also apparently considered
> "historically irrelevant" by the Commission.
>
> Las Vegas is not a Muslim destination:
>
> Other facts were also considered irrelevant by the Commission. For
> instance, the fact that numerous reports in the San Francisco
> Chronicle, South Florida Sun Sentinel, Los Angeles Times, and numerous
> other sources, confirmed from multiple eyewitnesses that the hijackers,
> including Mohamed Atta, had "engaged in some decidedly un-Islamic
> sampling of prohibited pleasures in America's reputed capital of moral
> corrosion," in Las Vegas and elsewhere - behavior that just doesn't
> quite fit with al-Qaeda's puritan salafist ideology of strict adherence
> to Islamic tenets.
>
> More Terrorist Training:
>
> Or the reports that emerged in Newsweek, the Washington Post, and the
> New York Times that at least "five of the alleged hijackers received
> training in the 1990s at secure US military installations", including
> Mohamed Atta who attended International Officers School at Maxwell Air
> Force Base in Montgomery, Alabama.
>
> The US Air Force later argued that they "might not" be the same
> persons, due to some "biographical discrepancies" - which of course
> were never revealed to the public. When Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL)
> tried to investigate, shocked at the possibility that Pensacola Naval
> Air Station could have hosted and trained Saeed Alghamdi, Ahmed
> Alghamdi, among others, he was told by the FBI - after several weeks -
> that they were trying to work through something "complicated and
> difficult."
>
> Daniel Hopsicker, a former Producer at PBS Wall Street Week and
> investigative report at NBC News, decided to investigate. After
> pressing an official at the Defense Department, he was finally told: "I
> do not have the authority to tell you who attended which schools" - in
> other words, terrorists did train at secure US military installations,
> but who trained where is none of our concern. It is difficult to avoid
> the conclusion that these people were, for reasons undisclosed,
> protected.
>
> Attempts to silence Able Danger revelations:
>
> Such facts have fallen into the memory hole. There is currently an
> active attempt to achieve the same results for the Able Danger
> revelations. The 9/11 Commission's attempts to explain its omission of
> the revelations from its final report were riddled with contradictions.
>
> First the Commission completely denied any knowledge of Able Danger.
> Allegedly, the staff and panel members simply hadn't been told. When it
> became clear, from Weldon's military intelligence sources, that the
> Commission had been officially briefed on the Able Danger report, they
> relented, and claimed instead that they simply didn't take the material
> seriously, because it had already established that the hijackers had
> not been identified at that early time.
>
> When this explanation started to falter, it was stated that the
> briefing made no mention at all of Mohamed Atta, and thus was not
> considered to be of value to the investigation.
>
> The Whistleblower:
>
> But Lt. Col. Shaffer has now come on public record confirming that he
> had personally "provided information about Able Danger and its
> identification of Mr. Atta in a private meeting in October 2003 with
> members of the Sept. 11 commission staff when they visited
> Afghanistan", according to the newspaper of record. Former
> Commissioners suddenly emerged to chorus the insistence that they had
> never been briefed so specifically about Able Danger, that the material
> was vague, and made no mention of Atta.
>
> The backtracking and side-stepping of the now disbanded Commission
> hardly lends its position further credibility.
>
> Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is author of four books, including:
>
> The War on Truth: 9/11, Disinformation and the Anatomy of Terrorism
> The War on Freedom: How and Why America was Attacked, September 11,
> 2001
> Behind the War on Terror : Western Secret Strategy and the Struggle for
> Iraq
>
> He is Executive Director of the Institute for Policy Research &
> Development in London, and a Doctoral Candidate in International
> Relations at the university of Sussex, Brighton.
> http://rawstory.com/news/2005/White...n_of__0818.html
> 11 Comments
|