Home > Archive > Politics and Medicine > August 2005 > Re: kathLOON DickSON Pawctucket CT 23 garden street LIAR TERRORIST MONSTER MOM FRAUD P





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: kathLOON DickSON Pawctucket CT 23 garden street LIAR TERRORIST MONSTER MOM FRAUD P
lisasawitch

2005-08-19, 9:02 am

You were accused tried and convicted did not appeal and never have had
anyone but you declare yourself innocent or the charges false.

Shut up already. And answer the questions below.


You're a DELIBERATE LIAR!


KATHLEEN IT AIN'T FUNNY STOP THE LIES YOU LYING LIAR!


Featured in Court & Police


Kathleen Dickson
Published on 5/8/2004


Kathleen Dickson, 46, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Thursday
with being a fugitive from justice.


=A9 The Day Publishing Co., 2004


Featured in Court & Police


Kathleen Dickson


Published on 5/9/2004


Kathleen Dickson, 45, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Friday
with second-degree harassment and threatening.


=A9 The Day Publishing Co., 2004


ANSWER THE QUESTIONS KATHLEEN


Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change
the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you
answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about
McSweegan or former Governor Rowland and all your typical diversionary
crap anyway.


PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're
selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple
newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who
need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you
are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid
schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your
own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be
about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in
life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people
from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely
people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little
kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and

CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and
homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.


How do you like them apples?


Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer
the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If
there's a question yOU don't understand which is hard to believe given
your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.


Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore
this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your
silence will be construed as admissions to all OF the facts listed as
questions.


PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You
have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to
these questions. Straight answers.


REPOST:


http://groups-beta.google.com/group.../browse_thre...



Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS


And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is
actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what
you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.


Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has
been--YOU.


Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is
just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what
Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.


Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject.

I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions
for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now
dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the
questions for your answers:


Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?


You CLAIM there is a court Order prohibiting you from criticizing the
government. Post it!


And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts
kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all
here.


Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing
Jessica Gauvin?


Did you flee to Canada?


Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF
when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your
kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal
that?


Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?


Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs
whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?


Come on specifically what isn't true?


You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,
admit or deny?


Now you say you've proven you're innocent.


In what court were your convictions overturned?


In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly
were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?


Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?


You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in
CT?


Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?


Admit or deny you feld to canada?


Admit or deny you were convicted?


Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?


Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you
never filed an appeal did you?


So who's lying about what?


Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what
the court thought was it?


Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer
at the time when you had "retired" years before?


Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally
registered charity?


Kathleen you're the liar here.


Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is
crazy, not you?


And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of
your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting
on the internet than any real accomplishments?
http://groups-beta.google.com/group...wse_thread/thr=
ead/961a6d2015746801/41df41b82df2d0a1?hl=3Den#41df41b82df2d0a1


Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above.


Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back
and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU
are!


And see kathleen's post advocating cyberterrorism:


http://groups-beta.google.com/group...wse_thread/thr=
ead/f4f83960053d8933/cbae392e9ba84df7?q=3DEWALD&rnum=3D3&hl=3Den#cbae392e9b=
a84df7


This is a federal crime. A SERIOUS Federal Crime. So do what you think
is right! By the way this is almost certainly a violation of her
probation/parole.

Kathleen Dickson

860-599-5451
23 Garden St., Pawcatuck 06379

Remember, she's provided everyone with contact information for the FBI
in New Haven: FBI New Haven 203-777-6311


Here's a way to contact the FBI via the internet:

FBI Tips and Public Leads


https://tips.fbi.gov/


While the FBI continues to encourage the public to submit information
regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, this form may also
be used to report any suspected criminal activity to the FBI.


FBI Tips and Public Leads


Your First Name


Your Middle Name


Your Last Name


Your Phone


Your Email


Your Street 1


Your Street 2


Your Suite/Apt/Mail Stop


Your City


Your State


Your Country
Your Zip Code / Route


Please describe your information:


http://groups-beta.google.com/group...wse_thread/thr=
ead/507b61f6eeaa6a31/540c8012ea93f24d?q=3Dcyber&rnum=3D1&hl=3Den#540c8012ea=
93f24d

kathleen May 3, 1:45 pm hide options


Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
From: "kathleen" <kathleen.dick...@snet.net> - Find messages by this
author
Date: 3 May 2005 10:45:05 -0700
Local: Tues, May 3 2005 1:45 pm
Subject: FBI Cyber Crime information
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse

http://www.fbi.gov/cyberinvest/cyberhome.htm


http://www.ic3.gov/


National White Collar crime center:
http://www.nw3c.org/----------------------------


The FBI plays two very important roles in cyberspace. First, it is the
lead law enforcement agency for investigating cyber attacks by foreign
adversaries and terrorists. The potential damage to the United
States'national security from a cyber-based attack includes
devastating interruptions of critical communications, transportation,
and other services. Additionally, such attacks could be used to access
and steal protected information and plans. The FBI also works to
prevent criminals, sexual predators, and others intent on malicious
destruction from using the Internet and on-line services to steal from,
defraud, and otherwise victimize citizens, businesses, and communities.



The mission of the Cyber Division is to:


coordinate, supervise and facilitate the FBI's investigation of those
federal violations in which the Internet, computer systems, or networks
are exploited as the principal instruments or targets of terrorist
organizations, foreign government sponsored intelligence operations, or
criminal activity and for which the use of such systems is essential to
that activity;


form and maintain public/private alliances in conjunction with enhanced
education and training to maximize counterterrorism,
counter-intelligence, and law enforcement cyber response capabilities;
and


until such time as a final decision is made regarding the future role
and location of the National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC),
the FBI will direct and coordinate the Center's mission to protect the
Nation's critical information infrastructure and other key assets.




Federal Bureau of Investigation - Contact Us

http://www.fbi.gov/contactus.htm

The FBI can be contacted twenty-four hours a day, every day. Here's
how:

FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Call (202) 324-3000 or write to the following address:

Federal Bureau of Investigation
J=2E Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Local FBI Offices
See Your Local FBI Office for the addresses and phone numbers of our
field offices nationwide-as well as links to their web sites.

FBI Offices Worldwide
If you are outside the United States and need to reach the FBI, call
the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate office.

Reporting Crime
To report a violation of U.S. federal law or provide a possible tip in
a criminal or counterterrorism investigation, use our electronic FBI
Tips and Public Leads form. Or contact your local FBI field office or
closest international office.

To report suspected espionage activity, see our Awareness of National
Security Issues and Response (ANSIR) page.

Been victimized by an online scam? File a complaint with the Internet
Crime Complaint Center run by the FBI and the National White Collar
Crime Center.



kathleen wrote:
> Russia and China rattle sabres with joint war games
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/china/sto...1552199,00.html
> Show of force an effort to erode US image as world police
>
> Tom Parfitt in Moscow
> Friday August 19, 2005
> The Guardian
>
> Russia and China launched their first joint military exercise yesterday
> in a show of force calculated to dissuade the US from presuming a
> dominant role in global security.
>
> Fighter planes, bombers and more than 10,000 troops will take part in
> the week-long war games in Vladivostok and the Yellow Sea.
>
> While analysts say the exercises are mainly an excuse for Russia to
> showcase aircraft to its biggest military hardware client, the two
> countries are keen to erode Washington's image as a world policeman.
>
> Article continues
> Moscow and Beijing's interests converge in central Asia, where both
> hope to quell Islamic extremism, preserve trade interests and stifle US
> attempts to dominate the region.
>
> "It's an attempt to remind the US that a different truth exists which
> can also be enforced by military might," said Ivan Safranchuk of the
> Centre for Defence Information.
>
> The Russians and Chinese have shown signs of forming a loose alliance
> against America in recent months, but defence officials were at pains
> to emphasise that the exercise, Peace Mission 2005, was not aimed at
> any country. "The exercise will be carried out in the framework of the
> fight against international terrorism and extremism, to respond to new
> threats and challenges," said Liang Guanglie, chief-of-staff of China's
> armed forces.
>
> The manoeuvres would boost the countries' common interests and "protect
> peace and stability in our region and the whole world", he added.
>
> Yury Baluyevsky, Russia's chief of general staff, said the mission was
> "an important event in relations between the two armies and countries".
>
> The war game scenario will see forces from the two countries invade an
> imaginary state stricken by ethnic conflict in order to wrest control
> under a UN mandate.
>
> Russian paratroopers will join Chinese troops to land amphibious craft
> on the Jiaodong peninsula in the Yellow Sea, supported by long-distance
> bombing runs and cruise missiles. It is thought that China's nuclear
> submarine fleet and anti-submarine capability will also be tested.
>
> Ruslan Pukhov, a Russian military analyst, said the strategic bombers
> seemed out of place in a mock anti-terrorist operation, suggesting they
> were only included as potential purchases for Beijing. "It looks more
> like a demonstration of aircraft to a potential client than a
> recreation of peacekeeping operations," he said.
>
> The state arms exporter Rosoboronexport announced yesterday that
> Russia's arms exports this year would match the =A32.8bn sales made in
> 2004.
>
> Washington recently expressed concern at China's military build-up and
> the new commander of the US Pacific fleet, Admiral Gary Roughead, said
> yesterday he was "very interested" in the exercises.
>
> Mr Safranchuk said Moscow and Beijing were seeking to be guarantors of
> security in the region to protect trade interests and sources of cheap
> labour. They were also striving to ensure a "share and a voice" in
> lucrative pipeline deals, he said.
>
> The US state department spokesman Sean McCormack said Washington would
> not have observers at the exercises but hoped they would not be
> "something that would be disruptive to the current atmosphere in the
> region."
>
>
>
> Special reports
> China
>
> Archived articles
> More on China
>
> World news guide
> China
>
> Useful links
> Chinese government gateway site
> Human rights in China
> China Daily
> South China Morning Post
> China Times


Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com