| lisasawitch 2005-08-19, 9:02 am |
| You know, kathLOOOOOOOON, you really do have balls!
YOU who post as chuck and iksnizsak (Kaczynski the unabomber spelled
wrong and backwards), have the GALL to say that anyone else is
"disconnected from reality."
YOU who filed a "complaint" which amounts to your incoherent ramblings
and ravings filed with the clerk for a fee of a couple of hundred
dollars, YOU who have filed ANOTHER "complaint" as a "class action"
which amounts to the same incoherent nonsense neither of which complies
with basic pleading rules under the Fed.R.Civ.P. and rule 23 (on class
actions) YOU who filed against the State of CT in Rhode Island where
venue does NOT lie, YOU who filed on behalf of your children who you do
NOT have the legal authority to file on behalf of because your parental
rights were TERMINATED by the court as a result of your abuse and
neglect, YOU who were locked up in jail and a mental ward YOU who fled
to canada to evade criminal charges and upon arriving there notified
the RCMP about the "Lyme rico case" ...
Well it goes on and on (see below).
But you sure do have some unmitigated gall you freaking hypocrite!
You were accused tried and convicted did not appeal and never have had
anyone but you declare yourself innocent or the charges false.
Shut up already. And answer the questions below.
You're a DELIBERATE LIAR!
KATHLEEN IT AIN'T FUNNY STOP THE LIES YOU LYING LIAR!
Featured in Court & Police
Kathleen Dickson
Published on 5/8/2004
Kathleen Dickson, 46, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Thursday
with being a fugitive from justice.
=A9 The Day Publishing Co., 2004
Featured in Court & Police
Kathleen Dickson
Published on 5/9/2004
Kathleen Dickson, 45, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Friday
with second-degree harassment and threatening.
=A9 The Day Publishing Co., 2004
ANSWER THE QUESTIONS KATHLEEN
Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change
the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you
answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about
McSweegan or former Governor Rowland and all your typical diversionary
crap anyway.
PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're
selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple
newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who
need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you
are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid
schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your
own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be
about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in
life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people
from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely
people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little
kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and
CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and
homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.
How do you like them apples?
Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer
the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If
there's a question yOU don't understand which is hard to believe given
your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.
Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore
this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your
silence will be construed as admissions to all OF the facts listed as
questions.
PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You
have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to
these questions. Straight answers.
REPOST:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group.../browse_thre...
Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is
actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what
you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.
Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has
been--YOU.
Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is
just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what
Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.
Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject.
I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions
for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now
dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the
questions for your answers:
Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?
You CLAIM there is a court Order prohibiting you from criticizing the
government. Post it!
And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts
kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all
here.
Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing
Jessica Gauvin?
Did you flee to Canada?
Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF
when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your
kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal
that?
Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?
Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs
whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?
Come on specifically what isn't true?
You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,
admit or deny?
Now you say you've proven you're innocent.
In what court were your convictions overturned?
In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly
were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?
Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?
You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in
CT?
Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?
Admit or deny you feld to canada?
Admit or deny you were convicted?
Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?
Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you
never filed an appeal did you?
So who's lying about what?
Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what
the court thought was it?
Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer
at the time when you had "retired" years before?
Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally
registered charity?
Kathleen you're the liar here.
Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is
crazy, not you?
And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of
your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting
on the internet than any real accomplishments?
http://groups-beta.google.com/group...wse_thread/thr=
ead/961a6d2015746801/41df41b82df2d0a1?hl=3Den#41df41b82df2d0a1
Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above.
Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back
and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU
are!
And see kathleen's post advocating cyberterrorism:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group...wse_thread/thr=
ead/f4f83960053d8933/cbae392e9ba84df7?q=3DEWALD&rnum=3D3&hl=3Den#cbae392e9b=
a84df7
This is a federal crime. A SERIOUS Federal Crime. So do what you think
is right! By the way this is almost certainly a violation of her
probation/parole.
Kathleen Dickson
860-599-5451
23 Garden St., Pawcatuck 06379
Remember, she's provided everyone with contact information for the FBI
in New Haven: FBI New Haven 203-777-6311
Here's a way to contact the FBI via the internet:
FBI Tips and Public Leads
https://tips.fbi.gov/
While the FBI continues to encourage the public to submit information
regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, this form may also
be used to report any suspected criminal activity to the FBI.
FBI Tips and Public Leads
Your First Name
Your Middle Name
Your Last Name
Your Phone
Your Email
Your Street 1
Your Street 2
Your Suite/Apt/Mail Stop
Your City
Your State
Your Country
Your Zip Code / Route
Please describe your information:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group...wse_thread/thr=
ead/507b61f6eeaa6a31/540c8012ea93f24d?q=3Dcyber&rnum=3D1&hl=3Den#540c8012ea=
93f24d
kathleen May 3, 1:45 pm hide options
Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
From: "kathleen" <kathleen.dick...@snet.net> - Find messages by this
author
Date: 3 May 2005 10:45:05 -0700
Local: Tues, May 3 2005 1:45 pm
Subject: FBI Cyber Crime information
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse
http://www.fbi.gov/cyberinvest/cyberhome.htm
http://www.ic3.gov/
National White Collar crime center:
http://www.nw3c.org/----------------------------
The FBI plays two very important roles in cyberspace. First, it is the
lead law enforcement agency for investigating cyber attacks by foreign
adversaries and terrorists. The potential damage to the United
States'national security from a cyber-based attack includes
devastating interruptions of critical communications, transportation,
and other services. Additionally, such attacks could be used to access
and steal protected information and plans. The FBI also works to
prevent criminals, sexual predators, and others intent on malicious
destruction from using the Internet and on-line services to steal from,
defraud, and otherwise victimize citizens, businesses, and communities.
The mission of the Cyber Division is to:
coordinate, supervise and facilitate the FBI's investigation of those
federal violations in which the Internet, computer systems, or networks
are exploited as the principal instruments or targets of terrorist
organizations, foreign government sponsored intelligence operations, or
criminal activity and for which the use of such systems is essential to
that activity;
form and maintain public/private alliances in conjunction with enhanced
education and training to maximize counterterrorism,
counter-intelligence, and law enforcement cyber response capabilities;
and
until such time as a final decision is made regarding the future role
and location of the National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC),
the FBI will direct and coordinate the Center's mission to protect the
Nation's critical information infrastructure and other key assets.
Federal Bureau of Investigation - Contact Us
http://www.fbi.gov/contactus.htm
The FBI can be contacted twenty-four hours a day, every day. Here's
how:
FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Call (202) 324-3000 or write to the following address:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J=2E Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
Local FBI Offices
See Your Local FBI Office for the addresses and phone numbers of our
field offices nationwide-as well as links to their web sites.
FBI Offices Worldwide
If you are outside the United States and need to reach the FBI, call
the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate office.
Reporting Crime
To report a violation of U.S. federal law or provide a possible tip in
a criminal or counterterrorism investigation, use our electronic FBI
Tips and Public Leads form. Or contact your local FBI field office or
closest international office.
To report suspected espionage activity, see our Awareness of National
Security Issues and Response (ANSIR) page.
Been victimized by an online scam? File a complaint with the Internet
Crime Complaint Center run by the FBI and the National White Collar
Crime Center.
iksnizsakdet@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hagel: Iraq growing more like Vietnam
> Republican Senator says Bush should meet with protesting mom
>
> WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska on Thursday
> said the United States is "getting more and more bogged down" in Iraq
> and stood by his comments that the White House is disconnected from
> reality and losing the war.
>
> The longer U.S. forces remain in Iraq, he said, the more it begins to
> resemble the Vietnam war.
>
> Hagel mocked Vice President Dick Cheney's assertion in June that the
> insurgency in Iraq was in its "last throes," saying the U.S. death toll
> has risen amid insurgent attacks.
>
> "Maybe the vice president can explain the increase in casualties we're
> taking," the Nebraskan told CNN.
>
> "If that's winning, then he's got a different definition of winning
> than I do."
>
> On Thursday, Cheney told a veterans group that "Iraq is a critical
> front in the war on terror, and victory there is critical to the future
> security of the U.S."
>
> "Every man and woman who fights and sacrifices in this war is serving a
> just and noble cause," Cheney told the 73rd National Convention of the
> Military Order of the Purple Heart in Springfield, Missouri.
>
> Hagel, an Army infantry squad leader during the Vietnam war, sits on
> the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and supported the October 2002
> resolution authorizing military action against Iraq.
>
> But he said the United States risks losing more public support for the
> conflict amid a rising cost in blood and money.
>
> "The casualties we're taking, the billion dollars a week we're putting
> in there, the kind of commitment we've got -- we're not going to be
> able to sustain it," he said.
>
> Iraq and Vietnam still have more differences than similarities, he
> said, but "there is a parallel emerging."
>
> "The longer we stay in Iraq, the more similarities will start to
> develop, meaning essentially that we are getting more and more bogged
> down, taking more and more casualties, more and more heated dissension
> and debate in the United States," Hagel said.
>
> Hagel also did not back away from comments he made in June to U.S. News
> & World Report that "the White House is completely disconnected from
> reality" and "the reality is that we're losing in Iraq."
>
> "It gives me no great pleasure to have said that and to say that now,"
> he said Thursday.
>
> He said the U.S. death toll has continued to rise "at a very
> significant rate -- more dead, more wounded, less electricity in Iraq,
> less oil being pumped in Iraq, more insurgent attacks, more insurgents
> coming across the border, more corruption in the government."
>
> A total of 1,861 American troops have died in the war since the
> U.S.-led invasion in March 2003, including four who were killed
> Thursday by a roadside bomb in Samarra. (Full story)
>
> Cheney said in June that the insurgency is "in the last throes," and he
> predicted that the fighting will end before the Bush administration
> leaves office. (Full story)
>
> In the CNN interview Thursday, Hagel mentioned Cheney's comments about
> the insurgency and quickly added, "The facts speak for themselves."
>
> Hagel did say he agrees with President Bush that the United States
> should not set a timetable for troop withdrawal, but he also predicted
> the United States would begin "withdrawing troops from Iraq next year."
>
> "I don't like time frames because it gives the president no
> flexibility, and I think you always must have flexibility in these
> things and a judgment call by the president," he said.
>
> Ultimately, he said, it's up to the Iraqis to control their nation's
> fate.
>
> "That means they are either going to have to be in a position sometime
> next year to really step up in governing themselves, defending
> themselves, supporting themselves, or we can't continue to stay there
> indefinitely," Hagel said.
>
> The next six months will be "very critical" in Iraq, he said.
>
> "Not just the constitution writing, referendum, the election -- but
> also within that six months' period we're going to see whether the
> Iraqis are really going to be capable of defending themselves," he
> said.
>
> On another Iraq-related issue, Hagel said Bush made the wrong decision
> by not meeting again with Cindy Sheehan, a mother of a U.S. soldier
> killed in Iraq who has camped outside the president's Texas ranch.
> (Full story)
>
> Sheehan "deserves some consideration, and I think that should have been
> done right from the beginning," Hagel said, noting that Bush did meet
> with her shortly after her son's death last year.
>
> "I think the wise course of action, the compassionate course of action,
> the better course of action would have been to immediately invite her
> in to the ranch. It should have been done when this whole thing
> started. Listen to her."
>
>
>
> Find this article at:
> http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/08...iraq/index.html
>
> Click Here to Print
> SAVE THIS | EMAIL THIS | Close
> Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article.
|