| Ilena Rose 2005-07-29, 11:52 am |
| Mark Probert wrote:
> Contrary to what KARLa ROVEnthal claimed, this is not from the esteemed
> Dr. Stephen Barrett, but from court documents filed in this case.
LOL ... 'esteemed'???????? Funny joke!
Even tho the Supreme Court of NY took away his ability to 'practice'
law ... and ruled that he must not give public opinions on the law ...
Probert continues to 'publicize' for the dubious and oft discredited
Quackwatch/Healthfraud Team headed by non licensed Barrett.
Indeed ... this is the healthfraud's attorney's opionion on the case
.... not a Judge's ruling.
Three Appeals Court Judges in California DID rule on Barrett recently
.... and their assessment of that case he lost was that he is:
"biased and unworthy of credibility."
To read what the Supreme Court of NY says about Probert, read here:
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/SandraProbert.htm
Further, another healthfraud attorney, Chris Grell ... also lost his
libel suit against me ... not only had I not 'libelled' him ... I had
never even heard of him before he SLAPP sued me.
So far, he owes thousands for my attorneys ...
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/quackbustersvsilena.htm
|