| Author |
From the pond of life: Why do Doctors kill?
|
|
| Reel Mckoi 2005-07-26, 9:06 am |
| Answer:
One doctor said: “If there are a few doctors who seem to do more, it’s
because some of us are still struggling with our Hippocratic (oath).”
Concerning abortion the oath states: “I will give no deadly medicine to
any one if asked nor suggest any such counsel, and in like manner I will
not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion.”
| |
| Therion Ware 2005-07-26, 9:06 am |
|
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:40:14 -0400 in alt.atheism, Reel Mckoi (Reel
Mckoi <c@c.net> ) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
>Answer:
>
> One doctor said: “If there are a few doctors who seem to do more, it’s
>because some of us are still struggling with our Hippocratic (oath).”
>Concerning abortion the oath states: “I will give no deadly medicine to
>any one if asked nor suggest any such counsel, and in like manner I will
>not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion.”
Classical Version:
Swearing by Apollo Physician and Asclepius and Hygieia and Panaceia
and all the gods and goddesses!!! I hope our Christian friends will be
maounting a campaign to ban this evil oath ASAP....!!!
<text>
I swear by Apollo Physician and Asclepius and Hygieia and Panaceia and
all the gods and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will
fulfil according to my ability and judgment this oath and this
covenant:
To hold him who has taught me this art as equal to my parents and to
live my life in partnership with him, and if he is in need of money to
give him a share of mine, and to regard his offspring as equal to my
brothers in male lineage and to teach them this art - if they desire
to learn it - without fee and covenant; to give a share of precepts
and oral instruction and all the other learning to my sons and to the
sons of him who has instructed me and to pupils who have signed the
covenant and have taken an oath according to the medical law, but no
one else.
I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according
to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice.
I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor
will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to
a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my
life and my art.
I will not use the knife, not even on sufferers from stone, but will
withdraw in favor of such men as are engaged in this work.
Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the sick,
remaining free of all intentional injustice, of all mischief and in
particular of sexual relations with both female and male persons, be
they free or slaves.
What I may see or hear in the course of the treatment or even outside
of the treatment in regard to the life of men, which on no account one
must spread abroad, I will keep to myself, holding such things
shameful to be spoken about.
If I fulfil this oath and do not violate it, may it be granted to me
to enjoy life and art, being honored with fame among all men for all
time to come; if I transgress it and swear falsely, may the opposite
of all this be my lot.
| |
| MarkA 2005-07-26, 12:10 pm |
| On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:40:14 -0400, Reel Mckoi wrote:
> Answer:
>
> One doctor said: ´If there are a few doctors who seem to do more,
> itÿs
> because some of us are still struggling with our Hippocratic (oath).¡
> Concerning abortion the oath states: ´I will give no deadly medicine to
> any one if asked nor suggest any such counsel, and in like manner I will
> not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion.¡
That is why many medical schools administer the "Oath of Maimonides"
instead, as many people object to the prohibitions against abortion and
euthanasia.
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
| |
| kathryn 2005-07-26, 12:10 pm |
|
"Reel Mckoi" <c@c.net> wrote in message
news:QipFe.184$tz5.5395530@news.sisna.com...
> Answer:
>
> One doctor said: “If there are a few doctors who seem to do more, it’s
> because some of us are still struggling with our Hippocratic (oath).”
> Concerning abortion the oath states: “I will give no deadly medicine to
> any one if asked nor suggest any such counsel, and in like manner I will
> not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion.”
Lets hope he never has female patience who need an abortion or they will die
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-26, 6:02 pm |
|
"kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in message
news:dc5qoa$rm9$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
>
> "Reel Mckoi" <c@c.net> wrote in message
> news:QipFe.184$tz5.5395530@news.sisna.com...
>
> Lets hope he never has female patience who need an abortion or they will
> die
=============================
That's what the anti-choice group wants! Even some Dr's are anti-choice.
They don't care if she dies. They'll mumble it was god's will. This way
the woman gets PUNISHED for her horrendous and unbelievable sin of having
sex. They can then thump their bibles over her grave and talk about how
pious they were in making abortion illegal or very difficult to get again.
Please snick rec.ponds because it has nothing to do with abortion or the
law.
--
CR........
"Where two or three are gathered together in MY name, I am in their midst:"
[Matt 18:20] No Watchtower Society needed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<~~<{@
| |
| Johnny 2005-07-26, 6:02 pm |
|
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e66d2f$0$16535$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> "kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in message
> news:dc5qoa$rm9$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
> =============================
> That's what the anti-choice group wants!
Bullshit.
Why don't you do some research and find out what Pro-Lifers really want?
Why don't you support children who are in the womb, and why aren't you for
letting people know which slut got what job/promotion via sexual favors for
the rich?
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-26, 6:02 pm |
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:qxuFe.2568$Ie1.341@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
> news:42e66d2f$0$16535$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> Bullshit.
## Oh? So you do want the woman to have a CHOICE?
> Why don't you do some research and find out what Pro-Lifers really want?
## I already did. They want abortion made illegal again. Maybe you need to
do some research.
> Why don't you support children who are in the womb,
## Why don't you support women who are already born?
and why aren't you for
> letting people know which slut
## What's your definition of a slut? A married women with too many children
already? A silly teen girl who let some boy talk her into sex? A rape
victim? A woman who used birth-control and it failed? When I hear the word
"slut" I know I'm dealing with a religious anti-sex nutcase or a
misogynist - which are you Johnny?
got what job/promotion via sexual favors for
> the rich?
## You must suffer from some serious mental disorder.
--
CR.....
http://silentlambs.org
www.freeminds.org
~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~*
| |
| Johnny 2005-07-26, 6:02 pm |
|
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e69768$0$16536$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:qxuFe.2568$Ie1.341@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> ## Oh? So you do want the woman to have a CHOICE?
>
>
> ## I already did. They want abortion made illegal again. Maybe you need
> to do some research.
>
>
> ## Why don't you support women who are already born?
How many of them were not in the womb?
>
> ## What's your definition of a slut? A married women with too many
> children already? A silly teen girl who let some boy talk her into sex?
> A rape victim? A woman who used birth-control and it failed? When I hear
> the word "slut" I know I'm dealing with a religious anti-sex nutcase or a
> misogynist - which are you Johnny?
>
>
> ## You must suffer from some serious mental disorder.
Is that the best you can come up with to defend the ambitious sex favors for
$$ and position crowd?
| |
| Attila 2005-07-26, 11:09 pm |
| On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:38:41 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<qxuFe.2568$Ie1.341@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
>news:42e66d2f$0$16535$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
>Bullshit.
>Why don't you do some research and find out what Pro-Lifers really want?
>Why don't you support children who are in the womb, and why aren't you for
>letting people know which slut got what job/promotion via sexual favors for
>the rich?
>
Assuming facts not in evidence.
| |
| Attila 2005-07-26, 11:09 pm |
| On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:26:10 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<HSxFe.4208$Ie1.2301@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>Is that the best you can come up with to defend the ambitious sex favors for
>$$ and position crowd?
>
Why do you think that is the only reason a woman would get an
abortion?
| |
| Johnny 2005-07-26, 11:09 pm |
|
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:0vgde1p53c8r1kgo3qjkp5uvb2mtlitbad@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:38:41 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
> in alt.abortion with message-id
> <qxuFe.2568$Ie1.341@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Assuming facts not in evidence.
Bullshit. There is ample evidence.
The fact that it is not in the court record does nothing to erase it
existence.
| |
| Attila 2005-07-27, 9:01 am |
| On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:04:22 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<2bAFe.2284$G71.2146@bignews3.bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
>news:0vgde1p53c8r1kgo3qjkp5uvb2mtlitbad@4ax.com...
>
>Bullshit. There is ample evidence.
>The fact that it is not in the court record does nothing to erase it
>existence.
>
Nonsense. Your statement implies most if not all abortions are
obtained on the basis of "which slut got what job/promotion via sexual
favors for the rich?" You have not proven this.
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 9:01 am |
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:2bAFe.2284$G71.2146@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
> news:0vgde1p53c8r1kgo3qjkp5uvb2mtlitbad@4ax.com...
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Bullshit. There is ample evidence.
$$ Where is there evidence that the majority of abortions are caused by some
"slut" sleeping with her boss? How many teenagers or married woman are
sleeping with their boss? You make no sense.......
> The fact that it is not in the court record does nothing to erase it
> existence.
$$ The existence of what? If it's true where you live then you need to move
to a better neighborhood.
--
CR.......
All the JWs wish for is walking around the COUNTRYSIDE (never any towns
pictured in the WT rags) smiling like the village idiot and carrying
baskets of veggies and fruit with them. Also note they all live in suit
pants and dress shirts. The women live in housedresses of 1952 vintage.....
and they call that paradise? Any normal human being would rapidly be bored
to death looking at trees, grass, each other's ever smiling faces and eating
a vegetarian diet.
They'd soon be longing for a good book, a movie, a Mall or a steak
dinner..... (Carol)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| kathryn 2005-07-27, 9:01 am |
|
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e66d2f$0$16535$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> "kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in message
> news:dc5qoa$rm9$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
> =============================
> That's what the anti-choice group wants! Even some Dr's are anti-choice.
> They don't care if she dies. They'll mumble it was god's will. This way
> the woman gets PUNISHED for her horrendous and unbelievable sin of having
> sex. They can then thump their bibles over her grave and talk about how
> pious they were in making abortion illegal or very difficult to get again.
>
> Please snick rec.ponds because it has nothing to do with abortion or the
> law.
> --
> CR........
Wow didn't I lose the power of comprehensible english!
But your right, a good number of women need to have an abortion simply
because the pregnancy threatens their life what are those women supposed to
do.
Not to mention the fact that abortion has existed pretty much as long as
pregnancy has - if there aren't clinics there will be backroom abortionists,
more deaths more infertility.
| |
| kathryn 2005-07-27, 9:01 am |
|
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:90hde1l1d34r46vct89jl8jtu8f2jdl46h@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:26:10 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
> in alt.abortion with message-id
> <HSxFe.4208$Ie1.2301@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Why do you think that is the only reason a woman would get an
> abortion?
He can't get a date and it pisses him off?
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 9:01 am |
| > "Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
> news:90hde1l1d34r46vct89jl8jtu8f2jdl46h@4ax.com...
> =======================
> He's somehow stuck on this one issue. I never knew one woman who slept
> with a man to get a better position at her place of work, and I'm a
> Granny. Not one! I believe Johnny is a misogynist, probably caused by
> his total failure with women.
> --
> CR........
> Wise men stare at the unknown, and boldly asks, WHY?
> Others... fall on their hands and knees, and start mumbling...
> (God did it! God did it!)
> ~ Thus Spake God's Creator ~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~><> ><>
>
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 9:01 am |
| > "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:HSxFe.4208$Ie1.2301@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> $$ You failed to answer the question. So I'll ask it again. Why don't
> you support women who are already born?
>
>
>
>
> $$ You failed to answer the questions again. Why is that? So here they
> are again.
> What's your definition of a slut? A married women with too many
> children already? A silly teen girl who let some boy talk her into sex?
> A rape victim? A woman who used birth-control and it failed? When I hear
> the word "slut" I know I'm dealing with a religious anti-sex nutcase or a
> misogynist - which are you Johnny?
>
> --
> CR.....
> Wise men stare at the unknown, and boldly asks, WHY?
> Others... fall on their hands and knees, and start mumbling...
> (God did it! God did it!)
> ~ Thus Spake God's Creator ~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~><> ><>
>
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 9:01 am |
| > "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message[vbcol=seagreen]
> news:2bAFe.2284$G71.2146@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
=====================
Where is this AMPLE evidence? Site please.
CR.............
--Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. "
- George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Volume 1, 1905.
| |
| reel mckoi 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| Cracklin' wrote:
>
>
>
> $$ Where is there evidence that the majority of abortions are caused by
> some "slut" sleeping with her boss? How many teenagers or married woman
> are sleeping with their boss? You make no sense.......
How many women are aborting because of rape? you make no sense.
Here is a website that does:
http://www.vhemt.org/biobreed.htm
| |
| reel mckoi 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| kathryn wrote:
>
Not it does.
| |
| Johnny 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
|
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e72fe9$0$16571$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
How many of them were not in the womb?
| |
| Johnny 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
|
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e731c4$0$16597$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
> =====================
> Where is this AMPLE evidence? Site please.
Why do you need me to tell you?
I am not obliged to reveal to you these facts since Pro-Choice guards the
information so adamantly.
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7zOFe.4970$Ie1.2378@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
> news:42e731c4$0$16597$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> Why do you need me to tell you?
## Why do you not have the site avalible?
> I am not obliged to reveal to you these facts
## What facts? That only older white women who sleep with their boss get
abortions? Since when is that a *fact?*
since Pro-Choice guards the
> information so adamantly.
## What information? I could find nothing on the net through Yahoo or
Google to back what you said.
--
CR..........
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not
based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe."
~ Carl Sagan ~
~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~*
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
|
"kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in message
news:dc79bi$4rk$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
>
> "Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
> news:90hde1l1d34r46vct89jl8jtu8f2jdl46h@4ax.com...
>
>
> He can't get a date and it pisses him off?
====================================
Maybe he's gay? Most gays don't hate women the way he does though. I think
he's just screwed up sexually as are so many religious fundamentalists out
there. They suffer from the Whore/Madonna complex.
--
CR........
Aid to Bible Understanding, 1971 ed., p. 1061
"While malicious lying is definitely condemned in
the Bible, this does not mean that a person is under
obligation to divulge truthful information to people
who are not entitled to it." *WHO DECIDES?*
~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~
http://www.intrex.net/talley/list7_13.html
So many sheep, so much fleecing.
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:gxOFe.4968$Ie1.3900@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
> news:42e72fe9$0$16571$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> How many of them were not in the womb?
=========================
You failed yet again to answer the question. So I'll ask it again.
Why don't you support women who are already born? Why do you only support
fetuses and embryos? Why do you avoid answering questions with other
questions - most unrelated to the question asked? Why don't you seek
professional help for your Whore/Madonna complex?
--
CR..........
Subject: The (NON) Qualifications Of The Translators Of The NWT
Fred Franz: 2 Credit Hours Bible Greek, 21 Credit Hours Classical Greek,
University of Cincinnati, Dropped out junior year.
Nathan Knorr: None
Milton Henschel: None
Albert Schroeder: None
Karl Klein: None
George Gangas: None
~~~ }<(((({O> ~~~ }<{{{{(o> ~~~ }<(((({0> ~~~ }<{{{{{(ô> ~~~
| |
| reel mckoi 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| Cracklin' wrote:
?[vbcol=seagreen]
Really, tell us about your two failed marriages. being a granny means
what exactly? baking cookies?
| |
| reel mckoi 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| Cracklin' wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
You should know, tell us about your days as a motorcycle gangstress.
does that qualify.
[vbcol=seagreen]
That qualifies.
[vbcol=seagreen]
how about the one who spred open, then later on called it rape, so her
husband don't bash her head in. By the way, did that not happen to you
in your first marriage? Weren't you called the black & blue lady of
hells angels?
[vbcol=seagreen]
When I hear the word slut, it reminds of a pond freak, who got married
twiced failerd in her marraige and blame God for her poor choice in men.
You that "ponder"who lost custody of her son for sleeping around and got
dumped in TN.
| |
| UTBill 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:39:45 -0400, wrote:
>Cracklin' wrote:
>?
>
>Really, tell us about your two failed marriages. being a granny means
>what exactly? baking cookies?
It means she had offspring. Something you'll never get to experience.
< This space for rent >
| |
| UTBill 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:47:15 -0400, wrote:
>Cracklin' wrote:
>
>
>You should know, tell us about your days as a motorcycle gangstress.
>does that qualify.
>
>
>
>That qualifies.
>
>
>how about the one who spred open, then later on called it rape, so her
>husband don't bash her head in. By the way, did that not happen to you
>in your first marriage? Weren't you called the black & blue lady of
>hells angels?
>
>
>When I hear the word slut, it reminds of a pond freak, who got married
>twiced failerd in her marraige and blame God for her poor choice in men.
>You that "ponder"who lost custody of her son for sleeping around and got
>dumped in TN.
You're obsessed. I believe Cracklin will own you from this moment on.
< This space for rent >
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
|
"UTBill" <imnot@home.com> wrote in message
news:o4nfe11fdkv4hp938uthtkqn9oo1qemkg8@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:39:45 -0400, wrote:
>
>
>
> It means she had offspring. Something you'll never get to experience.
=========================
Unfortunately Jabriol did have several children, starting when he was about
16 years old. I guess he didn't wait to get married like I did, and it's
eating his lunch. All of his children ABANDONED him because of the way he
treated them, especially Rivas. She got the brunt of his religious
fanaticism, the poor girl.
You notice also he's starting to obsess on divorces now. He's tired of
calling my grandson a "black bastard human wannabe baboon". But he'll get
back to that since he calls bi-racial people and African American's "black
bastard human wannabes." As a sociopath it gives him great pleasure to post
it since he can't call them that to their faces.
As a Jehovah's Witness Jabriol/Zod (whatever nym he's using today) believes
a woman should stay in an unhappy, unrewarding marriage until she dies (or a
husband kills her). No woman deserves to be happy in his opinion.........
--
CR....
"I contend that we are both atheists, I just believe in one less god
than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all other possible gods,
then you
will know why I dismiss yours." -= Stephen F. Roberts =-
~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:gxOFe.4968$Ie1.3900@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
> news:42e72fe9$0$16571$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> How many of them were not in the womb?
================
Uh, ....You still failed to answer the question. So I'll ask it again. Why
don't
you support women who are already born?
I see you can't answer that question because to *support* them you can't
PUNISH them and call them "sluts." See Johnny, all you had to do was be
honest and I wouldn't have had to answer it for you!
--
CR...........
"I contend that we are both atheists, I just believe in one less god
than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all other possible gods,
then you
will know why I dismiss yours." -= Stephen F. Roberts =-
~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
|
"UTBill" <imnot@home.com> wrote in message
news:k6nfe115v67h92517gs6042gl3oif35s5t@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:47:15 -0400, wrote:
>
>
> You're obsessed. I believe Cracklin will own you from this moment on.
===========================
See Bill - this is why I expose the WTS as much as possible. Use Jabriol as
an example of what this cult's teachings do to the minds of some of it's
members. He fully believes his god will reward him for his lies and slander
someday. That's what the WTS teaches them. :-(
And you'll notice how his stories are becoming more hateful, sicker,
stranger, more outrageous, more sex oriented and more vicious. Next he'll
claim I was one of the pilots who flew into the WTC.
What a limited and miserable life this Mr. Santana leads.
--
CR.........
"I contend that we are both atheists, I just believe in one less god
than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all other possible gods,
then you
will know why I dismiss yours." -= Stephen F. Roberts =-
~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*
| |
| UTBill 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:44:56 -0500, wrote:
>
>"UTBill" <imnot@home.com> wrote in message
>news:o4nfe11fdkv4hp938uthtkqn9oo1qemkg8@4ax.com...
>=========================
>Unfortunately Jabriol did have several children, starting when he was about
>16 years old. I guess he didn't wait to get married like I did, and it's
>eating his lunch. All of his children ABANDONED him because of the way he
>treated them, especially Rivas. She got the brunt of his religious
>fanaticism, the poor girl.
>
>You notice also he's starting to obsess on divorces now. He's tired of
>calling my grandson a "black bastard human wannabe baboon". But he'll get
>back to that since he calls bi-racial people and African American's "black
>bastard human wannabes." As a sociopath it gives him great pleasure to post
>it since he can't call them that to their faces.
>
>As a Jehovah's Witness Jabriol/Zod (whatever nym he's using today) believes
>a woman should stay in an unhappy, unrewarding marriage until she dies (or a
>husband kills her). No woman deserves to be happy in his opinion.........
He sounds like a twit, To scared to respond to me.
< This space for rent >
| |
| UTBill 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:02:18 -0500, wrote:
>
>"UTBill" <imnot@home.com> wrote in message
>news:k6nfe115v67h92517gs6042gl3oif35s5t@4ax.com...
>===========================
>See Bill - this is why I expose the WTS as much as possible. Use Jabriol as
>an example of what this cult's teachings do to the minds of some of it's
>members. He fully believes his god will reward him for his lies and slander
>someday. That's what the WTS teaches them. :-(
>
>And you'll notice how his stories are becoming more hateful, sicker,
>stranger, more outrageous, more sex oriented and more vicious. Next he'll
>claim I was one of the pilots who flew into the WTC.
>
>What a limited and miserable life this Mr. Santana leads.
I bet he's even given Scientology a shot.
< snicker >
< This space for rent >
| |
| Cracklin' Rosie 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| UTBill wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:39:45 -0400, wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> It means she had offspring. Something you'll never get to experience.
>
>
>
> < This space for rent >
I see, and this make her an expert on women who sleeps around?
| |
| Cracklin' Rosie 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| UTBill wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:47:15 -0400, wrote:
>
>
>
>
> You're obsessed. I believe Cracklin will own you from this moment on.
>
>
>
> < This space for rent >
As I understand it, her and Fred are owned and branded by the Jabriol.
| |
| UTBill 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:18:51 -0400, wrote:
>UTBill wrote:
>
>I see, and this make her an expert on women who sleeps around?
We're not talking about your lifestyle. I suggest you become a nun.
< This space for rent >
| |
| UTBill 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:20:15 -0400, wrote:
>UTBill wrote:
>
>As I understand it, her and Fred are owned and branded by the Jabriol.
As you understand it....and then there is the truth.
< This space for rent >
| |
| Attila 2005-07-27, 6:07 pm |
| On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:25:49 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<7zOFe.4970$Ie1.2378@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>Why do you need me to tell you?
>I am not obliged to reveal to you these facts since Pro-Choice guards the
>information so adamantly.
>
That is amusing. If the information is so well guarded how do you
know it? If it supports your position, and you have it, why do you
say it is guarded and thus not available?
Did you think no one would notice this is just another in a long list
of your statements that make no sense?
Idiot.
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 11:01 pm |
|
"UTBill" <imnot@home.com> wrote in message
news:gsqfe1prht64jks3lr770oohaljhg90ufm@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:44:56 -0500, wrote:
>
>
>
> He sounds like a twit, To scared to respond to me.
>
>
>
> < This space for rent >
=============================
He's forging *your name* on his posts now. I saw one on one of these
groups. No, he wont confront another man unless he's another JW Jabriol can
threaten to have disfellowshipped ans shunned. Jab's specializes in
harassing, trolling and stalking WOMEN on Usenet. He knows we're not likely
to show up on his doorstep there in Camden NJ.
--
CR.....
http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/kill...i_troll_faq.htm
Make sure of which Cracklin' you're replying to - the TROLL from
alt.religion.jehovahs-witn is using other people's names to bypass
killfiles. There are now TWO Cracklin's and TWO Reel McKoi's posting here.
There is no limit to how low a religious fanatic will stoop to silence
someone or get an audience for themselves when ignored.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-27, 11:01 pm |
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:HSxFe.4208$Ie1.2301@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
> news:42e69768$0$16536$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> How many of them were not in the womb?
>
>
> Is that the best you can come up with to defend the ambitious sex favors
> for $$ and position crowd?
============
What sex favors for money? What kind of neighborhood do you live in? Can't
you come up with something better than 14 year old girls and old married
women sleeping with their bosses to get promotions? You must suffer from
some serious mental disorder, there's no other answer for the things you
post here.
--
CR....
"Thou seest the mote in thy non-JW brother's eye, but thou seest not the
beam
in thine own JW eye. When thou castest the beam out of thine own JW eye,
then wilt thou see clearly to cast the mote from thy non-JW brother's eye."
~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ ~~ * ~~
| |
| Johnny 2005-07-28, 6:00 pm |
|
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e7dde2$0$16570$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:gxOFe.4968$Ie1.3900@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> ================
> Uh, ....You still failed to answer the question. So I'll ask it again.
> Why don't
> you support women who are already born?
I do.
Why don't you support them before they are born or after they become
pregnant with another female?
> I see you can't answer that question because to *support* them you can't
> PUNISH them and call them "sluts."
LOL! Your idea that I want to punish them and call them sluts if what
Pro-Choice is all about.
> See Johnny, all you had to do was be honest and I wouldn't have had to
> answer it for you!
You should try analysis of what exists instead of making inaccurate
statements so much.
| |
| Johnny 2005-07-28, 6:00 pm |
|
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e820dc$0$16587$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:HSxFe.4208$Ie1.2301@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> ============
> What sex favors for money?
Pro-Choice.
> What kind of neighborhood do you live in?
U.S.A.
> Can't you come up with something better than 14 year old girls and old
> married women sleeping with their bosses to get promotions?
Yes. The question is, can you and Pro-Choicers?
LOL!
> You must suffer from some serious mental disorder, there's no other
> answer for the things you post here.
Ridiculous.
Either you know what I am telling you is correct and you resort to erroneous
statements to defend the guilty, or you just do not know much.
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-28, 6:00 pm |
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:Bd6Ge.7945$8g5.2667@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
> news:42e820dc$0$16587$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> Pro-Choice.
## How is that related to prostitution? They existed long before RvW - read
your bible.
[vbcol=seagreen]
> U.S.A.
## You must be in a slum full of hookers by what you've written here.
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Yes. The question is, can you and Pro-Choicers
> LOL!
## I see you have NO answer. How is pro-choice related to prostitution?
They existed long before RvW - read your bible.
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Ridiculous.
## You don't remember from day to day what you post..... among other crazy
things.
> Either you know what I am telling you is correct and you resort to
> erroneous statements to defend the guilty, or you just do not know much.
## You post things so far from reality it's obvious you know nothing.....
nothing about history, abortion, ... nothing! You're pathetic with your
endless rant that making abortion illegal will stop women from aborting.
--
CR....
"I contend that we are both atheists, I just believe in one less god
than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all other possible gods,
then you
will know why I dismiss yours." -= Stephen F. Roberts =-
~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*
| |
| Johnny 2005-07-28, 6:00 pm |
|
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42e8fb7d$0$16535$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
>
> "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:gb6Ge.7944$8g5.2497@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
>
> ## Because is support the woman FIRST - not the fetus or embryo which is
> what you're doing.
Wrong. When two lives exist simultaneously, there are two lives to consider.
How can I be supporting one life over the other in that case?
Pro-Choice places the already born and formerly in utero people who are for
abortion on demand above the other life which exists in utero.
>
>
> ## You forgot what you already posted here about "sluts?" You called
> women who for whatever reason can't or don't want to continue a pregnancy
> sluts. Do you suffer from memory problems?
Tough to forget that abortion, huh?
>
>
> ## Pot calling kettles black again?
You're black?
| |
| Sneekers 2005-07-28, 6:00 pm |
| On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:04:59 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
>
>"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
>news:Af8Ge.13855$h.8690@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
[...]
>
>$$ It's not up to YOU to consider. It's up to the woman - NOT YOU. You
>can't seem to get that for some reason.
That's why he's STILL a virgin at 44.
| |
| Attila 2005-07-28, 6:00 pm |
| On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:06:50 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<Af8Ge.13855$h.8690@bignews6.bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>Wrong. When two lives exist simultaneously, there are two lives to consider.
No, there is only one.
>How can I be supporting one life over the other in that case?
Then don't get an abortion and avoid the question.
>Pro-Choice places the already born and formerly in utero people
Now that is a convoluted phrase if I ever read one.
>who are for
>abortion on demand
No, the availability of abortion.
>above the other life which exists in utero.
Which does not matter. Are humans an endangered species? Where is
the requirement that every possible individual must exist?
>
No, that is precisely what you say.
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>Tough to forget that abortion, huh?
Not according to most of the women who have had one.
>
>
>You're black?
>
| |
| Cracklin' 2005-07-28, 10:54 pm |
|
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:6t7ie1ht50sfpku8m1clktlmd07dkn6o4m@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:04:59 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
>
>
> [...]
>
>
> That's why he's STILL a virgin at 44.
===============================
I think he has other emotional problems, serious problems - besides those he
makes so obvious here.
--
CR.....
http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/kill...i_troll_faq.htm
Make sure of which Cracklin' you're replying to - the TROLL from
alt.religion.jehovahs-witn is using other people's names to bypass
killfiles. There are now TWO Cracklin's and TWO Reel McKoi's posting here.
There is no limit to how low a religious fanatic will stoop to silence
someone or get an audience for themselves when ignored.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|