Home > Archive > Politics and Medicine > December 2004 > Re: What's Wrong With the New York Times's Science Reporting: Nothing





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: What's Wrong With the New York Times's Science Reporting: Nothing
Mark Probert

2004-12-27, 4:08 am


"George Conklin" <georgeconklin1@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:zOWyd.8941$9j5.4801@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Orac" <orac_usa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:orac_usa-0D093B.18201423122004@optonline.svc.highwinds-media.com...
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
court,[vbcol=seagreen]
> the
> should
>
> Just because I believe in universal health care for the USA (Medicare

for
> All Ages) does NOT mean that I believe in junk science. Personally I do

not
> know why women want to mutilate themselves with so-called cosmetic

surgery,
> but that is none of my business. Breast implants? Why bother? But if
> women do bother, they do not need to be afraid of made-up fears.


By Goerge, we agree.

No one
> seemed to fear HRT, which was a real risk.
>
>



Copyright 2003 - 2009 pahealthsystems.com