| Author |
Anti-Spiritual Mentality
|
|
| William Blake Jr. 2006-08-10, 4:31 pm |
| The anti-spiritual mentality comes from those who want to have in their
lives spiritual energy and feed on it without having to value it and
recognize it and reward it rightfully for the good that it does for
them.
In the same way as anti-beauty mentality come from those who want to
have in their lives beautiful people without valuing them or rewarding
them accordingly.
In the same way as anti-emotional (or anti-love) mentality comes from
those who want to feed on people emotionally without having to care
about what they do to those people.
In the same way as anti-woman (and now in parts of the West also
anti-man) mentality comes from those who want to have in their lives
the people involved without rewarding them for what they do for them.
Any mentality that devalues an aspect of human existence or a section
of humanity is a con. It is an attempt to have a free lunch by feeding
on that which makes the existence (or the part of the population)
without having to reward it.
As such, it is a deception and one that must be seen and treated as
such.
Ilya Shambat
http://ibshambat.blogspot.com
| |
| Ashley Clarke 2006-08-11, 4:34 pm |
| I just simply satisfy everyone all the time.
-------------------------------------------------------
Ashley Clarke
-------------------------------------------------------
"William Blake Jr." <ibshambat@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155240303.402942.292740@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> The anti-spiritual mentality comes from those who want to have in their
> lives spiritual energy and feed on it without having to value it and
> recognize it and reward it rightfully for the good that it does for
> them.
>
> In the same way as anti-beauty mentality come from those who want to
> have in their lives beautiful people without valuing them or rewarding
> them accordingly.
>
> In the same way as anti-emotional (or anti-love) mentality comes from
> those who want to feed on people emotionally without having to care
> about what they do to those people.
>
> In the same way as anti-woman (and now in parts of the West also
> anti-man) mentality comes from those who want to have in their lives
> the people involved without rewarding them for what they do for them.
>
> Any mentality that devalues an aspect of human existence or a section
> of humanity is a con. It is an attempt to have a free lunch by feeding
> on that which makes the existence (or the part of the population)
> without having to reward it.
>
> As such, it is a deception and one that must be seen and treated as
> such.
>
> Ilya Shambat
> http://ibshambat.blogspot.com
>
| |
| ilya_shambat2004@yahoo.com 2006-08-12, 9:24 pm |
|
Ashley Clarke wrote:
> I just simply satisfy everyone all the time.
Does that work? Because I've seen many people who do that being
constantly mistaken for being weak when what they are is kind.
| |
| Alistair@nothere.com 2006-09-01, 8:32 am |
| I prefer non-spiritual as opposed to anti-spiritualism (with the
connotation taht I am against spiritualism.
I am non-spiritual because I do not believe in God(s) or other
imaginary "friends" to serve as a crutch. I do not care if anyone else
believes - that is their right - but I do not share in their
delusions.
Alistair
On 10 Aug 2006 13:05:03 -0700, "William Blake Jr."
<ibshambat@hotmail.com> wrote:
>The anti-spiritual mentality comes from those who want to have in their
>lives spiritual energy and feed on it without having to value it and
>recognize it and reward it rightfully for the good that it does for
>them.
>
>In the same way as anti-beauty mentality come from those who want to
>have in their lives beautiful people without valuing them or rewarding
>them accordingly.
>
>In the same way as anti-emotional (or anti-love) mentality comes from
>those who want to feed on people emotionally without having to care
>about what they do to those people.
>
>In the same way as anti-woman (and now in parts of the West also
>anti-man) mentality comes from those who want to have in their lives
>the people involved without rewarding them for what they do for them.
>
>Any mentality that devalues an aspect of human existence or a section
>of humanity is a con. It is an attempt to have a free lunch by feeding
>on that which makes the existence (or the part of the population)
>without having to reward it.
>
>As such, it is a deception and one that must be seen and treated as
>such.
>
>Ilya Shambat
>http://ibshambat.blogspot.com
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
|
|
|
|