| slider 2006-01-04, 11:01 am |
|
"Jeremy H. Donovan" wrote...
>
>
> Well duh. :-)
### - felt like you just 'had' to reply huh? 
> .
> .
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> Rather, talk about a necessary and helpful activity for this group, and
> for all of mankind. :-)
### - as IF you care, plus not the way you do it jeremy... i.e. crashing
people's heads doesn't help anyone's cause, except perhaps yours to feel
some minor act of revenge against what you were just too dumb not to fall
into in the first place + are still too dumb now to even realise it was all
your own fault anyway ha! (stop taking it out on other people in other
words, it's not 'their' fault 'you' are/were dumb, stop pounding on people)
> .
> .
> .
>
>
>
>
> We'll just let you breathe there.
### - *We* huh? - so is that like the... 'royal' we you got there, or just
you and your (almost totally filled-in by now) clone? (grin
I've had three or four friendly
> conversations in this group in the last two weeks, and part of the
> point of my comment was to help insure that this place remains amenable
> to decent conversation.
### - liar, you should have been a politician jeremy, plus decent only as
far as *you're* concerned, no? - i mean who the hell are 'you', a 2-time
cult-loser, to be setting the standards of decency for other folks in a
public forum??? geeze, gimmie a break... i mean you've personally made sooo
many mistakes you're basically the LAST person anyone would, on past
evidence, want to believe 'knows' anything worth having lol
But admittedly my interest is limited to
> conversation between rational and interesting people like me, Eldon and
> Ether.
### - liar... you *don't* just confine your remarks to those 2 people (if
only you did!) and because anyone can see you take an almost sadistic
delight in tormenting unprepared people (keyword here being: 'unprepared')
for your own pathetic purposes & agenda of dancing on a dead-man's grave
while inviting, nay 'insisting' that everyone else join you there, or you're
gonna shoot them, beat them up, do your best to humiliate them in some slick
+ practiced manner (same kinda dumb shit you find in chatrooms basically
that only ever catches the newbies) that for some childish reason you think
is smart, when it's not, it's totally dumb & banal
Only the newbies and flakes will converse at length with you,
> Slider.
### - yes, and because i WILL actually talk to them, even treat them like
fellow human beings, make a genuine attempt to maybe understand some of the
'shit' they've been through in their lives, perhaps even help iron-out a few
wrinkles... instead of trying to damage/beat them into a bloody pulp in some
primitive + pathetic effort to pre-empt any kind of mystical-type
conversation/exploration lest someone might actually want to 'explore'
having something like that in their lives
so yes, you go-sit there in your little 'high-brow' circle looking down your
scientific nose on other people while elevating yourself in your own
eyes-crap... other people have better things to do...
> .
> .
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> You really shouldn't chortle like a TV villain right after saying
> vengeful and deluded things like that, Slider. Just a little tip.
### - what's that, from one villain to another ya mean? lol count me out
bro', i'm just giving to ya's straight here (eldon certainly IS an
XXX-kisser, you only have to read his yucky XXX-kissing + drooling replies
to you while he's busy calling other people XXX-kissers to know that, e-yuk!
> .
> .
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> I'd be surprised if you ever figure out exactly how wrong that is, and
> even more surprised to discover that anyone who matters ever talks to
> you at all in the real world.
### - lol you just keep tellin' yourself that pal, but well you-know, you've
always known better than everyone else lol
> .
> .
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> You live in darkness yet seldom suspect. For example, you are
> currently defending a former Usenet "Kook of the Month" recipient.
> That's how far you'll stretch it just to take one of your cheap little
> shots.
### - nope, unlike you, i don't 'care' who he is, or isn't, his reputation
means absolutely nothing to me, lol i'd probably even give jack the ripper a
'chance' heh heh...
i.e. take people as you find them my friend, don't be biased or prejudiced
in-advance by your own partiality (e.g. Orwell lived as a tramp for 2 years,
but actually he was in-disguise, you'd have seen only the bum in yourself if
you'd met him during that time)
> .
> .
> .
>
>
>
>
> It is for me. :-)
### - sadly i don't think you even know the meaning of the term 'happy'
except when you're beating-up on someone or dancing on a dead-man's grave or
drooling over the latest bit of scientific junk like any of that
scientism-crap could possibly save the world - duh!
> .
> .
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> That kind of fake "mirth" is probably about as close to real happiness
> as you get, Slider. And it's totally your own fault. You traded your
> LIFE for a handful of fake "magic beans". After being warned
> repeatedly, too.
### - my humour bothers you does it? smile, well that's only because you
don't understand it, didn't understand it before, can't understand it, is
basically just about all you can level at me now when your puny reason tells
you you've run out of bullet-ideas heh heh...
i.e. jeremy can't handle the subject matter (because he's dishonest) so
changes the subject into a slanging-match (childish ploy) the better to
evade the issue (lol i mean most people drop that kind of idiotic behaviour
in high school don't they? geeze, it's like being a kid again
>
> Sorry old ... "bean" :-), I'm just telling it like it is.
### - like it is for YOU ya mean! (which is the bit you just don't get,
yet... and from the way you're going, probably never will
e.g. since a conversation you & i had a while ago now... on many occasions
since you have been rather 'careful' shall we say, to stop making sweeping
blanket-statements on the subject of rationalism being the be-all & end-all
of absolutely everything, you admitted it: that not everything in the
universe is rational/logical, plus other things since like: science would
have a difficult job of trying to explain something like poetry (Art
basically)
yet you singularly refuse to discuss/probe/explore 'anything' to do with
that tiny chink in rationality's armour which some people call mysticism,
instead wilfully pouring scorn & ridicule on anything (& anyone) who
purports to probe/explore/semi-understand the subject, when all you
personally know on the subject is that you don't believe in it or haven't
had that experience
i.e. anything that can't be 'rationally' or 'logically' explained IS the
mystical ya dope... and you just wont/can't acknowledge that in your
conversations, instead much preferring, as do you and the eldon-recruit , to
go around doing your best to 'close' that gap apparently absolutely
'terrified' someone might actually look in there and maybe say something
positive about Castaneda in the process (roaring laughter!
anyway... enough of you & your problem... take it someplace else
|