| De Roberts 2005-04-20, 5:56 pm |
|
"Tom" <dantoXSPAM@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Q7n8e.8356$lP1.4290@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "De Roberts" <deroberts2@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:jWf8e.16267$H_5.14785@trnddc01...
>
> Do you think it's an inaccurate label?
>
>
> So you don't think it's inaccurate, then.
>
> BTW, are you restricting your definition of a child sexual abuse to the
> rape
> of babies?
>
> The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect defines child sexual
> assault
> as: "Contacts or interactions between a child and an adult when the child
> is
> being used for sexual stimulation of the perpetrator or another person
> when
> the perpetrator or another person is in a position of power or control
> over
> the victim."
>
> That's a little broader than baby raping, isn't it? You seem to be
> ignoring
> a whole gamut of sex crimes against children. So you're in favor of
> allowing other forms of sexual abuse of children, so long as they're not
> baby-rape! Then, according to Shez's stated reasoning, you are an
> apologist
> for pedophiles, which means you're a pedophile yourself. No one is going
> to
> forgive you, you know. It's well known that you pedophiles cannot change,
> so there's no hope for *you* anymore. Give all the decent people a break
> and kill yourself before you hurt even more children with your horrible,
> inhuman, uncontrollable perversions.
>
>
Wow you do enjoy twisting things around don't you? I would consider any
sexual contact with a child by an adult to be a form of rape.
Check out this site and then tell me you think they are going to change with
some therapy
http://216.220.97.17/
De
|