|
| In article <d3f4no$tfc$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>, Don <don@yahoo.co.uk>
writes
>
>"Shez" <shez@oldcity.f2s.com> wrote in message
>news:ccT7ajA3ExWCFwQ3@oldcity.f2s.com...
>
>You should be careful about making defamatory statements of this nature.
>
>There is no suggestion that he was an accessory in child sexual abuse. There
>is no suggestion that he committed any criminal act or that he incited or
>conspired with other persons to commit child abuse.
>
>You are allowing your emotions to interfere with your perception of reality.
>
>I presume that it is simply your ignorance of the expression "accessory"
>which has mislead you into making this vile assertion.
>
>regards
>Don
>
>
If you help someone cover up a murder and shelter them and hide them
your an accessory after the fact... is he any different Don, he helped,
sheltered and hid pedophile priests, he didnt turn them into the police,
he payed off families to stop them going to the police or to the media.
He is in my eyes as guilty as the pedophile priests themselves.
>
>
--
Shez shez@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
|
|