| De Roberts 2005-04-19, 10:49 am |
|
"Tom" <dantoXSPAM@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:eUm8e.8341$lP1.3310@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> <joerevskelton@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:Vnf8e.62320$UW6.33984@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>
> I am crushed by the logic of your argument, overwhelnmed by the sheer
> power
> of your rational thought. "No, he wasn't". Wow.
>
>
> Zounds. What a devastatingly subtle debate technique.
>
> Clearly there's no arguing with you, professor. You have all the bases
> covered, alright.
>
>
> How did the position that Christ did not regard child molesting as
> unforgiveable suddenly get transformed into an argument that Christ
> excuses
> child molesting?
>
It didn't or your reading something that the rest of us can't see. How do
you turn his statement into such an argument?
> Yoo hoo! I'm over here! That's a straw man you're whacking.
>
> while
>
> Yoo hoo! I'm over here! That's another straw man! That Jesus got mad at
> merchants defiling his temple has nothing whatever to do with whether it's
> worse than some other sin. So I don't see what there is in my statements
> that leads you to interpret them as meaning that I claimed that the temple
> incident means that child molesting is a lesser or greater sin. Let me
> repeat the crucial point. The temple incident has nothing to do with what
> Jesus thought about child molesters. I never said it did. Yet you seem
> to
> be insuisting that I am making such a statement. That's a straw man,
> professor. It's not me you're arguing with. It's something you made up
> all
> on your own.
>
The temple part was an example of his anger. In other words if Jesus got
that angry over merchants in the temple then imagine him catching someone
forcing his dick in a childs mouth.
> their
>
> Well, in might if you had any. Let's see this "valid data" that suggests
> this to you. And let's also hear your reasons why you declare as invalid
> every citation I've provided in this thread. Let's see how that
> devastating
> intelligence of yours operates.
>
I read your site and reponded in another post and yet you didn't repond to
that. The lowest number given was 14%. If that many out of 10000 go back
out to molest that's 1400 back out harming children. Let's face it this is
not a crime of passion. It is premeditated. They choose their victims
carefully picking on those least likely to tell or be believed.
>
> What!!!?
>
> You're going to let them get away with murder once, and then turn them
> loose
> to destroy some other child before you do something? Now how come you're
> not thinking about that poor victim you gave this horrible monster
> permission to hurt? Are you, as Shez suggests, an apologist for
> pedophiles
> because you don't advocate drastic and immediate action to eliminate these
> child-killers as soon as they are identified, with no second chances for
> them to destroy other innocent lives? Are you apologists, as Shez
> suggests,
> guilty of molesting children yourselves because there is no other
> plausible
> reason why *anyone* would prefer to *permit* known criminals to hurt
> children just because you don't think he's hurt *enough* children *yet*?
> You are no longer human in Shez's eyes, you pervert. She hopes you'll be
> eliminated from the human race before you can strike again, as you no
> doubt
> have, since you argue in favor of child molesting.
>
> But it's too late to change now, you degenerate monster. As you've been
> saying, everybody knows pedophiles can't change, so now that Shez has
> decided that apologists for pedophiles are in fact pedophiles themselves,
> there's absolutely nothing you can do to save yourself. Best nip out and
> shoot yourself, thus sparing some innocent child from the hell you're
> going
> to put her (or him) through.
>
> Remember, Shez tells us that pagans are much nastier than Christians. So
> pagan Inquisitions ought to be much nastier, too. Don't wait for them to
> catch you and get *really* medieval on your XXX.
>
>
How do you get from keeping pedophiles in jail to a pagan inquisition?
De
|