|
| In article <1113092216.512435.139120@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, DW
<DrWoodardOnDS@hotmail.com> writes
>
>Shez wrote:
>getting
>What should really have happened is when a priest was found to have
>abused a kid Bernard Law should have immediately removed them from
>their job and turned them over to the police for prosecution.
>
>What you don't do in a situation like this is shuffle them off to a new
>church, tell them nothing about the allegations and give the priest new
>kids to diddle. But that is exactly what Law did.
>
>
>
>those
>said
>priest
>give
>The cardinals including Law knew it was going on. Their solution was
>to shuffle the priests around.
>
>Did the pope know anything about it? I'm not sure. In his last few
>years you could be standing next to the pope and I don't think he knew
>you
>were there or where he was or who he was.
>
>All in all the whole scandal was botched from top to
>bottom. How far up the top of the food chain we
>may never know. The cardinals certainly knew about
>it but whether the pope really did.
This has been going on for years, and its been known about in the church
and covered up for even more years... the Pope knew, he was not an
innocent one thing they continually say is that he was very loath to let
power into the hands of the cardinals and bishops... He was not that ill
ten years ago, or fifteen years ago.
Bringing the church into disrepute is the constant refrain you here from
the church. They cover things up and then let the abusers go on to abuse
others... if they disapproved they would have taken the priests out of
situations where they were in touch with children, put them in nunnery's
and monastery's where they served the church but couldn't harm children.
They knew, because some of those cardinals and bishops were involved
themselves the church has become a pedophiles paradise.
>
--
Shez shez@oldcity.f2s.com
Shez's Garden at http://www.oldcity.f2s.com/shez/
|
|