|
| "The Good of the Spirit" <spiiriit@goodness.org> wrote in message news:<42383cc9$1@news.comindico.com.au>...
> "HB" <hbkta@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:b901e82f.0503151238.5851b35@posting.google.com...
> : I spent 10 months studying
> : things studied :
> : regular daily yoga practice
> : was 2 or 3 hours :
> : Is that good enough for credential?
>
> WAS? What now.
>
> So far sounds self indulgent.
That could be.
I have heard such comments before.
mostly from people who do not have the discipline of mind to sit for
sadhana for any prolonged period; mostly from those whose minds run to
the external world; mostly from those who consider the only valid
field of activity, of service, to be visible physical action. you
might like to re-read and think about micro-vitta
> But the classes bit sounds like
sounds like you have a really hard time acknowledging that anyone
outside of AM can do anything.
> you did something
"did" ?
still do.
- although what sort of classes, no one knows.
Lots of people know, those who were there, those who attend present
day classes
>
> : I have given classes
> : I have given classes
> : I have given classes
> : and I give classes to .
> :
> : How is that?
>
> Sounds individualistic style of life endeavour without getting others
> involved.
last I checked, only I can do my sadhana, no one else. so in that
sense it is individualistic.
"others" what "others"? Sarbam kevalam Brahma, Sarbam Brahmamayam
Jagat
"involved"? involved in what? involved how?
|
|