|
| "Bee" <in.my.bonnet@Shangri-La.com> wrote in message news:<LTl2d.145$6V6.52@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net>...
> HB wrote:
> yes U, too.
>
>
>
hey Bee, got one in your bonnet or what?
seems to me that you are the one getting all bent out of shape here,
over percieved slights.
> You are reiterating all you said showing no evidence you have read my posts.
>
is that the bee in your bonnet, that I did not respond to you initial
posts on this thread?
> The fact that you rudely brushed aside ideas not agreeing with your own
> without even attempting to understand what the ideas are gives witness to
> your arrogance.
I read your posts. It seemed to me you are confusing the occurance of
an event, that however unlikely it may be is still within the realm of
probability, with coincidence. from websters: 2)the occurance of
events that happen at the same time by accident but seem to have some
connection.
two sixes in a row is unlikey, one could say an accident. but there
does not seem to be any connection, so not a coincidence.(ditto the
arrow impaled mosquito.) perhaps you can explain what the connection
is that two sixes in a row have?
> There is a dearth of argument and a paucity of ideas even
> for your -- new to you -- own conjecture, which is well understood and
> already well known to everybody.
>
aint new to me at all,
obviously not already known to everybody or the OP would not have been
unsure as to the existence, or not, depending on his bent, of
coincidence.
> You bragged and boasted -- if that story was true -- that a lady was "blown
> away".
just the facts maam, no bragging intended.
> I was surprised that she did not follow through and come to your
> classes,
I also wondered about that when told the story.
seems my class did not fit into her life's schedule, even more so
since I do not offer teacher training.
> if you were that good as you implied.
just fair to middlin, always a pleasant surprise for me as well when i
get feed back like that.
> Did she not leave in a huff
> of disgust sensing your arrogance?
you seem to be confused again. that is you sensing arrogance. Did you
hear the one about the world being a mirror of your soul?
> Or, perhaps your performance, blabbing
> nonsensical jargons to impress, was so horrific that she had decided to set
> up a rival school?
no jargon babbling allowed in my classes.
just hand goes here, foot goes there, contract this, relax that.
savasana a the end.
I like to keep it simple.
> Your arrogance has blinded you not to question the
> informer. Pity, for you could have learned and learn from that lady. To
> accept accolade blindly believing your self-supposed self-evident
> superiority is simple-mindedness.
>
Yes, I have been told before that I have a simple mind. the rest of
you rant may or may not apply.
I am always suspicious of any allocade, especcially opening lines like
: "Great stuff, as always, HB! "
> I do not expect you stop from being rude and feeling supremely confident.
> That is the only way simple people defend themselves against adversities.
> But, this is in fact *insecurity*.
>
> Review your own inadequacy, then perhaps you will begin to become an
> adequate teacher.
>
> With regard.
>
> Bee.
(so, what happened to your shangrila.)
|
|