| Dick Adams 2006-06-25, 2:28 am |
|
"Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com> wrote in message =
news:1I6dnaOjTJdudwDZnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@giganews.com...
=20
> "Dick Adams" <bad.addr@nonexist.com> wrote
>=20
with[vbcol=seagreen]
each=20[vbcol=seagreen]
for=20[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
=20[vbcol=seagreen]
> With this technique, without careful coaching, many people choose -050 =
> or -075 more than they really need.
Well, it seems really doubtful that many people have even considered =
doing
such a thing. But I would presume that anyone smart enough to figure =
out
how to get the test lenses, and the right ones, would be smart enough to
avoid overcorrection. =20
Of course, you could argue that most people do not need to read signs
when they drive at night. That might even be your Professional Opinion.
You do not have to see very well in order to get licensed to drive, so =
it
could be considered just an arbitrary preference to want to read signs.
--
Dicky =20
|