|
Home > Archive > Radiology > April 2005 > 3D MRI
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
|
|
|
|
| tontoko 2005-04-05, 6:14 pm |
|
Cindy wrote:
> tontoko wrote:
>
>
> Left is sharp, and right is blurred.
Oh, it's not for the example of sharpening, but stereograph! Please see
the center of two images focusing behind the screen. Then those images
are fused and (perhaps) you will get a stereoscopic image.
| |
|
| tontoko wrote:
> Cindy wrote:
>
>
>
> Oh, it's not for the example of sharpening, but stereograph! Please see
> the center of two images focusing behind the screen. Then those images
> are fused and (perhaps) you will get a stereoscopic image.
>
But, those images are from sagittal section, coronal section, and
transverse section of the body. The surface presented is supposed to be
clean cut flat as a tomogram so to speak. Why do we need stereo image
effect? That can be a distortion. Ultrasound can take care of what you
are trying to accomplish, I think.
| |
| tontoko 2005-04-05, 6:14 pm |
| Yes, in that meaning they are "faked" stereographs. As you've known on
MRI more homogeneous, sharper image the object has. Therefore in those
"faked" stereographs, the homogeneous parts such as bones, tendons, or
hollows were placed in the foreground and less homogeneous parts such
as brain tissues or muscle were placed in the background as the result
of computation
| |
|
| tontoko wrote:
> Yes, in that meaning they are "faked" stereographs. As you've known on
> MRI more homogeneous, sharper image the object has. Therefore in those
> "faked" stereographs, the homogeneous parts such as bones, tendons, or
> hollows were placed in the foreground and less homogeneous parts such
> as brain tissues or muscle were placed in the background as the result
> of computation
>
You know, I got to produce diagnostic images for an accurate diagnosis.
I have no time or reason to play around with these special effects.
| |
| Cindy 2005-04-08, 10:18 pm |
| tontoko wrote:
> Yes, in that meaning they are "faked" stereographs. As you've known on
> MRI more homogeneous, sharper image the object has. Therefore in those
> "faked" stereographs, the homogeneous parts such as bones, tendons, or
> hollows were placed in the foreground and less homogeneous parts such
> as brain tissues or muscle were placed in the background as the result
> of computation
>
You know, I got to produce diagnostic images for an accurate diagnosis.
I have no time or reason to play around with these special effects.
| |
|
|
| tontoko 2005-04-11, 6:07 pm |
|
Cindy wrote:
> tontoko wrote:
>
>
> Left is sharp, and right is blurred.
Oh, it's not for the example of sharpening, but stereograph! Please see
the center of two images focusing behind the screen. Then those images
are fused and (perhaps) you will get a stereoscopic image.
| |
|
| tontoko wrote:
> Cindy wrote:
>
>
>
> Oh, it's not for the example of sharpening, but stereograph! Please see
> the center of two images focusing behind the screen. Then those images
> are fused and (perhaps) you will get a stereoscopic image.
>
But, those images are from sagittal section, coronal section, and
transverse section of the body. The surface presented is supposed to be
clean cut flat as a tomogram so to speak. Why do we need stereo image
effect? That can be a distortion. Ultrasound can take care of what you
are trying to accomplish, I think.
|
| |
|
|