Home > Archive > Prostate > October 2004 > Re: PSA predicts BHP, not much else >>personal experience and comments





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: PSA predicts BHP, not much else >>personal experience and comments
George Conklin

2004-10-04, 2:21 am


<joisey@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:teM5d.3761$Ki1.3169@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> "George Conklin" <nilknoc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:HVn2d.3674$n16.610@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> prostate
> have
> detect
cancer,[vbcol=seagreen]
> Where does all this nonsense come from??????
>
> If the psa is high you do the biopsy.......
>
> Most of the time the biopsy is negative, indicating nothing more than
> enlarged prostate.
> BHP is certainly better news than cancer!!!!!!
>
> I had 2 biopsies 2 years appart and both came back NEGATIVE !!!!!!
>
> What part of negative do you not understand.
>
> The diagnosis was benign.
>
>
> What part of benign do you not understand......
>
> .......joisey
>


The article speaks for itself. I suggest writing to the journal involved
if you disagree. Do you have the expertise to do so?


Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com