Home > Archive > Prostate > October 2004 > Re: PSA predicts BHP, not much else >>personal experience and comments





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: PSA predicts BHP, not much else >>personal experience and comments
George Conklin

2004-10-04, 2:21 am


"Leonard Evens" <len@math.northwestern.edu> wrote in message
news:ZKqdnfaJQYUU5sTcRVn-vQ@comcast.com...
> George Conklin wrote:
>
Just?[vbcol=seagreen]
says,[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> I don't believe the study was concerned directly with what you say
> above. That is based on quotes from other sources.


You mean Stamey did not say that? The article which was released from
his own instiution never talked to him? What are you really saying? The
article is still attached below, word for word.



As I've already[vbcol=seagreen]
> noted, there is a vast difference between the kind of cancer that might
> be discovered on autopsy and prostate cancer which is clinically
> detectable using current methods (or any methods likely to be used in
> the future).
>
current[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> You always like to reduce things to one question. Unfortunately there
> are a variety of important questions to answer. Prostate cancer is a
> complex disease and it doesn't manifest itself the same way in all men.
>


Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com