Home > Archive > Als diseases > November 2006 > LIES





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author LIES
Ordinary

2006-10-17, 4:27 pm

Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 03:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:

Subject: Reversed Evidenced Based Medicine and IDSA's "Lyme Disease"

To: jdrazen@nejm.org, thomas.carson@usdoj.gov, dhaar@courant.com,
horgan@courant.com, NEMag@courant.com, bmiller@newstimes.com,
eliot.spitzer@oag.state.ny.us, trvl@hotmail.com, rastro18@aol.com,
amcguigan@rms-law.com, rjmurzyn@aol.com, Send an Instant Message
paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com, Send an Instant Message
sidney_blumenthal@yahoo.com, Vicky.jaffe@mslpr.com,
criminal.division@usdoj.gov, karla.dobinski@usdoj.gov,
lymeliter@aol.com, christopher.christie@usdoj.gov, francam@ucia.gov,
governor.rell@po.state.ct.us, fitzmas@gmail.com,
patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, modelt1918@sbcglobal.net
CC: Jgerberding@cdc.gov, conndcj@po.state.ct.us,
executive-editor@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com,
news-tips@nytimes.com, dvbid@cdc.gov, brigidcallahan@optonline.net,
james.phillips@yale.edu, mas1@concentric.net, jhornberger@fff.org,
leonard.boyle@po.state.ct.us, FalNields@aol.com,
bransfield@comcast.net, vtsherr@comcast.net, mcneilel@aol.com,
oca@po.state.ct.us, dand@davila-dilzer.com,
scott.murphy@po.state.ct.us, attorney.general@po.state.ct.us,
patrick.clifford@jud.state.ct.us, rstricker@usmamed.com,
thomas.ryan@po.state.ct.us, cpoitras@courant.com, LoftusHome@cs.com

In waiting for an answer to my complaints from the New England Journal,
perhaps the re-exposure to the rest of the world- the world of *normal*
people- of the ridiculousness of HMO "medicine" is timely:


In a world where the US CDC 1) publishes a journal called "Emerging
Infectious Diseases," ( a normal person, even without scientific
training would ask, WHY ARE THEY EMERGING? )

and in a world where 2) a Lyme "vaccine" came and went in 3 short
years,

and in a world where 3) the same scientist said the new borreliosis in
New England was a chronic infection due to the persistence of the
infecting organisms' DNA, despite antibiotic treatment (Nocton and
Steere, NEJM, 1994), was also the same person who said Lyme becomes an
autoimmune disease of the knee only, without any further scientific
evidence (like sero- or cerebrospinal fluid-assay using the same
genus-specific primers used when these lying HMO Hos are pharming for
DNA to patent in a tick),
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...28%28%22rna%22%
5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20RNA%5BText%20Word%5D%29%20AND%20%28%28%22ticks%22%5BTIAB%5D%20NOT%20Medline%5BSB%5D%29%20OR%20%22ticks%22%5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20tick%5BText%20Word%5D%29%29

And in a world where the 5) best DNA assay techniques are available to
US residents, but none of them are applied routinely to persons who
acquire illness from a tick,
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonom...chmode=1&unlock
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonom...wtax.cgi?id=138
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonom...tax.cgi?id=2093


and in a world where the 6) head of one of the CDC's Level IV
bioweapons labs who also said brains were the former media for
Borreliae and that they permanently infect the brain, is also the
person who referred to this bacterium's DNA as a "gold mine from which
to farm virulence determinants," is also the holder of the most patents
for Borrelial DNA (Alan Barbour),
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...LD2=INNM&d=PTXT

and publishes a completely unreferenced book for consumption by
"physicians" that is filled with circular reasoning and the same
argument used by Big Tobacco when referring to the addictiveness of
nicotine (it's controversial), entitled, "Lyme Disease, the Cause, the
Cure, and the Controversy,"

======
KLEMPNER:

7) And in a world where the new head of a CDC Level IV Bioweapons lab
in Boston consistently lies to the press and the journals about his
discoveries:

A) Klempner determines that ceftriaxone does not kill all the
spirochetes:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...l=pubmed_docsum

"Thus, several eukaryotic cell types provide the Lyme disease
spirochete with a
protective environment contributing to its long-term survival."

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...l=pubmed_docsum

"These observations suggest that B. burgdorferi can adhere to,
penetrate,
and invade human fibroblasts in organisms that remain viable."

B) Klempner's Matrix-Metalloproteinases in the spinal fluid of Lyme
patients which
he thinks are contributing to the dementia:

http://www.actionlyme.org/Retro_Klempnerization.htm

(You
have to print out one jpg file at a time by selecting it first and
copying it to a Word document)
ABSTRACT of that scanned in report:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...l=pubmed_docsum


Klempner later published that there are no valid markers of illness in
CNS Lyme
patients and is an author of the IDSA guidelines:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...l=pubmed_docsum

=======

8) and in a world where we have not yet concluded what are the causes
of such devastating diseases as Multiple Sclerosis, ALS or the various
chronic neuropathies and dementias of all kinds,

9) And in a world where all of the combined US National Institutes say
WE HAVE TO TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT ALL THE MARKERS OF DISEASE IN AN
ORGANIZED WAY:

http://intramural.nimh.nih.gov/inip/how2participate.htm


The Infectious Diseases Society thinks they can come up with a
treatment for WE DON'T KNOW DISEASE- the disease for which the test has
never been validated, and which is the reason LYMErix was removed from
the market: Yale and SmithKline had no idea whether or not LYMErix
prevented Lyme, and in fact, they published that it did not, four days
after applying for the patent for LYMErix.


This is a world where the Infectious Diseases Society who claim the
validity of their nonsense claims on the basis of having 8 thousand
members, yet they cannot even tell us what Borreliosis is. It's not
even listed as a disease by any group (except here, by Lenny Sigal,
opposite the page where he says it's caused by self-poisoning and the
deliberate poisoning of our children:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MUNCHAUSENS.htm

To say that the strength of the argument is based on the strength of
the numbers of people who argue it, is as unscientific as it gets.
That's why we Lyme victims have long called the Steere camp the
Flat-Earthers.

If the scientific published evidence is that we're discovering new
diseases in ticks all the time and that we're haven't even begun to
determine all the markers of disease in an organized way - of ALL KNOWN
"SYNDROMES,"

what's the truly amazing discovery is that that Group of 8000 is not
even ashamed of themselves. They don't even think there will be any
consequences for their behavior.

They called Bill Gates up to the stand, didn't they, for RICO?

He seems like a nice guy, but he also said, "We're doing it *my* way,
even if it doesn't work great and the two formats are incompatible."

What's Bill Gates doing now? A little self-imposed restitution?
Stepping over these opportunistic idiots who "work" for the government
and choke over the truth, like Anthony Fauci?
http://www.actionlyme.org/The_Fauci_Files.htm

Now there's yet another piglet of a personality who will be written
about one day in Medicine's History books. Synonym for the word fool
and "debasing one's profession" will be read in close association to
his name.

Names like Steere, Klempner and Wormser? The writers will associate
with Tuskegee "Bad Blood" and Joseph Mengele.


I am hardly the first person to have said these things. They were said
long before I had a clue what was going on and even before I found out
what I had was Lyme and that I had given it to my kids:
http://www.actionlyme.org/Schoen.htm

http://www.actionlyme.org/BURRASCNO_TESTIMONY_1993.htm

Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources
August 5, 1993
430 Dirksen, 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM


"There is a core group of university-based Lyme disease researchers and
physicians whose opinions carry a great deal of weight. Unfortunately
many of them act unscientifically and unethically. They adhere to
outdated, self-serving views and attempt to personally discredit those
whose opinions differ from their own. They exert strong ethically
questionable influence on medical journals, which enables them to
publish and promote articles that are badly flawed. They work with
government agencies to bias the agenda of consensus meetings, and have
worked to exclude from these meetings and scientific seminars those
with alternate opinions. They behave this way for reasons of personal
or professional gain, and are involved in obvious conflicts of
interest. ...



KMDickson
23 Garden Street
Pawcatuck, CT "USA"
http://www.actionlyme.org

Ertedtard

2006-11-16, 7:58 am

Shakira is having sex!
http://shakiranudeworld.info/movies/1
Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com