|
Home > Archive > Hepatitis disease > September 2005 > Re: What kind of relationship is there between creation and science ?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: What kind of relationship is there between creation and science ?
|
|
|
| In article <nC1Xe.338466$_o.245589@attbi_s71>, george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com
(George) wrote:
>
> "Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud" <mining_pioneer@remove.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:dghn2i$ef4$1@apollon.grec.isp.9tel.net...
>
> Nonsense. It is not the mother of all science. On the contrary. Geology
> is the bastard step-child of science. Like the English language is to the
> romance languages, Geology is an amalgam of many scientific disciplines.
> Geology requires knowledge of physics, chemistry, biology, and mathematics.
Yes, that's right! Wassamatter? Are *you* not up to it? Aren't you good enough
at all those things?
>
> By the way, please refrain from changing your identity with every other
> post. It is a sure sign of a looney, and annoys the hell out of those of
> us who wish you to remain in our killfile. But then, you knew that
> already, didn't you, JP? :-)
Hey, I just love changing Identity too. I especially enjoyed being A. Melon and
it sure as hell upset this foul-mouthed New York lawyer I know. *snigger*
And I made him a web-page too, called "This is America":
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/mylinks.html
Alan
http://veloceraptor.blogspot.com/
http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
http://www.stopwar.org.uk/
http://www.700women.org/
|
| |
|
|