Home > Archive > Hepatitis disease > September 2005 > MRI Better Than FDG PET At Detecting Liver Tumors





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author MRI Better Than FDG PET At Detecting Liver Tumors
Alan

2005-09-24, 2:09 pm

Significantly more and smaller liver tumors can be detected by contrast-enhanced
MRI when compared to whole-body FDG PET, say researchers from Massachusetts
General Hospital in Boston.

For the study, the researchers analyzed 79 liver tumors in 30 patients. MRI
detected all 79 of the lesions, of which 33 were less than 1 cm. PET detected 65
lesions, of which only 12 were less than 1 cm. In a per-lesion analysis, MRI had
an accuracy rate of 75.5% compared to 64.1% for PET.

“FDG PET has been shown to be an excellent tool for gastrointestinal cancer
staging, but its role in the detection of liver metastases had not been
established. Contrast-enhanced MRI, on the other hand, is considered a sensitive
imaging technique for liver lesion depiction,” said Dushyant V. Sahani, MD, lead
author of the study. “We compared the two because we wanted to determine which
imaging method was better for finding liver metastases,” he said.

According to the study authors, patients who undergo successful liver resection
have an expected five-year survival rate of about 33% and a five-year
disease-free survival rate of 22%. “Knowing the number, size and location of the
lesions in the liver is critical, because that is what determines treatment,”
said Dr. Sahani.

“FDG-PET is currently very popular for looking for metastases, but it has
deficiencies. Based on our results, we believe that contrast-enhanced MRI should
be the imaging method of choice for determining if patients with colon and
pancreatic cancer have disease that has spread into their liver. However, FDG
PET provides additional information about disease outside of the liver and
sometimes both examinations may be complementary and indeed necessary for
complete, accurate staging,” said Dr. Sahani.

The study appears in the July 2005 issue of the American Journal of
Roentgenology.

The original news release can be found here
http://www.arrs.org/scriptcontent/p...05/r050706a.cfm


Alan

http://veloceraptor.blogspot.com/

http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/

http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/

http://www.stopwar.org.uk/

http://www.700women.org/
Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com