Hepatitis disease - Congratulations Lynne - Was: Hoof Goes RL *again* Re: Ping Kali

Author

Congratulations Lynne - Was: Hoof Goes RL *again* Re: Ping Kali

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <Xns96385FDB52941LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net>
ThePsyko <ThePsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
>
<SNIP> Oh look what you said just dissapeared.

> ThePsyko

Hey Lynne, I think they are going to give you another award and
actually *vote* for you.

Damn you is something else. I've been trying to get one for ages
and the closest I ever got was that Golden Killfile for *all*
*anonymous* *remailers*

And I would swear I can now hear the sound of egg dripping
slowly off somebodies face and onto the floor of their plush
office, but it aint really *their* office cos they is *just* a
paid employee too.

Firebird

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:23:06 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <Xns96385FDB52941LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net>
> ThePsyko <ThePsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
> <SNIP> Oh look what you said just dissapeared.
>
>
> Hey Lynne, I think they are going to give you another award and
> actually *vote* for you.
>
> Damn you is something else. I've been trying to get one for ages
> and the closest I ever got was that Golden Killfile for *all*
> *anonymous* *remailers*
>
> And I would swear I can now hear the sound of egg dripping
> slowly off somebodies face and onto the floor of their plush
> office, but it aint really *their* office cos they is *just* a
> paid employee too.
>
> Firebird

Hypocrite, you just complained about xposting, and here you went and did it
again.

Too bad you're jealous of paid employee's, do tell me why that is a bad
thing. Eh?

ThePsyko

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On 14 Apr 2005 in sci.psychology.psychotherapy, Iceman
<1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> made their contribution to mankind by stating in
news:e6dq2ersfamy.dlg@gl4c13r.org:

> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:23:06 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:
>
>
> Hypocrite, you just complained about xposting, and here you went and
> did it again.
>
> Too bad you're jealous of paid employee's, do tell me why that is a
> bad thing. Eh?
>

because the only job he can get is as an unpaid intern?

--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
http://prozac.iscool.net

hoofprints

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

ThePsyko wrote:
>
> On 14 Apr 2005 in sci.psychology.psychotherapy, Iceman
> <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> made their contribution to mankind by stating in
> news:e6dq2ersfamy.dlg@gl4c13r.org:
>
>
> because the only job he can get is as an unpaid intern?

I am trying to find an appropriate place in this thread to post a link
which pretty much sums up my feelings about SPP. and their Reverse Zero
tolerance game.
What they don't like is when Zero Tolerance is reversed on them and
thrown in their faces, yet they are hell bent on destruction of others
personalities which is not conducive to self actualization.
Anyway here is one link there are more if you run searches for Malow's
Hierarchy of Needs.

http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/maslow.html

hoof
>
> --
> ThePsyko
> Public Enemy #7
> http://prozac.iscool.net

--

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}

A Free Thinker.

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <e6dq2ersfamy.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:23:06 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:
>
>
> Hypocrite, you just complained about xposting, and here you went and did it
> again.

Spp Snecked. Ok now Iceman?

>
> Too bad you're jealous of paid employee's, do tell me why that is a bad
> thing. Eh?

That particular part is very personal, and between me and him,
but as you ask, a paid employee should respect his employer's
property, and not be using it for things he shouldn't be doing
or he can't complain when he finds himself getting the bullet,
while I work for myself, and I can work when I want, and as long
and hard as I want, or I can have a holiday if I want, and this
computer is mine, bought and paid for in good hard cash, and I
can use it for whatever I want, whenever I want. And even when I
was a paid employee, I *never* let anybody give me a pay cut, I
just walked straight out the door and I had a higher paid job
within a week, and anybody who would take a pay cut is *just* a
*slave* to his employer, and while you can respect a paid
servant who is good at his job, how can anybdy respect somebody
who is willing to be a slave?

Alan

hoofprints

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

"A.Melon" wrote:
>
> In article <e6dq2ersfamy.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Spp Snecked. Ok now Iceman?
>
>
> That particular part is very personal, and between me and him,
> but as you ask, a paid employee should respect his employer's
> property, and not be using it for things he shouldn't be doing
> or he can't complain when he finds himself getting the bullet,
> while I work for myself, and I can work when I want, and as long
> and hard as I want, or I can have a holiday if I want, and this
> computer is mine, bought and paid for in good hard cash, and I
> can use it for whatever I want, whenever I want. And even when I
> was a paid employee, I *never* let anybody give me a pay cut, I
> just walked straight out the door and I had a higher paid job
> within a week, and anybody who would take a pay cut is *just* a
> *slave* to his employer, and while you can respect a paid
> servant who is good at his job, how can anybdy respect somebody
> who is willing to be a slave?
>
> Alan

And this incident is even worse, as they are playing with Taxpayers
monies for personal and private business.
maybe I should take it to the streets!? Or at least the State
Controllers Office in Sac., but no, I kept it an in-house, Dept. to
Dept. thing, and they were given a choice of a verbal or written
reprimand.
Thing is they do zero tolerance on their inmates and private citizens,
and then can't even follow their own bloody rules.
hoof

--

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}

A Free Thinker.

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:35:54 -0700, hoofprints wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> ThePsyko wrote:
>
> I am trying to find an appropriate place in this thread to post a link
> which pretty much sums up my feelings about SPP. and their Reverse Zero
> tolerance game.
> What they don't like is when Zero Tolerance is reversed on them and
> thrown in their faces, yet they are hell bent on destruction of others
> personalities which is not conducive to self actualization.
> Anyway here is one link there are more if you run searches for Malow's
> Hierarchy of Needs.
>
> http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/maslow.html
>
> hoof

Excuse me Lynne, but you are an idiot. RZT when it's totally built on lies,
paranoia, etc. seems logical only to the ill informed, kooks, and the
mentally deficient. If a lie is told a 1000 times it is still a lie. I
suppose tho this is why some wimmin have to constantly be told how pretty
or valuable so eventually they will believe the deceit.

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <1a2be8tbtjai2$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Excuse me Lynne, but you are an idiot. RZT when it's totally built on lies,
> paranoia, etc. seems logical only to the ill informed, kooks, and the
> mentally deficient. If a lie is told a 1000 times it is still a lie. I
> suppose tho this is why some wimmin have to constantly be told how pretty
> or valuable so eventually they will believe the deceit.

Excuse me Iceman, but you are a sexist, for some men too have to be constantly
reassured in order to function too, and once the source of their support ceases
to support them, then their entire little world comes crashing down about their
ears, and they will end up living in a hovel, or worse.

Yaknow I just thought I would stop a while to reflect on how *good* life is.

I own my house, mortage nearly paid off, two vehicles on the drive both less
than two years old, and running my own business and having to take a month off
to avoid going into the higher tax band, and I can afford my phone bill, and I
have a woman who loves me, and I her, and *we* laugh *long* and *hard* Iceman.
Ah life is so damn good Iceman. Yaknow, I was considering using one of my three
computers to run a remailer in my spare time.

Firebird

hoofprints

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Iceman wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:35:54 -0700, hoofprints wrote:
>
>
> Excuse me Lynne, but you are an idiot. RZT when it's totally built on lies,
> paranoia, etc. seems logical only to the ill informed, kooks, and the
> mentally deficient. If a lie is told a 1000 times it is still a lie. I
> suppose tho this is why some wimmin have to constantly be told how pretty
> or valuable so eventually they will believe the deceit.

Tsk, tsk. I see you taking things at face value, see only black and
white and cannot read something and apply it elsewhere in your life or
studies to formulate your own opinion.
how sad.
hoof

--

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}

A Free Thinker.

hoofprints

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

"A.Melon" wrote:
>
> In article <1a2be8tbtjai2$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Excuse me Iceman, but you are a sexist, for some men too have to be constantly
> reassured in order to function too, and once the source of their support ceases
> to support them, then their entire little world comes crashing down about their
> ears, and they will end up living in a hovel, or worse.
>
> Yaknow I just thought I would stop a while to reflect on how *good* life is.
>
> I own my house, mortage nearly paid off, two vehicles on the drive both less
> than two years old, and running my own business and having to take a month off
> to avoid going into the higher tax band, and I can afford my phone bill, and I
> have a woman who loves me, and I her, and *we* laugh *long* and *hard* Iceman.
> Ah life is so damn good Iceman. Yaknow, I was considering using one of my three
> computers to run a remailer in my spare time.
>
> Firebird

Damn, I guess I am bored with Iceman posts, cuz I thought he was
speaking of Maslows Hierarchy of Needs, instead he speaks of how
difficult it is for him to recognize and praise the women in his life,
because it is........
I guess that he just can't even muster one positive statement a day
about his partner, instead he dwells on the negatives and rips them
apart because his teeny widdle ego demands that he posture himself as
an All Knowing Master. Besides if he built them up too high, they might
find out how wonderful they are and find someone new.
hoof

--

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}

A Free Thinker.

Linda

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

hoofprints wrote:
> "A.Melon" wrote:
built on lies,[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
lie. I[vbcol=seagreen]
how pretty[vbcol=seagreen]
constantly[vbcol=seagreen]
support ceases[vbcol=seagreen]
about their[vbcol=seagreen]
life is.[vbcol=seagreen]
both less[vbcol=seagreen]
a month off[vbcol=seagreen]
bill, and I[vbcol=seagreen]
*hard* Iceman.[vbcol=seagreen]
of my three[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Damn, I guess I am bored with Iceman posts,

This weeks screed is the most degenerate yet.

cuz I thought he was
> speaking of Maslows Hierarchy of Needs, instead he speaks of how
> difficult it is for him to recognize and praise the women in his
life,
> because it is........
> I guess that he just can't even muster one positive statement a day
> about his partner, instead he dwells on the negatives and rips them
> apart because his teeny widdle ego demands that he posture himself
as
> an All Knowing Master. Besides if he built them up too high, they
might
> find out how wonderful they are and find someone new.

The SPP stalkers are unable to grasp the reality they can't lift
themselves out of their cesspool by splashing their shit on other
people.

Cujo DeSockpuppet

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

"Linda" <adinllinda@aol.com> wrote in
news:1113758024.943083.94140@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

>
> hoofprints wrote:
> built on lies,
> the
> lie. I
> how pretty
> constantly
> support ceases
> about their
> life is.
> both less
> a month off
> bill, and I
> *hard* Iceman.
> of my three
>
> This weeks screed is the most degenerate yet.
>
> cuz I thought he was
> life,
> as
> might
>
> The SPP stalkers are unable to grasp the reality they can't lift
> themselves out of their cesspool by splashing their shit on other
> people.

It's sufficient to keep my head above the waterline by standing on your
shoulders, you witch.

--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in
dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych.
Winner of the 8/2000 & 2/2003 HL&S award. Hail Petitmorte!
Colonel of the Fanatic Legion. FL# 555-PLNTY Motto: ABUNDANCE!.
Charter Member - Digital Brownshirts and Library Gestapo.
"Now that Google will be established as a "foundational aspect" of the
Internet, my work is secure and referenceable for many years to come.
Just as I planned it." - Edmo plots his immortality via Google.

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:39:14 -0700, hoofprints wrote:

> Iceman wrote:
>
> Tsk, tsk. I see you taking things at face value, see only black and
> white and cannot read something and apply it elsewhere in your life or
> studies to formulate your own opinion.
> how sad.
> hoof

Sad? lol, What is sad is that you are one of those who knows it is a lie
but chooses to believe it anyhow. The sad part of it is that you no longer
know the difference between truth and lies so you go off on tangents and
see things that aren't. The confusion leads to uncertainty so you take the
defensive stance at start flailing out at any perceived threats as if they
were a reality.

Yes, I'd far rather go with black n white. I can afford to as I have
understanding skills.

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:58:36 -0700, hoofprints wrote:

> "A.Melon" wrote:
>
> Damn, I guess I am bored with Iceman posts, cuz I thought he was
> speaking of Maslows Hierarchy of Needs, instead he speaks of how
> difficult it is for him to recognize and praise the women in his life,
> because it is........

<snicker> Too bad life dealt you such blows that you do not recognize that
one does not have to lie to praise.

> I guess that he just can't even muster one positive statement a day
> about his partner, instead he dwells on the negatives and rips them
> apart because his teeny widdle ego demands that he posture himself as
> an All Knowing Master. Besides if he built them up too high, they might
> find out how wonderful they are and find someone new.
> hoof

LMAO! This is a rather obvious example of projections.

I'm still married to the first woman I married, and yes, we still hold
hands when we go out.

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On 17 Apr 2005 10:13:44 -0700, Linda wrote:

> hoofprints wrote:
> built on lies,
> the
> lie. I
> how pretty
> constantly
> support ceases
> about their
> life is.
> both less
> a month off
> bill, and I
> *hard* Iceman.
> of my three
>
> This weeks screed is the most degenerate yet.
>
> cuz I thought he was
> life,
> as
> might
>
> The SPP stalkers are unable to grasp the reality they can't lift
> themselves out of their cesspool by splashing their shit on other
> people.

LMAO! GEE! Two...TWO projections in a row!

Linda

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Liceman wrote:
>
> The sad part of it is that I lie so much that I no longer know the
difference between truth and lies.

Confession is good for the soul, Liceman.

Linda

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Iceman wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:58:36 -0700, hoofprints wrote:
>
built on lies,[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
lie. I[vbcol=seagreen]
how pretty[vbcol=seagreen]
be constantly[vbcol=seagreen]
support ceases[vbcol=seagreen]
down about their[vbcol=seagreen]
*good* life is.[vbcol=seagreen]
both less[vbcol=seagreen]
a month off[vbcol=seagreen]
bill, and I[vbcol=seagreen]
*hard* Iceman.[vbcol=seagreen]
one of my three[vbcol=seagreen]
life,[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> <snicker> Too bad life dealt you such blows that you do not recognize
that
> one does not have to lie to praise.
>
as[vbcol=seagreen]
might[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> LMAO! This is a rather obvious example of projections.
>
> I'm still married to the first woman I married, and yes, we still
hold
> hands when we go out.

Any woman who would partner up and remain married to a sick, twisted,
cyberstalking creep like you is an extremely sick woman.

http://www.healthyplace.com/communi...ssism/faq6.html

The Typical Narcissistic Mate/Partner/Spouse.

First and foremost, the narcissist's partner must have a deficient or a
distorted grasp of her self and of reality. Otherwise, she (or he) is
bound to abandon the narcissist's ship early on. The cognitive
distortion is likely to consist of belittling and demeaning herself -
while aggrandising and adoring the narcissist. The partner is, thus,
placing himself in the position of the eternal victim: undeserving,
punishable, a scapegoat. Sometimes, it is very important to the partner
to appear moral, sacrificial and victimised. At other times, she is not
even aware of this predicament. The narcissist is perceived by the
partner to be a person in the position to demand these sacrifices from
her partner, being superior in many ways (intellectually, emotionally,
morally, financially).

The status of professional victim sits well with the partner's tendency
to punish herself, namely: with her masochistic streak. The tormented
life with the narcissist is, as far as the partner is aware, a just
punitive measure.

In this respect, the partner is the mirror image of the narcissist. By
maintaining a symbiotic relationship with him, by being totally
dependent upon the source of masochistic supply (which the narcissist
most reliably constitutes and most amply provides) - the partner
enhances certain traits and encourages certain behaviours, which are at
the very core of narcissism.

The narcissist is never whole without an adoring, submissive,
available, self-denigrating partner. His very sense of superiority,
indeed his False Self, depends on it. His sadistic Superego switches
its attentions from the narcissist (in whom it often provokes suicidal
ideation) to the partner, thus finally obtaining an alternative source
of sadistic satisfaction.

It is through self-denial that the partner survives. She denies her
wishes, hopes, dreams, aspirations, sexual, psychological and material
needs, and much else besides. She perceives her needs as threatening
because they might engender the wrath of the narcissist's God-like
supreme figure. The narcissist is rendered in her eyes even more
superior through and because of this self-denial. Self-denial
undertaken to facilitate and ease the life of a "great man" is more
palatable. The "greater" the man (=the narcissist), the easier it is
for the partner to ignore her own self, to dwindle, to degenerate, to
turn into an appendix of the narcissist and, finally, to become nothing
but an extension, to merge with the narcissist to the point of oblivion
and of dim memories of one's self.

The two collaborate in this macabre dance. The narcissist is formed by
his partner inasmuch as he forms her. Submission breeds superiority and
masochism breeds sadism. The relationships are characterised by rampant
emergentism: roles are allocated almost from the start and any
deviation meets with an aggressive, even violent reaction.

The predominant state of the partner's mind is utter confusion. Even
the most basic relationships - with husband, children, or parents -
remain bafflingly obscured by the giant shadow cast by the intensive
interaction with the narcissist. A suspension of judgement is part and
parcel of a suspension of individuality, which is both a prerequisite
to and the result of living with a narcissist. The partner no longer
knows what is true and right and what is wrong and forbidden.

The narcissist recreates for the partner the sort of emotional ambience
that led to his own formation in the first place: capriciousness,
fickleness, arbitrariness, emotional (and physical or sexual)
abandonment. The world becomes uncertain and frightening and the
partner has only one thing to cling to: the narcissist.

And cling she does. If there is anything which can safely be said about
those who emotionally team up with narcissists, it is that they are
overtly and overly dependent.

Linda

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Iceman wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2005 10:13:44 -0700, Linda wrote:
>
and[vbcol=seagreen]
be[vbcol=seagreen]
down[vbcol=seagreen]
*good*[vbcol=seagreen]
drive[vbcol=seagreen]
take[vbcol=seagreen]
phone[vbcol=seagreen]
one[vbcol=seagreen]
day[vbcol=seagreen]
them[vbcol=seagreen]
himself[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> LMAO! GEE! Two...TWO projections in a row!

Your denial and unwillingness to assume responsibility for your
criminal tresspasses is getting old!

boring, too!

It's always someone else whose to blame for your behaving badly.

It's brad's fault
It's hoof's fault
It's linda's fault

We put a gun to your head and FORCE you to read our posts.
We put a gun to your head and FORCED you to post non-stop libelous lies
and false accusations about us.
We put a gun to your head and FORCED you to post post intended to make
us feel threatened.
We put a gun to your head and FORCE you to post our personally
identifying information.
We put a gun to your head and FORCED you to post maps to our and our
children's home (requiring a child to make yet another alteration in
their real life.)

You have zero control over yourself.

Total strangers are MAKING you do all these things and much more.

Your targets are all responsible for all your criminal tresspasses,
and/or your violating others civil rights, right?

Our participating in a medium WE have every right to participate in is
FORCING you to commit crimes against us, right?

What powerful people your targets are!

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On 17 Apr 2005 11:05:10 -0700, Linda wrote:

> Iceman wrote:
> built on lies,
> the
> lie. I
> how pretty
> be constantly
> support ceases
> down about their
> *good* life is.
> both less
> a month off
> bill, and I
> *hard* Iceman.
> one of my three
> life,
> that
> as
> might
> hold
>
> Any woman who would partner up and remain married to a sick, twisted,
> cyberstalking creep like you is an extremely sick woman.

Linda, you are overstepping your bounds here so I snipped the rest.
If you want to bring Collins into this, fine. It is your choice.

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On 17 Apr 2005 10:53:22 -0700, Linda wrote:

> Liceman wrote:
> difference between truth and lies.
>
> Confession is good for the soul, Liceman.

True, but your post editing and lies are not.

Are you laboring under guilt because of your Andrew episode? After that
experience you changed quite a bit, and for the worse. Here is a copy of
the original reply
==================
Sad? lol, What is sad is that you are one of those who knows it is a lie
but chooses to believe it anyhow. The sad part of it is that you no longer
know the difference between truth and lies so you go off on tangents and
see things that aren't. The confusion leads to uncertainty so you take the
defensive stance at start flailing out at any perceived threats as if they
were a reality.

Yes, I'd far rather go with black n white. I can afford to as I have
understanding skills.
===================

I was surprised to see that you posted lies stating that you were off the
gambling kick, yet in another group posting that you were and why. Well
mebbe not really, I guess I was mistakingly rooting for you to be free of
that. Sad, isn't it.

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On 17 Apr 2005 11:40:34 -0700, Linda wrote:

> Iceman wrote:
> and
> be
> down
> *good*
> drive
> take
> phone
> one
> day
> them
> himself
>
> Your denial and unwillingness to assume responsibility for your
> criminal tresspasses is getting old!
>
> boring, too!
>
> It's always someone else whose to blame for your behaving badly.
>
> It's brad's fault
> It's hoof's fault
> It's linda's fault
>
> We put a gun to your head and FORCE you to read our posts.
> We put a gun to your head and FORCED you to post non-stop libelous lies
> and false accusations about us.
> We put a gun to your head and FORCED you to post post intended to make
> us feel threatened.
> We put a gun to your head and FORCE you to post our personally
> identifying information.
> We put a gun to your head and FORCED you to post maps to our and our
> children's home (requiring a child to make yet another alteration in
> their real life.)
>

Excuse me? Post proof ignoramus. You are lying again and your false
perceptions does not make it so.

> You have zero control over yourself.
>
> Total strangers are MAKING you do all these things and much more.
>
> Your targets are all responsible for all your criminal tresspasses,
> and/or your violating others civil rights, right?
>
> Our participating in a medium WE have every right to participate in is
> FORCING you to commit crimes against us, right?
>
> What powerful people your targets are!

I have no targets. You're sick Linda.

hoofprints

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Linda wrote:
>
> hoofprints wrote:
> built on lies,
> the
> lie. I
> how pretty
> constantly
> support ceases
> about their
> life is.
> both less
> a month off
> bill, and I
> *hard* Iceman.
> of my three
>
> This weeks screed is the most degenerate yet.

I haven't been reading them. I am almost afraid to look because they
are so full of *hit, it would take a fire hose hooked up to the fire
hydrant to clean it up.
( I wonder if *ice*man would fit through the sewer if he got knocked off
his feet and pushed down into the gutter where he belongs, or will the
street cleaner need to come around and brush him down the drains?)

>
> cuz I thought he was
> life,
> as
> might
>
> The SPP stalkers are unable to grasp the reality they can't lift
> themselves out of their cesspool by splashing their shit on other
> people.

Oh they HATE it when you call them Stalkers!! They can't adjust to
reality, yaknow...
hoof

--

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}

A Free Thinker.

Kali

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <426295BC.CB610A3C@hotmail.com>, posted Sun, 17 Apr
2005 09:58:36 -0700, hoofprints equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
says...

>
>
>"A.Melon" wrote:
[...]

>Damn, I guess I am bored with Iceman posts, cuz I thought he was
>speaking of Maslows Hierarchy of Needs, instead he speaks of how
>difficult it is for him to recognize and praise the women in his life,

Where did he say that, Goofy? Must you twist everything you
read and make it personal? Here's the quote:

"I suppose tho this is why some wimmin have to constantly be
told how pretty or valuable so eventually they will believe the
deceit."

He was stating an observation that he has made. I've made the
same observation of *some* women, too.

>because it is........
>I guess that he just can't even muster one positive statement a day
>about his partner, instead he dwells on the negatives and rips them
>apart because his teeny widdle ego demands that he posture himself as
>an All Knowing Master. Besides if he built them up too high, they might
>find out how wonderful they are and find someone new.
>hoof

Look how far afield you ran with your reading comprehension
error and distorted thinking. Sheesh.

Kali
--
"But I don't want to go among mad people,"
Alice remarked. "Oh, you can't help that,"
said the Cat, "we're all mad here. I'm mad.
You're mad." -Lewis Carroll

hoofprints

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Iceman wrote:
>
> On 17 Apr 2005 11:40:34 -0700, Linda wrote:
>
>
> Excuse me? Post proof ignoramus. You are lying again and your false
> perceptions does not make it so.

Linda,
He doesn't understand what you stated in written word, he may be the
*ice*man but he is really a blockhead, and if you chip away at his ice
facade he would be nothing.
hoof
>
>
> I have no targets. You're sick Linda.

--

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}

A Free Thinker.

hoofprints

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Kali wrote:
>
> In article <426295BC.CB610A3C@hotmail.com>, posted Sun, 17 Apr
> 2005 09:58:36 -0700, hoofprints equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> says...
>
> [...]
>
>
> Where did he say that, Goofy? Must you twist everything you
> read and make it personal? Here's the quote:
>
> "I suppose tho this is why some wimmin have to constantly be
> told how pretty or valuable so eventually they will believe the
> deceit."
>
> He was stating an observation that he has made. I've made the
> same observation of *some* women, too.

Yes, but he is speaking of personal relationships, not business
relationships and there is a difference as you well know.
There is nothing wrong with thanking someone who is important in your
life or telling them you care about them be it a hug, kiss or smooch.
hoof
>
>
> Look how far afield you ran with your reading comprehension
> error and distorted thinking. Sheesh.
>
> Kali
> --
> "But I don't want to go among mad people,"
> Alice remarked. "Oh, you can't help that,"
> said the Cat, "we're all mad here. I'm mad.
> You're mad." -Lewis Carroll

--

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}

A Free Thinker.

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:12:15 -0700, hoofprints wrote:

> Iceman wrote:
>
> Linda,
> He doesn't understand what you stated in written word, he may be the
> *ice*man but he is really a blockhead, and if you chip away at his ice
> facade he would be nothing.
> hoof

Oh I understood alright but there was no truth to any of it. If you choose
to believe it that's your prerogative. It will come back to bite you on
your XXX though.
[vbcol=seagreen]

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:49:14 -0700, hoofprints wrote:

> Linda wrote:
>
> I haven't been reading them. I am almost afraid to look because they
> are so full of *hit, it would take a fire hose hooked up to the fire
> hydrant to clean it up.
> ( I wonder if *ice*man would fit through the sewer if he got knocked off
> his feet and pushed down into the gutter where he belongs, or will the
> street cleaner need to come around and brush him down the drains?)
>
>
> Oh they HATE it when you call them Stalkers!! They can't adjust to
> reality, yaknow...
> hoof

LOL, like anyone gives a rats XXX what a 'orse molester thinks.

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:15:52 -0700, hoofprints wrote:

> Kali wrote:
>
> Yes, but he is speaking of personal relationships, not business
> relationships and there is a difference as you well know.
> There is nothing wrong with thanking someone who is important in your
> life or telling them you care about them be it a hug, kiss or smooch.
> hoof

In my case I can do it without lying. Shame you were never in that
position, sad really. I mean how hard up does a person have to be to accept
lies to make them feel better.

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <426295BC.CB610A3C@hotmail.com>
hoofprints <equsphotogophr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Damn, I guess I am bored with Iceman posts, cuz I thought he was
> speaking of Maslows Hierarchy of Needs, instead he speaks of how
> difficult it is for him to recognize and praise the women in his life,
> because it is........
> I guess that he just can't even muster one positive statement a day
> about his partner, instead he dwells on the negatives and rips them
> apart because his teeny widdle ego demands that he posture himself as
> an All Knowing Master. Besides if he built them up too high, they might
> find out how wonderful they are and find someone new.
> hoof

Sorry, but the other matter is now out of my hands now so I had to cut it.

But you are right about Iceman, and you notice Kali laps it up, so what have we
got rearing it's ugly head once again? And he did get so upset when you pointed
out the other meaning of SMDH.

Hey, life is so damn good today Lynne. I trust you are having a wonderful
weekend too.

Alan

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:27:30 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <426295BC.CB610A3C@hotmail.com>
> hoofprints <equsphotogophr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, but the other matter is now out of my hands now so I had to cut it.
>
> But you are right about Iceman, and you notice Kali laps it up, so what have we
> got rearing it's ugly head once again? And he did get so upset when you pointed
> out the other meaning of SMDH.
>
> Hey, life is so damn good today Lynne. I trust you are having a wonderful
> weekend too.
>
> Alan

So what you are admitting to is that you lie to your women too? Damn boi!
Are they that uglee, old or fat? If you respected yourself a little more
you might be able to pick up something a little more desirable. But Heh!
Every man to his own taste! said the farmer as he kissed the cow.

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <bou92hujff6b$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> On 17 Apr 2005 11:05:10 -0700, Linda wrote:
>
>
> Linda, you are overstepping your bounds here so I snipped the rest.
> If you want to bring Collins into this, fine. It is your choice.

She tells the truth Liceman. Hey, I'll even tell you what you are going to say
next;

"You know nothing about me."

Go on, say it, Liceman, but she tells the truth

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <110ue21oip8he$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:58:36 -0700, hoofprints wrote:
>
>
>
> LMAO! This is a rather obvious example of projections.
>
> I'm still married to the first woman I married, and yes, we still hold
> hands when we go out.

Yes, but sooner or later she will wake up and realise what a Momma's boy she
married.

Believe me, I am an *expert* in these things, and as for the one who woke up????

Never fear, she's in good hands now.

Alan

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:45:23 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <bou92hujff6b$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> She tells the truth Liceman. Hey, I'll even tell you what you are going to say
> next;
>
> "You know nothing about me."
>
> Go on, say it, Liceman, but she tells the truth

Hey, you two would get along just fine. You both have hyper thyroids and
should be able to understand each other clearly, heaven knows no one else
can.

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <ockcc7qt1v8o$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Sad? lol, What is sad is that you are one of those who knows it is a lie
> but chooses to believe it anyhow. The sad part of it is that you no longer
> know the difference between truth and lies so you go off on tangents and
> see things that aren't. The confusion leads to uncertainty so you take the
> defensive stance at start flailing out at any perceived threats as if they
> were a reality.

Hell Iceman that is the second case of severe *projection* I have seen in as
many days, and in both cases it was a sad excuse for a male from Planet America.

I'll tell you as I told the other one. *We* will still be *laughing* long and
hard after you're in the ground, although by then we won't be laughing at you,
because we will have forgotten you and found something else to laugh about.

>
> Yes, I'd far rather go with black n white. I can afford to as I have
> understanding skills.

What are you on about now? Have you only got a black and white TV or something?
You should try a colour set yaknow *and* they come in stereo these days too.

Alan

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:43:27 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <ockcc7qt1v8o$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Hell Iceman that is the second case of severe *projection* I have seen in as
> many days, and in both cases it was a sad excuse for a male from Planet America.
>
> I'll tell you as I told the other one. *We* will still be *laughing* long and
> hard after you're in the ground, although by then we won't be laughing at you,
> because we will have forgotten you and found something else to laugh about.
>
>
> What are you on about now? Have you only got a black and white TV or something?
> You should try a colour set yaknow *and* they come in stereo these days too.
>
> Alan

Ya know Alan, you're getting really laame at this stuff.

Oh and as to TV's I don't know where you've been but we have surround sound
5,6,7:1 and Hi Def plus big screen and TV plasma monitors. Might be a bit
much for that small place you live in tho.

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <4262C31F.9B520D9D@hotmail.com>
hoofprints <equsphotogophr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Linda,
> He doesn't understand what you stated in written word, he may be the
> *ice*man but he is really a blockhead, and if you chip away at his ice
> facade he would be nothing.
> hoof

Linda has it right. It's *Liceman*

If he weren't a louse he would clear-off and leave our newsgroup alone.

Alan

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <15jmlk74iagz2$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Oh I understood alright but there was no truth to any of it. If you choose
> to believe it that's your prerogative. It will come back to bite you on
> your XXX though.

No you don't understand. The majority of the people who came to this newsgroup
with Hoof and I are *DEAD* Iceman. Dead of a disease they can't cure. WTF is it
that you think you can do that is gonna bite us on the XXX? Not a goddam
thing. Now piss off Liceman.

Alan

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:42:54 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <15jmlk74iagz2$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> No you don't understand. The majority of the people who came to this newsgroup
> with Hoof and I are *DEAD* Iceman. Dead of a disease they can't cure. WTF is it
> that you think you can do that is gonna bite us on the XXX? Not a goddam
> thing. Now piss off Liceman.
>
> Alan

Then you'd be wise to make peace with the maker, and walk peaceably with
all men such as is possible.

Then sign your posts, "Walking Green Man"

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <d3uf3a$nt$7@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
Kali <kali@lart.com> wrote:
>
> In article <426295BC.CB610A3C@hotmail.com>, posted Sun, 17 Apr
> 2005 09:58:36 -0700, hoofprints equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> says...
>
>
> Where did he say that, Goofy? Must you twist everything you
> read and make it personal? Here's the quote:
>
> "I suppose tho this is why some wimmin have to constantly be
> told how pretty or valuable so eventually they will believe the
> deceit."
>
> He was stating an observation that he has made. I've made the
> same observation of *some* women, too.
>
>
> Look how far afield you ran with your reading comprehension
> error and distorted thinking. Sheesh.
>
> Kali

Hey Lynne, it's so fascinating to watch now that Linda has explained the theory.
Watch how Kail provides support for Lices every action.

Hey thanks Linda.

Alan

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <sdqpean9hezv$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> On 17 Apr 2005 10:53:22 -0700, Linda wrote:
>
>
> True, but your post editing and lies are not.

Linda tells the truth Liceman. Stop wriggling.

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <1g80ba58ldvh4.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> On 17 Apr 2005 11:40:34 -0700, Linda wrote:
>

Aw shit, I missed out on the reckognition again.
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Excuse me? Post proof ignoramus. You are lying again and your false
> perceptions does not make it so.

You are the proof Liceman. Linda tells the truth.

>
> I have no targets. You're sick Linda.

*You* are sick Liceman. Linda tells the truth.

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:27:11 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <1g80ba58ldvh4.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Aw shit, I missed out on the reckognition again.
>
>
> You are the proof Liceman. Linda tells the truth.
>
>
> *You* are sick Liceman. Linda tells the truth.

You bored again?

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:12:08 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <sdqpean9hezv$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Linda tells the truth Liceman. Stop wriggling.

Yeppers, you're bored. LOL

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <1113760402.398147.128040@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
"Linda" <adinllinda@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> Liceman wrote:
> difference between truth and lies.
>
>
> Confession is good for the soul, Liceman.

Godammit, why didn't I think of that, Linda?

Liceman! ROFLMAO

Good one, and that should stick for good.

The Professor is gonna love it.

Alan

Linda

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

A.Melon wrote:
> In article <1113760402.398147.128040@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
> "Linda" <adinllinda@aol.com> wrote:
the[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Godammit, why didn't I think of that, Linda?
>
> Liceman! ROFLMAO
>
> Good one, and that should stick for good.
>
> The Professor is gonna love it.
>

I think it may have been The Professor who coined it.

But, I thought it was so apt, I coopted it and have been using it ever
since.

Linda

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Iceman wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2005 11:40:34 -0700, Linda wrote:
>
a[vbcol=seagreen]
told[vbcol=seagreen]
to[vbcol=seagreen]
their[vbcol=seagreen]
they[vbcol=seagreen]
lies[vbcol=seagreen]
make[vbcol=seagreen]
our[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Excuse me? Post proof ignoramus. You are lying again and your false
> perceptions does not make it so.
>
is[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> I have no targets.

Liar!

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <agvyngmf6xcm$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:

> Ya know Alan, you're getting really laame at this stuff.
>
> Oh and as to TV's I don't know where you've been but we have surround sound
> 5,6,7:1 and Hi Def plus big screen and TV plasma monitors. Might be a bit
> much for that small place you live in tho.

Idiota. I used to work for Alpine Electonics in case you had forgotten. A
Japanese company that prides itself on being the best producer of audio and
navigation systems in the whole world, and while America *thinks* it is years
ahead of the rest of the world at everything, anybody who knows anything at all
about electonics *knows* that Japan is about five years ahead of America. Don't
tell me what you got, cos it's about five years out of date.

Alan

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:17:57 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <agvyngmf6xcm$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
>
> Idiota. I used to work for Alpine Electonics in case you had forgotten. A
> Japanese company that prides itself on being the best producer of audio and
> navigation systems in the whole world, and while America *thinks* it is years
> ahead of the rest of the world at everything, anybody who knows anything at all
> about electonics *knows* that Japan is about five years ahead of America. Don't
> tell me what you got, cos it's about five years out of date.
>
> Alan

What an idiot, the stuff they have does not work over here. You also pumped
up your past job importance way too much. We all know what you did.

Your problem is I have it and you don't.

Japan is only a couple years ahead in some things. They are the beta
testers stoopid.

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <jt2r9pwwto7f.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:42:54 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:
>
>
> Then you'd be wise to make peace with the maker, and walk peaceably with
> all men such as is possible.

There's that screwed up organised religiosity again. Did Jesus walk peaceably
with the money changers? No he threw than out of the temple, and he didn't ever
walk peaceably with them, and he said to "go do likewise" but you idiots with
your organised religions, you don't know Jack shit.

Alan

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:50:38 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <jt2r9pwwto7f.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> There's that screwed up organised religiosity again. Did Jesus walk peaceably
> with the money changers? No he threw than out of the temple, and he didn't ever
> walk peaceably with them, and he said to "go do likewise" but you idiots with
> your organised religions, you don't know Jack shit.
>
> Alan

And what org might that be? U dunno? D'oh!

You obviously don't know what your talking about either. It's a cinch you
cannot prove it. LOL especially that "go do likewise" association.

BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

/shakes haid at da idjut.

LOL I'd bet you think Delilah cut off Samson's hair too! ROTFL!

Linda

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Iceman wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:15:52 -0700, hoofprints wrote:
>
life,[vbcol=seagreen]
your[vbcol=seagreen]
smooch.[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> In my case I can do it without lying.

You are only fooling yourself.

Anyone engaging in type of self-deception you do whole life is one big
fat lie!

Linda

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Iceman wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2005 10:53:22 -0700, Linda wrote:
>
>
> True, but your post editing and lies are not.
>
> Are you laboring under guilt because of your Andrew episode?

fter that
> experience you changed quite a bit, and for the worse. Here is a copy
of
> the original reply
> ==================
> Sad? lol, What is sad is that you are one of those who knows it is a
lie
> but chooses to believe it anyhow. The sad part of it is that you no
longer
> know the difference between truth and lies so you go off on tangents
and
> see things that aren't. The confusion leads to uncertainty so you
take the
> defensive stance at start flailing out at any perceived threats as if
they
> were a reality.
>

You can deny factual reality now til doomsday---if you want.

Your doing so will never alter the reality that you and the SPP
stlakers are compulsive liars...and, I will never ever ever You can
deny factual reality now til doomsday---, til The truth is all I have.
wI have NEVER ee

> Yes, I'd far rather go with black n white. I can afford to as I have
> understanding skills.
> ===================
>
> I was surprised to see that you posted lies stating that you were off
the
> gambling kick, yet in another group posting that you were and why.
Well
> mebbe not really, I guess I was mistakingly rooting for you to be
free of
> that. Sad, isn't it.

Your choosing to believe your own propaganda is your problem---not
mine.

My beef is with rogue mhp's trolling the www and recklessly endangering
other peoles lives.

hoofprints

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Iceman wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:12:15 -0700, hoofprints wrote:
>
>
> Oh I understood alright but there was no truth to any of it. If you choose
> to believe it that's your prerogative. It will come back to bite you on
> your XXX though.

Does this mean that you are entertaining the idea of dehumanizing me
more than you and your friends already have??
I doubt that you can react any lower than you already have towards
myself and others.
But go ahead, show the world just how big a jerk you can be.
hoof[vbcol=seagreen]
>

--

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}

A Free Thinker.

Linda

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

hoofprints wrote:
> Iceman wrote:
totally[vbcol=seagreen]
kooks,[vbcol=seagreen]
still a[vbcol=seagreen]
told[vbcol=seagreen]
have to[vbcol=seagreen]
their[vbcol=seagreen]
crashing[vbcol=seagreen]
how[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
to[vbcol=seagreen]
my[vbcol=seagreen]
and[vbcol=seagreen]
using[vbcol=seagreen]
how[vbcol=seagreen]
his[vbcol=seagreen]
statement a[vbcol=seagreen]
rips[vbcol=seagreen]
high, they[vbcol=seagreen]
lift[vbcol=seagreen]
other[vbcol=seagreen]
badly.[vbcol=seagreen]
libelous lies[vbcol=seagreen]
to make[vbcol=seagreen]
and our[vbcol=seagreen]
alteration in[vbcol=seagreen]
false[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
his ice[vbcol=seagreen]
choose[vbcol=seagreen]
you on[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Does this mean that you are entertaining the idea of dehumanizing me
> more than you and your friends already have??
> I doubt that you can react any lower than you already have towards
> myself and others.
> But go ahead, show the world just how big a jerk you can be.

Did the bastards ever try to extort $$$ from you?

In a message dated 4/18/2005 8:05:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
pjr@insurgent.org writes:
Message-ID: <1130486.1113836721510.JavaMail.wwwrun@web27.ims-firmen.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:05:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: pjr@insurgent.org
To: adinllinda@aol.com
Subject: Removal of your alt.usenet.kooks awards

Hello. This is Peter J Ross from the alt.usenet.kooks award program. I
am writing
to offer you the opportunity to have your name removed from all AUK
awards.
For a fee of $500, I will see to it that your name is removed
immediately. If
you want to proceed, let me know and we can discuss payment
arrangements.
Think it over.

Peter J Ross - Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler of AUK

alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

hoofprints

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

Linda wrote:
>
> hoofprints wrote:
> totally
> kooks,
> still a
> told
> have to
> their
> crashing
> how
> the
> to
> my
> and
> using
> how
> his
> statement a
> rips
> high, they
> lift
> other
> badly.
> libelous lies
> to make
> and our
> alteration in
> false
> the
> his ice
> choose
> you on
>
> Did the bastards ever try to extort $$$ from you?
>
> In a message dated 4/18/2005 8:05:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> pjr@insurgent.org writes:
> Message-ID: <1130486.1113836721510.JavaMail.wwwrun@web27.ims-firmen.de>
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:05:21 +0200 (CEST)
> From: pjr@insurgent.org
> To: adinllinda@aol.com
> Subject: Removal of your alt.usenet.kooks awards
>
> Hello. This is Peter J Ross from the alt.usenet.kooks award program. I
> am writing
> to offer you the opportunity to have your name removed from all AUK
> awards.
> For a fee of $500, I will see to it that your name is removed
> immediately. If
> you want to proceed, let me know and we can discuss payment
> arrangements.
> Think it over.
>
> Peter J Ross - Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler of AUK
>
> alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
> http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

************************************************************************

My God!!
Their lawlessness knows no bounds.
I don't recall if they have made this type of offer to me or anyone
else, they may have and I dismissed it as being another one of their
scams.
With this post, maybe someone in the legal field can actually do
something about cyberspace bandits.
hoof

--

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}

A Free Thinker.

Linda

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

hoofprints wrote:
> Linda wrote:
informed,[vbcol=seagreen]
is[vbcol=seagreen]
constantly be[vbcol=seagreen]
deceit.[vbcol=seagreen]
too[vbcol=seagreen]
of[vbcol=seagreen]
on[vbcol=seagreen]
on[vbcol=seagreen]
having[vbcol=seagreen]
afford[vbcol=seagreen]
*long*[vbcol=seagreen]
considering[vbcol=seagreen]
speaks of[vbcol=seagreen]
women in[vbcol=seagreen]
and[vbcol=seagreen]
posture[vbcol=seagreen]
can't[vbcol=seagreen]
on[vbcol=seagreen]
your[vbcol=seagreen]
intended[vbcol=seagreen]
personally[vbcol=seagreen]
our[vbcol=seagreen]
your[vbcol=seagreen]
be[vbcol=seagreen]
at[vbcol=seagreen]
you[vbcol=seagreen]
bite[vbcol=seagreen]
me[vbcol=seagreen]
towards[vbcol=seagreen]
<1130486.1113836721510.JavaMail.wwwrun@web27.ims-firmen.de>[vbcol=seagreen]
program. I[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
************************************************************************
>
> My God!!
> Their lawlessness knows no bounds.

For real!

> I don't recall if they have made this type of offer to me or anyone
> else, they may have and I dismissed it as being another one of their
> scams.
> With this post, maybe someone in the legal field can actually do
> something about cyberspace bandits.

SPP stalkers and moneygrubbing BANDITS!

> hoof
>
> --
>
>
>
> { Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
> were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
> {If you have a problem with that,
> take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
>
>
> A Free Thinker.

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

In article <1u85y4qp7d0b$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:27:11 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:
>
>
> You bored again?

No! Just waiting patiently as I was asked to do.

Alan

Professeur Von TwoSteps OA.

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

From : hoofprints <equsphotogophr@hotmail.com>
Message-ID : <426295BC.CB610A3C@hotmail.com>

>
>Damn, I guess I am bored with Iceman posts, cuz I thought he was
>speaking of Maslows Hierarchy of Needs, instead he speaks of how
>difficult it is for him to recognize and praise the women in his life

What do you expect Lynne ? *elder* Iceman is an acknowledge and publicly proven *stoopid*

Such basic things such as the joy a lady has in the purchase of a new dress and matching shoes
is beyond his insensitive working-class comprehension

Clearly his employer, *mutton dressed up as lamb* Kali well deserves him

They both complement each other

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:25:45 -0700, hoofprints wrote:

>
> Does this mean that you are entertaining the idea of dehumanizing me
> more than you and your friends already have??
> I doubt that you can react any lower than you already have towards
> myself and others.
> But go ahead, show the world just how big a jerk you can be.
> hoof

You got all that from my little post?

BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:41:59 -0700, hoofprints wrote:

>
> ************************************************************************
>
> My God!!
> Their lawlessness knows no bounds.
> I don't recall if they have made this type of offer to me or anyone
> else, they may have and I dismissed it as being another one of their
> scams.
> With this post, maybe someone in the legal field can actually do
> something about cyberspace bandits.
> hoof

If its not anon, they could if they were international. Peter would be
exonerated if they did and any fool who tried to use this against PJR would
be in deep doo doo. <snarf>

hoofprints

2005-04-19, 10:43 am

"Professeur Von TwoSteps OA." wrote:
>
> From : hoofprints <equsphotogophr@hotmail.com>
> Message-ID : <426295BC.CB610A3C@hotmail.com>
>
>
>
>
> What do you expect Lynne ? *elder* Iceman is an acknowledge and publicly proven *stoopid*
>
> Such basic things such as the joy a lady has in the purchase of a new dress and matching shoes
> is beyond his insensitive working-class comprehension

He probably holds his wife's hand so she can't skip off and charge his
credit card.

hoof

>
> Clearly his employer, *mutton dressed up as lamb* Kali well deserves him
>
> They both complement each other

--

{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}

A Free Thinker.

A.Melon

2005-04-19, 11:49 am

In article <72mwqwbnwjpv$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:41:59 -0700, hoofprints wrote:
>
>
> If its not anon, they could if they were international. Peter would be
> exonerated if they did and any fool who tried to use this against PJR would
> be in deep doo doo. <snarf>

Yaknow Liceman, for all you know there could be somebody from the legal field
doing that very thing right this very moment, which shows how dumb some of the
legal field can be doesn't it?

So come on Licey Baby, tell us some more about how Mommy holds your hand while
she takes you to the shops with her. *snigger*

Alan

Kali

2005-04-19, 10:58 pm

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:58 pm

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 07:44:41 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <72mwqwbnwjpv$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Yaknow Liceman, for all you know there could be somebody from the legal field
> doing that very thing right this very moment, which shows how dumb some of the
> legal field can be doesn't it?
>
> So come on Licey Baby, tell us some more about how Mommy holds your hand while
> she takes you to the shops with her. *snigger*
>
> Alan

This from a guy who held hands with a Trannie Boi? Couldn't tell the
difference between a "woman" and a real woman? LMAO!

Iceman

2005-04-19, 10:58 pm

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 21:17:39 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <1a2be8tbtjai2$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Excuse me Iceman, but you are a sexist, for some men too have to be constantly
> reassured in order to function too, and once the source of their support ceases
> to support them, then their entire little world comes crashing down about their
> ears, and they will end up living in a hovel, or worse.
>
> Yaknow I just thought I would stop a while to reflect on how *good* life is.
>
> I own my house, mortage nearly paid off, two vehicles on the drive both less
> than two years old, and running my own business and having to take a month off
> to avoid going into the higher tax band, and I can afford my phone bill, and I
> have a woman who loves me, and I her, and *we* laugh *long* and *hard* Iceman.
> Ah life is so damn good Iceman. Yaknow, I was considering using one of my three
> computers to run a remailer in my spare time.
>
> Firebird

You should learn how to use one computer first.

We have garages, no need to park in the driveway. Sorry you didn't make
enough money and had to worry about rolling over into another tax bracket.

Better you make money than staying on the dole, eh? Is this the first year
you paid taxes?

Iceman

2005-04-20, 8:53 am

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:02:46 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <xsy9w8qvpnga$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> Let's get back to you holding *Mommies* hand as she takes you to the shops
> *Mommas* *Boy*
>
> You already *admitted* it *Liceman*
>
> Firebird

I stated that I still hold my wife's hand when we go out. There is no shame
in that. Heck, we even sit together.

There was no "admitting" anything.

Were you ashamed of holding Beverley's hand? Will you admit that or go
through your typical denials?

Iceman

2005-04-20, 8:53 am

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:47:45 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

>
> Lamer! More of your filthy *lies* Liceman.
>
> I know what you are. You are identical to the fool I spoke to on Sunday night.
>

Nice of you to admit that you were the XXXXXXX who stuck your nose into
someone else's biz. Then you whine to Kali about it and "sought" her help.

> A Sociopathic liar, who would diss his own wife to a stranger on the phone
> rather than admit he had done any wrong, and you are the same, and you both
> belong in the hell you are going to.
>
> Firebird

False associations? Yuppers. You can't handle life very well can you. Now
its catching up to you and you try to disassociate yourself from your
mistakes.

Tell me, did you justify your drinking by using pomegranate juice too?
Pretend you're a real man and have some cajone's then suck it up.

Ya, you're laughing long and hard ain't ya.....<snicker>

Deal with it XXXXXXX.

Go ahead, marry Beverley, make a real woman out of her. <splorf>

Kali

2005-04-20, 8:53 am

In article <pb75mpl0ato3.dlg@gl4c13r.org>, posted Wed, 20 Apr
2005 05:45:07 GMT, Iceman 1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org says...

>On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:47:45 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:
>
>
>Nice of you to admit that you were the XXXXXXX who stuck your nose into
>someone else's biz. Then you whine to Kali about it and "sought" her help.

All of them: Nosey Parkers.
[vbcol=seagreen]

What an XXXXXXX.

Kali
--
"But I don't want to go among mad people,"
Alice remarked. "Oh, you can't help that,"
said the Cat, "we're all mad here. I'm mad.
You're mad." -Lewis Carroll

Iceman

2005-04-20, 8:53 am

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 06:21:36 GMT, Kali wrote:

> In article <pb75mpl0ato3.dlg@gl4c13r.org>, posted Wed, 20 Apr
> 2005 05:45:07 GMT, Iceman 1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org says...
>
>
> All of them: Nosey Parkers.
>
>
> What an XXXXXXX.
>
> Kali

Now it idiot is afraid to face the music in his home groups.

His history there is so bad that when he makes a drunken apology no one
believes it any more. D'oh!

Iceman

2005-04-20, 8:53 am

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:18:05 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <pb75mpl0ato3.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> It's been my business since 1999 *Liceman* and hey, Kali is the *Klown* who
> makes like she's the expert on usenet, and if you don't know sarcasm when you
> see it, well how *American* of you, *Liceman*
>

LOL, I know sarcasm when I see it, you don't and have to have it explained
to you. It was no sarcasm, it was total blameshifting on your part.

Deal with it, XXXXXXX.

>
> Hey, *We* always laugh *long* and *hard* *Liceman*
>

You and the bottle? Naw, you were whining big time.

> *Always* have and *always* will.
>
> Firebird

You n Beverley laughing? What a hoot!

ROTFLMAO

Linda

2005-04-20, 8:53 am

A.Melon

2005-04-20, 8:53 am

A.Melon

2005-04-20, 8:53 am

In article <1bwalgytbebjb.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:02:46 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:
>
>
> I stated that I still hold my wife's hand when we go out. There is no shame
> in that. Heck, we even sit together.

She's not *fussy* who she sits with then?

She must have very low *self-esteem* but then isn't that what Linda said the
other day?

Firebird

Professeur Von TwoSteps OA.

2005-04-20, 8:53 am

From : Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org>
Message-ID : <1bwalgytbebjb.dlg@gl4c13r.org>

>Heck, we even sit together.

Clearly, siting next to a woman is a big deal for *elder* Iceman

Heck, does the *stoopid* realize normal people do that all the time ?

Poore *elder* Iceman, he must have been taking a walk on his wild-side hahaha

A.Melon

2005-04-20, 8:53 am

Iceman

2005-04-20, 5:55 pm

Iceman

2005-04-20, 5:55 pm

Iceman

2005-04-20, 5:55 pm

A.Melon

2005-04-20, 5:55 pm

Iceman

2005-04-20, 5:55 pm

hoofprints

2005-04-20, 5:55 pm

Iceman

2005-04-20, 5:55 pm

hoofprints

2005-04-20, 5:55 pm

Iceman

2005-04-20, 10:51 pm

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:03:34 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

>
> Poor *Liceman* gets it wrong again.
>
> This *is* my home group *Liceman* and I told you that months ago, and I don't
> have hepatitis any more, so why do you X-post there, and why should I be there,
> and why should I not have a drink if I want one? Who are you to tell me what I
> can and can not do? God?

You can do whatever you want <shrugs>

Whine all you want

Cry all you want

Do all the trannie's you want <splorf>

It makes no nevermind to me

You're still an XXXXXXX, a sick XXXXXXX.

Iceman

2005-04-20, 10:51 pm

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:48:55 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> Well waddayaknow, we agree again, and I could tell you about something else we
> once agreed on in this matter, but that would be me betraying a friend's
> confidence, and I don't do that.
>
> Firebird

First you ask her for help, then you backtrack, now your trying to be
friends again?

XXXXXXX

Iceman

2005-04-20, 10:51 pm

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:34:00 -0700 (PDT), A.Melon wrote:

> In article <1cq5t2llaavgy$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>
> Iceman <1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org> wrote:
>
> Stab you in the back? I don't even know you.

Of course you don't. But you tried playing nicey, nicey on several
occasions and being that I don't hold grudges or act our of hatred it was
of no nevermind to me, but then you'd take things that you knew better
about and use them in the manner of "alias". Of course everything you knew
was posted on Usenet so anyone could see the truth but still you lied and
distorted.

Put this in the mix with stuff you did to hep friends who emailed you in
private and later on you used your "hardcopies" against them, even twisting
around what they wrote.

You are scum Alias, especially when one considers what Nemesis wrote about
you having AIDS and not telling the woman about it, then your post that it
was all her fault. How low is that?

I can think of nothing lower.

Yes, I verified what nemesis wrote by looking it up myself.
That was a ghastly thing to do.

Iceman

2005-04-21, 8:53 am

Iceman

2005-04-21, 8:53 am

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:13:51 -0500, Kali wrote:

> In article <1fodpo24y4t9d$.dlg@gl4c13r.org>, posted Wed, 20 Apr
> 2005 06:38:41 GMT, Iceman 1c3m4n@gl4c13r.org says...
>
>
> I figured it was probably booze. If he's so happy, why is he
> acting the way he is? I don't get it.
>
> Kali

He usually gets all morose, and throws a self pity party. ASH-C