| hoofprints 2005-12-29, 12:56 pm |
|
greyhackles wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:44:52 -0800, "Waterspider" <waterspider@moonlight.net>
> wrote:
>
>
> That'd be granting it more complexity than deserved.
> It's simply nonsense.
>
> /gh
I suppose the powers that be thought giving NonA/NonB blood to those
needing blood was a bit less complex, and that NonA was the category
which it deserved!! You know the decision to classify NonA/NonB as
oral/anal contracted vs. Serum B. Guess which one HCV falls into?
I should know, that is how I got this crap back on Nov. 2, 1977. 2 lousy
pints to 'make me feel better' after miscarrying at 5 months
gestation!! When i woke up in the recovery room, and saw the IV tube
looking red instead of clear, and 'objected' to the red color, they
knocked me out and gave me another pint!!
An 1981 annual physical picked it up on the labs and it stated
NonA/NonB, and my doctor had no clue what that meant!!
hoof
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
|