|
Home > Archive > Hepatitis disease > December 2005 > Nemesis News Now Has a Death Clock
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Nemesis News Now Has a Death Clock
|
|
|
|
| hoofprints 2005-12-18, 6:04 pm |
|
Alan wrote:
>
> http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
>
> Nemesis News, Working For Nemesis, the Goddess of Divine Retribution, to bring
> you truth at all times, now complete with death clock. 780 people have died
> since I put it there.
>
What does Nemesis think of Life Boat Ethics, not only on a grand scale,
but on a tiny microcosm of land?
How would Hardin view Nemesis?
hoof
> http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
>
> Alan
>
> "Can't you see we're still here,
> Can't you see we're still here,
> Singing loud; Singing clear,
> We shall not go under,
> We're still here."
>
> Nemesis Peace Centre
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
>
> Abuse of Women and Children
>
> http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
>
> Nemesis News
>
> http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
>
> Absolute Anarchy
>
> http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
>
> http://www.john-lennon.com/
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
| hoofprints 2005-12-18, 6:04 pm |
|
hoofprints wrote:
>
> Alan wrote:
>
> What does Nemesis think of Life Boat Ethics, not only on a grand scale,
> but on a tiny microcosm of land?
Since you know nemesis well Alan, would it be fair to state that Nemesis
would look at Life boat Ethics this way:
People made their own choices. If they made good choices, and have a
life boat they should not allow people who have made 'poor' choices on
their life boat?
The end result, is that their 'retribution' for their choices, is to
drown.
Is this the correct assumption on my part Lord Cerne Abbas?
hoof aka Hardin.
> How would Hardin view Nemesis?
>
> hoof
>
> --
>
> { Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
> were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
> {If you have a problem with that,
> take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
>
> A Free Thinker.
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
| hoofprints 2005-12-18, 6:04 pm |
|
hoofprints wrote:
>
> hoofprints wrote:
>
> Since you know nemesis well Alan, would it be fair to state that Nemesis
> would look at Life boat Ethics this way:
> People made their own choices. If they made good choices, and have a
> life boat they should not allow people who have made 'poor' choices on
> their life boat?
> The end result, is that their 'retribution' for their choices, is to
> drown.
> Is this the correct assumption on my part Lord Cerne Abbas?
>
> hoof aka Hardin.
What would nemesis say about socialists/liberals, who failed to throw a
life preserver to a 'blood' relative, and who now find themselves
needing a life boat?
So, they stream out of the woodwork, like so many wood eating termites,
under the 'pretense' that they are 'family' ergo, matriarchal 'step'
children must allow 'their' bloodline onto the life boat because the
patriarchs is married to them!! And they are pretty damn neurotic too!!
So under the laws of retribution, where the patriarchs child wasn't
thrown a life preserver, they don't have the 'right' to be bailed out
and will use 'guilt', 'deception', and 'chaos' to gain what 'they' think
they are entitled too!! Is this correct about Nemisisian Philosophy?
[Hardin doesn't care either way].
hoof
>
>
> --
>
> { Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
> were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
> {If you have a problem with that,
> take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
>
> A Free Thinker.
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
|
| In article <43A5BF1A.38B4F39A@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
(hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Alan wrote:
>
> What does Nemesis think of Life Boat Ethics, not only on a grand scale,
> but on a tiny microcosm of land?
> How would Hardin view Nemesis?
Life boat people are very brave. They go out to rescue people, no matter how
awful the weather, to save people's lives, and over here many of them are
volunteers. They should be given full military status, full military pay, and
full use of military resources if they need it. What's more, the Royal Navy
should be made into a purely coastal defence force with the lifeboats as a
section in its own right. Surely it would be sensible for all countries with a
coastline to do the same? Why should we pay for the Royal Navy to go defending
other countries, while men and women in lifeboats work as volunteers?
Is this Tim Hardin? Nemesis is a very secure Goddess and doesn't need worship;
She knows Her own power and value, so it doesn't matter. She thinks all women
should realise their own value too.
Alan
"Can't you see we're still here,
Can't you see we're still here,
Singing loud; Singing clear,
We shall not go under,
We're still here."
Nemesis Peace Centre
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
Abuse of Women and Children
http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
Nemesis News
http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
Absolute Anarchy
http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
http://www.john-lennon.com/
| |
| hoofprints 2005-12-18, 6:04 pm |
|
hoofprints wrote:
>
> hoofprints wrote:
>
> What would nemesis say about socialists/liberals, who failed to throw a
> life preserver to a 'blood' relative, and who now find themselves
> needing a life boat?
> So, they stream out of the woodwork, like so many wood eating termites,
> under the 'pretense' that they are 'family' ergo, patriarchal 'step'
> children must allow 'their' matriarchal bloodline onto the life boat because the
> patriarchs is married to them!! And they are pretty damn neurotic too!!
> So under the laws of retribution, where the patriarchs child wasn't
> thrown a life preserver, they don't have the 'right' to be bailed out
> and will use 'guilt', 'deception', and 'chaos' to gain what 'they' think
> they are entitled too!! Is this correct about Nemisisian Philosophy?
> [Hardin doesn't care either way].
> hoof
{Corrections: replaced matriarchal steps with patriarchal steps, and
added 'matriarchal' bloodlines}
Shame on those who know 'exactly' why I am asking these questions. You
know who you are!
hoof[vbcol=seagreen]
>
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
| hoofprints 2005-12-18, 6:04 pm |
|
Alan wrote:
>
> In article <43A5BF1A.38B4F39A@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> (hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Life boat people are very brave. They go out to rescue people, no matter how
> awful the weather, to save people's lives, and over here many of them are
> volunteers. They should be given full military status, full military pay, and
> full use of military resources if they need it. What's more, the Royal Navy
> should be made into a purely coastal defence force with the lifeboats as a
> section in its own right. Surely it would be sensible for all countries with a
> coastline to do the same? Why should we pay for the Royal Navy to go defending
> other countries, while men and women in lifeboats work as volunteers?
>
> Is this Tim Hardin? Nemesis is a very secure Goddess and doesn't need worship;
> She knows Her own power and value, so it doesn't matter. She thinks all women
> should realise their own value too.
I forget the philosophers first name, but I remember the philo, and see
the wisdom for Hardin philo being put into practice on a small scale.
hoof
>
>
> Alan
>
> "Can't you see we're still here,
> Can't you see we're still here,
> Singing loud; Singing clear,
> We shall not go under,
> We're still here."
>
> Nemesis Peace Centre
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
>
> Abuse of Women and Children
>
> http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
>
> Nemesis News
>
> http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
>
> Absolute Anarchy
>
> http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
>
> http://www.john-lennon.com/
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
|
| In article <43A5C4D9.3D8B9115@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
(hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> hoofprints wrote:
>
> Since you know nemesis well Alan, would it be fair to state that Nemesis
> would look at Life boat Ethics this way:
> People made their own choices. If they made good choices, and have a
> life boat they should not allow people who have made 'poor' choices on
> their life boat?
> The end result, is that their 'retribution' for their choices, is to
> drown.
> Is this the correct assumption on my part Lord Cerne Abbas?
Yes, but if a ship has been at sea for a week and it just happened to arrive in
say Florida at the same time as Wilma hit, and got driven onto the rocks then it
is hardly the crew's fault. Ships have to carry cargo from one country to
another; always have done and always will. The sea can be very cruel and ships
get damaged, so you have to have a rescue force.
I was working on a ferry to Belgium and when you are down in the engine room you
don't notice the ship rolling because you are below the water-line. A big truck
full of Spanish oranges flipped over on the car deck, and crushed three cars and
oranges went everywhere. You can't hear a thing in the engine room because the
diesels run flat out all the time and you control the ship's speed by altering
the pitch of the screws. That was the Free Enterprise III. One week later, the
Herald of Free Enterprise sank in Zeebruge harbour. I could have been on that
ship and I would have been in the engine room, and I would have drowned because
I can't swim. The best time was going to Calais in a force 12 gale. The ship was
yawing, which is rocking and rolling at the same time in a corkscrew manner. I
stood on deck in the wind and rain and it is the greatest feeling ever. I don't
think a single passenger wasn't throwing up. We had to stand off Calais for two
hours because it was simply too rough to enter the harbour. You have to run a
ferry service to schedule no matter how bad the weather.
Now on the other hand, people in smaller craft who don't bother checking the
weather forecast and tides before going out on a day trip should have to pay for
being rescued; and yes, been there and done that and felt like smacking somebody
in the ear for not checking the fuel lines before taking us fishing. The twat
didn't even have oars so we could row. Needless to say, I didn't go fishing with
him any more. What's more, I didn't like Mackerel that tasted of petrol. We made
him suck the petrol through the fuel lines to get the motor going and it spilt
all over the fish we caught. LOL
Alan
"Can't you see we're still here,
Can't you see we're still here,
Singing loud; Singing clear,
We shall not go under,
We're still here."
Nemesis Peace Centre
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
Abuse of Women and Children
http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
Nemesis News
http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
Absolute Anarchy
http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
http://www.john-lennon.com/
| |
|
| In article <43A5CECC.7790671C@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
(hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> hoofprints wrote:
>
> What would nemesis say about socialists/liberals, who failed to throw a
> life preserver to a 'blood' relative, and who now find themselves
> needing a life boat?
> So, they stream out of the woodwork, like so many wood eating termites,
> under the 'pretense' that they are 'family' ergo, matriarchal 'step'
> children must allow 'their' bloodline onto the life boat because the
> patriarchs is married to them!! And they are pretty damn neurotic too!!
> So under the laws of retribution, where the patriarchs child wasn't
> thrown a life preserver, they don't have the 'right' to be bailed out
> and will use 'guilt', 'deception', and 'chaos' to gain what 'they' think
> they are entitled too!! Is this correct about Nemisisian Philosophy?
> [Hardin doesn't care either way].
> hoof
You need to read up on Nemesis. It is Hubris that she doesn't like.
And "Patriarchs" should be thrown overboard for not putting women and children
first like proper gentlemen. LOL
Alan
"Can't you see we're still here,
Can't you see we're still here,
Singing loud; Singing clear,
We shall not go under,
We're still here."
Nemesis Peace Centre
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
Abuse of Women and Children
http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
Nemesis News
http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
Absolute Anarchy
http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
http://www.john-lennon.com/
| |
|
|
|
|
| hoofprints 2005-12-18, 6:04 pm |
|
Alan wrote:
>
> In article <43A5CECC.7790671C@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> (hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> You need to read up on Nemesis. It is Hubris that she doesn't like.
>
> And "Patriarchs" should be thrown overboard for not putting women and children
> first like proper gentlemen. LOL
The patriarch is being a proper gentleman, in this instance, however,
the children are adults on the matriarchs/patriarchs side. In fact, the
patriarch was nearly bludgeoned by massive venomous verbal attacks of
past recollections which didn't sit well with his then younger blood
offspring. The offspring ws taken aside, and bluntly told that such
behavior could cause the gentleman his life because of his physical
condition last year, but the patriarchs 'new' wife said nothing at the
time. It was up to the person who threw the life preserver to set the AC
straight on that matter.
Another instance that recently was expressed to the blood offspring,
included a very 'bad' scene at the Christmas dinner last year. Again,
the one who threw the life preserver played like a 'libra' and balanced
the scales by mentioning the 'generation' gap, and the patriarch's
generation saw nothing wrong with that behavior, so it was a 'bad'
scene. Matriarchal step was also within their rights to say something,
but not create a BAD scene.
>
> Alan
>
> "Can't you see we're still here,
> Can't you see we're still here,
> Singing loud; Singing clear,
> We shall not go under,
> We're still here."
>
> Nemesis Peace Centre
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
>
> Abuse of Women and Children
>
> http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
>
> Nemesis News
>
> http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
>
> Absolute Anarchy
>
> http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
>
> http://www.john-lennon.com/
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
|
|
| hoofprints 2005-12-18, 6:04 pm |
|
hoofprints wrote:
>
> Alan wrote:
>
> More like this one.
> http://www.uwyo.edu/moffett/courses...0/lecture6.html
Remember I stated that the Life Boat Metaphor is on a small scale.
Conducting your interpersonal relationships using Hardin Philo. harms no
one who owns a life boat.
Life Boat owners are free to help provided, they can maintain their own
life boat and they incur no harm.
hoof
>
>
> --
>
> { Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
> were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
> {If you have a problem with that,
> take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
>
> A Free Thinker.
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
|
| In article <43A5DD23.FBE2F166@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
(hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Alan wrote:
>
> The patriarch is being a proper gentleman, in this instance, however,
> the children are adults on the matriarchs/patriarchs side. In fact, the
> patriarch was nearly bludgeoned by massive venomous verbal attacks of
> past recollections which didn't sit well with his then younger blood
> offspring. The offspring ws taken aside, and bluntly told that such
> behavior could cause the gentleman his life because of his physical
> condition last year, but the patriarchs 'new' wife said nothing at the
> time. It was up to the person who threw the life preserver to set the AC
> straight on that matter.
> Another instance that recently was expressed to the blood offspring,
> included a very 'bad' scene at the Christmas dinner last year. Again,
> the one who threw the life preserver played like a 'libra' and balanced
> the scales by mentioning the 'generation' gap, and the patriarch's
> generation saw nothing wrong with that behavior, so it was a 'bad'
> scene. Matriarchal step was also within their rights to say something,
> but not create a BAD scene.
Hey, you can always resort to "It's my lifeboat and I am the captain, so my word
is law" and throw any mutineers over the side into the sea.
Alan
"Can't you see we're still here,
Can't you see we're still here,
Singing loud; Singing clear,
We shall not go under,
We're still here."
Nemesis Peace Centre
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
Abuse of Women and Children
http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
Nemesis News
http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
Absolute Anarchy
http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
http://www.john-lennon.com/
| |
|
| In article <43A5DFC0.F1449EE4@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
(hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Alan wrote:
>
> More like this one.
> http://www.uwyo.edu/moffett/courses...0/lecture6.html
Hmmm.... I see that you and I do have similar thoughts. There is another factor
he hasn't factored in. Catastrophic Climate Change also known as a E.L.E.
Azure agrees with me, and she can see the spirals, this is what she said just
yesterday:
"There everywhere, but wait its an old Gaelic Symbol, Travel, The Travelers."
And I know that I have to travel soon too. The Solstice is now aproaching very
quickly.
Alan
"Can't you see we're still here,
Can't you see we're still here,
Singing loud; Singing clear,
We shall not go under,
We're still here."
Nemesis Peace Centre
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
Abuse of Women and Children
http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
Nemesis News
http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
Absolute Anarchy
http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
http://www.john-lennon.com/
| |
| hoofprints 2005-12-19, 1:03 am |
|
Alan wrote:
>
> In article <43A5DD23.FBE2F166@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> (hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Hey, you can always resort to "It's my lifeboat and I am the captain, so my word
> is law" and throw any mutineers over the side into the sea.
Already been done, but not in those words.
I do hope that everyone gets what they want for Christmas, and that it
is a 'permanent' arrangement cuz this mixed message crap sucks for
everyone. And playing push/pull isn't in the 'best' interests of
everyone involved.
hoof
>
> Alan
>
> "Can't you see we're still here,
> Can't you see we're still here,
> Singing loud; Singing clear,
> We shall not go under,
> We're still here."
>
> Nemesis Peace Centre
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
>
> Abuse of Women and Children
>
> http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
>
> Nemesis News
>
> http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
>
> Absolute Anarchy
>
> http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
>
> http://www.john-lennon.com/
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
| hoofprints 2005-12-19, 1:03 am |
|
Alan wrote:
>
> In article <43A5DFC0.F1449EE4@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> (hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Hmmm.... I see that you and I do have similar thoughts. There is another factor
> he hasn't factored in. Catastrophic Climate Change also known as a E.L.E.
The weather channel had a good report on a few weeks ago about the
climate change, they concluded that we are in a global warming situation
which will change the worlds seasons as we currently know them.
I am wondering if the interference from NASA or who ever, that
intercepted the meteor last year has interfered with that meteor filled
with ice, not hitting the sun, and albeit it a small meteor in
comparison to the sun, in cooling it off a bit.
Then there are the new reports which claims to have sited a new solar
system and if the interference resulted in that solar system coming
closer within our range of sight.
>
> Azure agrees with me, and she can see the spirals, this is what she said just
> yesterday:
>
> "There everywhere, but wait its an old Gaelic Symbol, Travel, The Travelers."
>
> And I know that I have to travel soon too. The Solstice is now aproaching very
> quickly.
>
> Alan
>
> "Can't you see we're still here,
> Can't you see we're still here,
> Singing loud; Singing clear,
> We shall not go under,
> We're still here."
>
> Nemesis Peace Centre
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
>
> Abuse of Women and Children
>
> http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
>
> Nemesis News
>
> http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
>
> Absolute Anarchy
>
> http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
>
> http://www.john-lennon.com/
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
| hoofprints 2005-12-19, 1:03 am |
|
hoofprints wrote:
>
> Alan wrote:
>
> The weather channel had a good report on a few weeks ago about the
> climate change, they concluded that we are in a global warming situation
> which will change the worlds seasons as we currently know them.
> I am wondering if the interference from NASA or who ever, that
> intercepted the meteor last year has interfered with that meteor filled
> with ice, not hitting the sun, and albeit it a small meteor in
> comparison to the sun, in cooling it off a bit.
> Then there are the new reports which claims to have sited a new solar
> system and if the interference resulted in that solar system coming
> closer within our range of sight.
Please think of those meteors as small ice filled packets being
sacrificed to the sun god, and do not interfere.
hoof
>
>
> --
>
> { Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
> were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
> {If you have a problem with that,
> take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
>
> A Free Thinker.
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
|
| In article <43A5F842.593E3052@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
(hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Alan wrote:
>
> Already been done, but not in those words.
> I do hope that everyone gets what they want for Christmas, and that it
> is a 'permanent' arrangement cuz this mixed message crap sucks for
> everyone. And playing push/pull isn't in the 'best' interests of
> everyone involved.
I am incensed this morning; I am outraged.
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/th...ticle333991.ece
Stelios bans baseball caps
He can go XXXX himself. He can stick his Pizzas right up his backside. I am
never going to use one of his busses or go to his cinemas, and I don't need his
internet cafes. I am going to complain all over the internet. Who the hell is he
to try and tell me that I can't wear my baseball cap? This is the last straw.
Stelois sucks; Blair sucks; and I am going to claim political asylum in
Venezuela where even the President wears a baseball cap.
Lord Cerne Abbas
Humpty Dumpty Bush fell off the Iraq wall.
Humpty Dumpty Bush had a big fall.
All his spin doctors and all the President's men
couldn't put Humpty Dumpty Bush together again.
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/identity.html
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/mylinks.html
http://www.john-lennon.com/
| |
| hoofprints 2005-12-19, 11:01 am |
|
Alan wrote:
>
> In article <43A5F842.593E3052@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> (hoofprints) wrote:
>
> I am incensed this morning; I am outraged.
>
> http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/th...ticle333991.ece
>
> Stelios bans baseball caps
>
> He can go XXXX himself. He can stick his Pizzas right up his backside. I am
> never going to use one of his busses or go to his cinemas, and I don't need his
> internet cafes. I am going to complain all over the internet. Who the hell is he
> to try and tell me that I can't wear my baseball cap? This is the last straw.
> Stelois sucks; Blair sucks; and I am going to claim political asylum in
> Venezuela where even the President wears a baseball cap.
>
> Lord Cerne Abbas
Do they allow you to wear turbans?
Can you still wear other hats?
oh well!!
hoof
>
> Humpty Dumpty Bush fell off the Iraq wall.
> Humpty Dumpty Bush had a big fall.
> All his spin doctors and all the President's men
> couldn't put Humpty Dumpty Bush together again.
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/identity.html
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/mylinks.html
>
> http://www.john-lennon.com/
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
|
|
| hoofprints 2005-12-20, 10:58 am |
|
Alan wrote:
>
> In article <43A6D281.32E7B49E@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> (hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Yes! Damn good question.
Isn't there a Church of something or other, which requires baseball caps
to be worn?
I didn't know your country was so big on religious freedoms.
Turbans are allowed in our courtrooms, but hats are not!!
hoof
>
>
> Full face motor-cycle helmet maybe? I've got the urge to trade in my car for a
> damn great motor-cycle.
>
>
> Actually he only has the cinema in this town and everybody usually goes to the
> new one. I am going to pull his damn pyramid off my MK page.
>
> Alan
>
> "Can't you see we're still here,
> Can't you see we're still here,
> Singing loud; Singing clear,
> We shall not go under,
> We're still here."
>
> Nemesis Peace Centre
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
>
> Abuse of Women and Children
>
> http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
>
> Nemesis News
>
> http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
>
> Absolute Anarchy
>
> http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
>
> http://www.john-lennon.com/
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
|
| In article <43A8262E.EF86ABFC@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
(hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Alan wrote:
>
> Isn't there a Church of something or other, which requires baseball caps
> to be worn?
Good plan. Thanks Hoof. As of this moment, the Church of Nemesis requires that
its only male member has to wear his baseball hat at all times when he is out.
The women can still wear whatever they like, but they mustn't have *blonde*
*roots*
> I didn't know your country was so big on religious freedoms.
> Turbans are allowed in our courtrooms, but hats are not!!
>
> hoof
LOL. Most people seem to belong to the church of the shopping mall. They passed
a law allowing gay couples to get married this very week, and I noticed, for
some reason, a lot of them went to Belfast to get married. Maybe Belfast is the
gay centre of the U.K. or something? If you want a divorce in a hurry then you
can get one in around a month, as long as you both agree. If you want an
abortion they are legal too. Hey, if you want cheap fags or booze, a Polish
truck driver is well worth asking. The local congregational church did get
Sainsburies to ban Jerry Springer the Movie, but the London Bloggers got a
campaign going to ban Narnia instead, but it hardly matters cos you can get both
from Tesco. There is some plan to build a huge Mosque in London. Here there are
two, and a Sikh temple and of course the Buddhist place pictured on my site, and
the tree Cathedral is just over the lake. I know there is a Chinese place too.
Oh don't forget the Mormons and the JWs too. There is Madame Morganna the witch
who lives near my sister-in-law. There is a spiritualist church over that way
too. Oh don't forget the Catholics and the C of E, who share the big new church
at the City Centre, but the two churches in Stony sit about 200 yards apart. We
all used to get drunk on Christmas eve cos there were 15 pubs in Stony, and the
plan was always to have a pint in each pub and end up at the Catholic Church for
midnight mass, but I never could drink that much. Oh and the Seven Day
Adventists too. They'll all probably be at CMK singing Christmas Carols except
for the Mormons and the JWs. They are the ones who come knocking on the door
too. They should be banned from doing that. I used to enjoy using the arguments
from the one against the other to see how long before they caught on. It's fun.
Lord Cerne Abbas
Humpty Dumpty Bush fell off the Iraq wall.
Humpty Dumpty Bush had a big fall.
All his spin doctors and all the President's men
couldn't put Humpty Dumpty Bush together again.
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/identity.html
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/mylinks.html
http://www.john-lennon.com/
| |
| hoofprints 2005-12-21, 11:06 am |
|
Alan wrote:
>
> In article <43A8262E.EF86ABFC@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> (hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Good plan. Thanks Hoof. As of this moment, the Church of Nemesis requires that
> its only male member has to wear his baseball hat at all times when he is out.
> The women can still wear whatever they like, but they mustn't have *blonde*
> *roots*
>
>
> LOL. Most people seem to belong to the church of the shopping mall. They passed
> a law allowing gay couples to get married this very week, and I noticed, for
> some reason, a lot of them went to Belfast to get married. Maybe Belfast is the
> gay centre of the U.K. or something? If you want a divorce in a hurry then you
> can get one in around a month, as long as you both agree. If you want an
> abortion they are legal too. Hey, if you want cheap fags or booze, a Polish
> truck driver is well worth asking. The local congregational church did get
> Sainsburies to ban Jerry Springer the Movie, but the London Bloggers got a
> campaign going to ban Narnia instead, but it hardly matters cos you can get both
> from Tesco. There is some plan to build a huge Mosque in London. Here there are
> two, and a Sikh temple and of course the Buddhist place pictured on my site, and
> the tree Cathedral is just over the lake. I know there is a Chinese place too.
> Oh don't forget the Mormons and the JWs too. There is Madame Morganna the witch
> who lives near my sister-in-law. There is a spiritualist church over that way
> too. Oh don't forget the Catholics and the C of E, who share the big new church
> at the City Centre, but the two churches in Stony sit about 200 yards apart. We
> all used to get drunk on Christmas eve cos there were 15 pubs in Stony, and the
> plan was always to have a pint in each pub and end up at the Catholic Church for
> midnight mass, but I never could drink that much. Oh and the Seven Day
> Adventists too. They'll all probably be at CMK singing Christmas Carols except
> for the Mormons and the JWs. They are the ones who come knocking on the door
> too. They should be banned from doing that. I used to enjoy using the arguments
> from the one against the other to see how long before they caught on. It's fun.
I was thinking about attending Midnight Mass just this AM.
I haven't been in years.
It is all over the news here about Sir Elton John marrying his partner
today.
hoof
>
> Lord Cerne Abbas
>
> Humpty Dumpty Bush fell off the Iraq wall.
> Humpty Dumpty Bush had a big fall.
> All his spin doctors and all the President's men
> couldn't put Humpty Dumpty Bush together again.
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/identity.html
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/mylinks.html
>
> http://www.john-lennon.com/
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
|
| In article <43A977BA.3B1B0B30@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
(hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Alan wrote:
>
> I was thinking about attending Midnight Mass just this AM.
> I haven't been in years.
>
> It is all over the news here about Sir Elton John marrying his partner
> today.
> hoof
LOL. I nearly posted that, but George Mary Carter might be lurking. I wonder if
he is on George Bush's list?
But in all seriousness, it is like the Government suffers from schizophrenia. On
the ones hand they are liberalising things, and on the other attempting to
introduce draconian measures like ID cards, which get blocked by the House of
Lords. And now the Conservative party have suddenly swung to the left with their
new leader, and Blair just seems to be making one XXXX-up after another. And
yesterday they lost a court case so they can't stop a legal enquiry into the
war.
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/le...ticle334548.ece
I keep wondering whether to leave, or wait and see what happens. It's like
watching a comedy program. I'm waiting for Blair to start pulling his hair out.
He lost his temper in Parliament yesterday because they said he has screwed up
his Presidency of the E.U.
The E.U. is a waste of space anyway, but it does mean you can move to somewhere
else with no hassle. Ireland might be good.
Lord Cerne Abbas
Humpty Dumpty Bush fell off the Iraq wall.
Humpty Dumpty Bush had a big fall.
All his spin doctors and all the President's men
couldn't put Humpty Dumpty Bush together again.
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/identity.html
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/mylinks.html
http://www.john-lennon.com/
| |
|
| In article <43A977BA.3B1B0B30@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
(hoofprints) wrote:
> I was thinking about attending Midnight Mass just this AM.
> I haven't been in years.
I simply can't understand why any woman would go to any church or Mosque.
http://www.nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible7.htm
The Biblical view of women
The God of the Bible decrees that woman must submit to the dominance of man.
"The social and legal position of an Israelite wife was inferior to the position
a wife occupied in the great countries round about... all the texts show that
Israelites wanted mainly sons to perpetuate the family line and fortune, and to
preserve the ancestral inheritance... A husband could divorce his wife; women on
the other hand could not ask for divorce... the wife called her husband Ba'al or
master; she also called him adon or lord; she addressed him, in fact, as a slave
addressed his master or subject, his king. The Decalogue includes a man's wife
among his possessions... all her life she remains a minor. The wife does not
inherit from her husband, nor daughters from their father, except when there is
no male heir. A vow made by a girl or married woman needs, to be valid, the
consent of the father or husband and if this consent is withheld, the vow is
null and void. A man had a right to sell his daughter. Women were excluded from
the succession."
-Roland de Vaux, archaeologist and priest
Blue words represent Bible quotes
Burn The Daughter!
"And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore,
she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire." (Leviticus 21:9)
Comment
A priest's daughter, if found to have lost her virginity without marriage, can
receive the death penalty, but in the form of incineration.
How many fundamentalist priests who so easily condemn others would carry out the
burning of their daughters if they found them "whoring"?
(See also Genesis 38:24)
Cut Off Her Hand!
"When men strive together one with another, and the wife of the one draweth near
for to deliver her husband out of the hand of him that smiteth him, and putteth
forth her hand, and taketh him by the secrets: then thou shalt cut off her hand,
thine eye shall not pity her." (Deuteronomy 25:11-12)
Comment
A wife would naturally wish to come to the aid of her husband in any way she
could if he desperately struggled with an opponent, but the Hebrew law
specifically forbade a wife to help her husband in distress if that support
consisted of her grabbing the enemy's genitals in an effort to stifle his
onslaught. The penalty? Amputation of the hand that fondled the genitals!
Only in an overly obsessive male dominated culture could men create such
atrocious laws. As such, the penis ranked sacrosanct in the minds of men (as it
still stands today). If a male lost his penis for any reason, he would lose the
right to enter a congregation of God. (See Deuteronomy 23:1)
Female Births Get Penalty
"Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a woman have conceived seed, and
born a man child: then she shall be unclean seven days; according to the days of
the separation for her infirmity shall she be unclean." (Leviticus 12:2)
"But if she bear a maid child, then she shall be unclean two weeks, as in her
separation: and she shall continue in the blood of her purifying threescore and
six days." (Leviticus 12:5)
Comment
A woman who gives birth to a child must undergo a purification ritual lest her
"uncleanness" contaminate others. This not only entails her isolation, but also
payments to priests for the ritual acts. Thus the male dominators had even made
birth dirty.
Notice here that if a woman bears a female child, her isolation must last twice
as long as that if she gives birth to a male child!
(See also Psalms 51:3-5)
"The Bible and the church have been the greatest stumbling blocks in the way
of woman's emancipation."
--Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Female Inferiority
"But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head
of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God." (I Corinthians 11:3)
"For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man
created for the woman; but the woman for the man." (I Corinthians 11:8-9)
Comment
The Bible's decree of male supremacy has kept woman inferior to men for
centuries. For the religious, it comes as a sad fact that a human must have a
penis to receive any respect or power within the Church.
All woman should realize that such phrases in the Bible has justified for many
Christian men, not only their supremacy but a reason to sexually abuse women.
(See also I Cor. 14:34-36, I Timothy 2:8-15, I Peter 3:1-7, Ephesians 5:22-24,
Col. 3:18-19)
Jesus Will Kill Children
"Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into
great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. And I will kill her
children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which
searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according
to your works." (Revelation 2:22-23)
Comment
If anyone thinks Jesus represents only a peaceful loving soul, then think again.
For an act of adultery, Jesus would kill innocent children for the adultery of
others; hardly fair justice, love, or the concern for human beings.
Some apologists claim that "children" refers to the followers of a cult of
Jezebel and not to children birthed from Jezebel. However, if this proved the
case, the situation would appear even more horrific, for a cult of believers
could number in the dozens, hundreds, thousands, or more. The deaths of these
multitude of cult believers (which would include children within its membership)
would only make the moralistic problem far more atrocious.
"It's interesting to speculate how it developed that in two of the most
anti-feminist institutions, the church and the law court, the men are wearing
the dresses."
--Flo Kennedy
Kill The Witches!
"Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. Whoever lieth with a beast shall surely
be put to death. He that sacrificeth unto any god, save to the LORD only, he
shall be utterly destroyed." (Exodus 22:18-20)
Comment
These verses attest to the power of belief as they led to the slaughter of
thousands of defenseless people throughout Europe and the rest of the world.
Understand that these verses not only authorize the executions but they
explicitly command them.
Verse 18 justified the burning of women in Europe judged as witches. In early
America, the Salem witch trials resulted in the deaths of women and men.
Verse 19 refers to bestiality, a sin considered worthy of death. Christians used
verse 20 to justify religious wars, Crusades and the slaughter of unbelievers
throughout Europe. And the condemnation of heretics still goes on.
Rape My Daughter
"Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out
now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto
this man do not so vile a thing. But the men would not hearken to him: so the
man took his concubine, and brought her forth unto them; and they knew her, and
abused her all the night until the morning: and when the day began to spring,
they let her go." (Judges 19:24-25)
Comment
Judges 19 describe a father who offers his virgin daughter to a drunken mob.
When the father says "unto this man do not so vile a thing," he makes clear that
sexual abuse should never befall a man (meaning him), yet a woman, even his own
flesh and blood, or a concubine belonging to a perfect stranger, can receive
punishment from men to do what they wish. This attitude against women still
persists to this day and we have the Bible, in large part, to thank for this
attitude against women.
Verse 25 describes the hours long gang rape of the poor concubine. The Bible
gives not one hint of passion or concern for the raped girl. Considering that
many people believe that every word in the Bible comes from God, it should not
surprise anyone why people still use these verses to justify such atrocities.
Silence The Woman!
"Let the women learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to
teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was
first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived
was in the transgression." (I Timothy 2:11-14)
Comment
Another case where the Bible makes it quite clear that women live for man and
must submit to them.
"Man enjoys the great advantage of having a god endorse the code he writes;
and since man exercises a sovereign authority over women it is especially
fortunate that this authority has been vested in him by the Supreme Being. For
the Jews, Mohammedans and Christians among others, man is master by divine
right; the fear of God will therefore repress any impulse towards revolt in the
downtrodden female."
--Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex 1949
(See also I Cor. 11:3-12, I Cor. 14:34-36, I Peter 3:1-7, Ephesians 5:22-24,
Col. 3:18-19.)
Stone The Woman!
"If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, and a man find her
in the city, and lie with her;" (Deuteronomy 22:22)
"Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall
stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being
in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour's wife: so thou
shalt put away evil from among you." (Deuteronomy 22:24)
Comment
(Read also Deuteronomy 22:13-21)
The discovery of a bride lying with another man can yield disastrous results.
If the wife's parents can produce tokens of the damsel's virginity and spread
the cloth before the elders of the city, the husband has to pay the bride's
father one hundred silver shekels and he may not send his wife back to her
parents as long as she lives. But if the bride's virginity does not satisfy the
requirements, the husband can get rid of her by letting the men of the city
stone her to death.
From a practical level, these designed laws regulating women's virginity
protected economic transactions between men rather than for the sake of
morality. (See Virgin's Worth below)
"Virgin" Mistranslation
"Therefore the LORD himself shall give you a sign: Behold, a virgin shall
conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel." (Isaiah 7:14)
Comment
Perhaps the most famous mistranslation of the Bible, the word virgin here comes
from a mistranslated Greek word for virgin.
The original Hebrew version uses the word "almah" which means "young woman"
which may or may not refer to a virgin. Of course the context of the original
Hebrew Isaiah does not refer to a virgin at all, as scholars the world over
agree, but only refers to a young woman.
Later, the author of Matthew 1:22-23, quoted from the mistranslated Isaiah
version, and thus the error turned into a world-wide belief.
Today a few of the modern bibles such as the Revised Standard Version, have
corrected this mistranslation and have replaced the word virgin with "young
woman." (Isaiah 7:14, RSV)
Apparently either God makes errors or the Bible does not come from god, but
rather from fallible men.
Virgin's Worth
"If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold
on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her
shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silvers, and she shall be
his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days."
(Deuteronomy 22:28-29)
Comment
The belief some get about the Biblical law leads them to think that it
represented a great advancement in morality. However, if we look at this law in
the social and economic context, it becomes evident that it did not come from
any moral ground, but rather to protect men's property rights of their wives and
daughters.
This law says that since an unmarried girl, a non-virgin, no longer serves as an
economically valuable asset, her father must receive compensation. As for the
legal requirement of the man that caused the economic problem, his marriage in
that society gave him practically unlimited power over their wives. Such forced
marriage can hardly serve as a concern for the poor girl's welfare.
Wives, Submit Yourselves!
"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the
husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and
he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ,
so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything." (Ephesians 5:22-24)
Comment
These words of Paul describe another instance for the calling of the submission
of women to their husbands. Note that the all inclusive "everything" could allow
husbands to submit their wives to anything, including rape, beatings, slavery,
etc.
(See also I Cor. 11:3-12, I Cor. 14:34-36, I Timothy 2:8-15, I Peter 3:1-7, Col.
3:18-19.)
Women Shall Not Speak
"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them
to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is
a shame for women to speak in the church." (I Corinthians 14:34-35)
Comment
If one ever wishes to find an explanation of woman's inferiority to men, one
only has to look in the Bible. Paul makes clear and delineates the importance of
woman recognizing her place, "ad nauseam."
(See also I Cor. 11:3-12, I Timothy 2:8-15, I Peter 3:1-7, Ephesians 5:22-24,
Col. 3:18-19.)
"The bible teaches that women brought sin and death into the world, that she
precipitated the fall of the race, that she was arraigned before the judgment
seat of Heaven, tried, condemned and sentenced. Marriage for her was to be a
condition of bondage, maternity a period suffering and anguish, and in silence
and subjection, she was to play the role of a dependent on man's bounty for all
her material wants, and for all the information she might desire... Here is the
Bible position of woman briefly summed up."
--Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Women's Sorrow
"Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception;
in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy
husband, and he shall rule over thee." (Genesis 3:16)
Comment
Not only does the Woman get blamed for the Fall, but God decides to multiply her
sorrow, plus, she must submit to her husband like a slave.
Religionists have used this verse as justification and "reason" for the pain and
punishment (sin) of childbirth and the sin of mankind. And to this day many
Christians, Jews and Islamics place women lower then men in the ranking of Godly
order. If ever there existed a more cruel justification against women, it could
not have done as much damage as from belief in Genesis 3:16. Because of the
belief in the Fall, countless Christians have branded the entire human race as
depraved.
Before the advent of male dominated religions, cultures around the world
respected women and worshipped goddesses. The Old Testament records the brutal
slaughter of surrounding cultures and slowly throughout the centuries, the
goddess religions faded away in place of the belief-system of a jealous,
scatological, male war god.
"Christianity teaches that the human race is depraved, fallen, and sinful."
--D. James Kennedy (Why I Believe, World Publishing, 1980)
Rip Up Pregnant Women
"Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they
shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their
women with child shall be ripped up." (Hosea 13:16)
Comment
Throughout the Bible, God smites those who do not believe in him or those who do
not follow his commands. Here we have the grotesque description of infants
dashed to pieces and pregnant women ripped up. Whatever rebellious nature an
infant's father or mother may have had, it bears no justice to an innocent child
or to an unborn fetus who could not possibly have rebelled against God, much
less understood him.
Anyone who claims to love such a God, must accept infanticide as one of God's
ugly revenges.
(See also Psalms 137:9)
The Wicked Woman
"Give me any plague, but the plague of the heart: and any wickedness, but the
wickedness of a woman." (Eccles. 25:13)
"Of the woman came the beginning of sin, and through her we all die." (Eccles.
25:22)
"If she go not as thou wouldest have her, cut her off from thy flesh, and give
her a bill of divorce, and let her go." (Eccles. 25: 26)
"The whoredom of a woman may be known in her haughty looks and eyelids. If thy
daughter be shameless, keep her in straitly, lest she abuse herself through
overmuch liberty." (Eccles. 26:9-10)
"A silent and loving woman is a gift of the Lord: and there is nothing so much
worth as a mind well instructed. A shamefaced and faithful woman is a double
grace, and her continent mind cannot be valued." (Eccles. 26:14-15)
"A shameless woman shall be counted as a dog; but she that is shamefaced will
fear the Lord." (Eccles.26:25)
"For from garments cometh a moth, and from women wickedness. Better is the
churlishness of a man than a courteous woman, a woman, I say, which bringeth
shame and reproach." (Eccles. 42:13-14)
Comment
Ecclesiasticus of the Apocrypha does not appear in most Bibles. However, in
Catholic Bibles, the inferiority of woman still appears in the verses of
Ecclesiasticus. These verses give only a sampling from this book that lowers the
status of women.
http://www.nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible7.htm
How can you submit to this sub-human treatment of women? How can you go to any
religion that treats women as 2nd class, Hoof? It is just plain wrong.
Alan
"Can't you see we're still here,
Can't you see we're still here,
Singing loud; Singing clear,
We shall not go under,
We're still here."
Nemesis Peace Centre
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
Abuse of Women and Children
http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
Nemesis News
http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
Absolute Anarchy
http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
http://www.john-lennon.com/
| |
| hoofprints 2005-12-22, 10:59 am |
|
Alan wrote:
>
> In article <43A977BA.3B1B0B30@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
> (hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> I simply can't understand why any woman would go to any church or Mosque.
I am not going to turn going to Midnight Mass into a feminazi platform!!
hoof
>
> http://www.nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible7.htm
>
> The Biblical view of women
>
> The God of the Bible decrees that woman must submit to the dominance of man.
>
> "The social and legal position of an Israelite wife was inferior to the position
> a wife occupied in the great countries round about... all the texts show that
> Israelites wanted mainly sons to perpetuate the family line and fortune, and to
> preserve the ancestral inheritance... A husband could divorce his wife; women on
> the other hand could not ask for divorce... the wife called her husband Ba'al or
> master; she also called him adon or lord; she addressed him, in fact, as a slave
> addressed his master or subject, his king. The Decalogue includes a man's wife
> among his possessions... all her life she remains a minor. The wife does not
> inherit from her husband, nor daughters from their father, except when there is
> no male heir. A vow made by a girl or married woman needs, to be valid, the
> consent of the father or husband and if this consent is withheld, the vow is
> null and void. A man had a right to sell his daughter. Women were excluded from
> the succession."
>
> -Roland de Vaux, archaeologist and priest
>
> Blue words represent Bible quotes
>
> Burn The Daughter!
>
> "And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore,
> she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire." (Leviticus 21:9)
> Comment
>
> A priest's daughter, if found to have lost her virginity without marriage, can
> receive the death penalty, but in the form of incineration.
>
> How many fundamentalist priests who so easily condemn others would carry out the
> burning of their daughters if they found them "whoring"?
>
> (See also Genesis 38:24)
>
> Cut Off Her Hand!
>
> "When men strive together one with another, and the wife of the one draweth near
> for to deliver her husband out of the hand of him that smiteth him, and putteth
> forth her hand, and taketh him by the secrets: then thou shalt cut off her hand,
> thine eye shall not pity her." (Deuteronomy 25:11-12)
> Comment
>
> A wife would naturally wish to come to the aid of her husband in any way she
> could if he desperately struggled with an opponent, but the Hebrew law
> specifically forbade a wife to help her husband in distress if that support
> consisted of her grabbing the enemy's genitals in an effort to stifle his
> onslaught. The penalty? Amputation of the hand that fondled the genitals!
>
> Only in an overly obsessive male dominated culture could men create such
> atrocious laws. As such, the penis ranked sacrosanct in the minds of men (as it
> still stands today). If a male lost his penis for any reason, he would lose the
> right to enter a congregation of God. (See Deuteronomy 23:1)
>
> Female Births Get Penalty
>
> "Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a woman have conceived seed, and
> born a man child: then she shall be unclean seven days; according to the days of
> the separation for her infirmity shall she be unclean." (Leviticus 12:2)
>
> "But if she bear a maid child, then she shall be unclean two weeks, as in her
> separation: and she shall continue in the blood of her purifying threescore and
> six days." (Leviticus 12:5)
> Comment
>
> A woman who gives birth to a child must undergo a purification ritual lest her
> "uncleanness" contaminate others. This not only entails her isolation, but also
> payments to priests for the ritual acts. Thus the male dominators had even made
> birth dirty.
>
> Notice here that if a woman bears a female child, her isolation must last twice
> as long as that if she gives birth to a male child!
>
> (See also Psalms 51:3-5)
>
> "The Bible and the church have been the greatest stumbling blocks in the way
> of woman's emancipation."
>
> --Elizabeth Cady Stanton
>
> Female Inferiority
>
> "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head
> of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God." (I Corinthians 11:3)
>
> "For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man
> created for the woman; but the woman for the man." (I Corinthians 11:8-9)
> Comment
>
> The Bible's decree of male supremacy has kept woman inferior to men for
> centuries. For the religious, it comes as a sad fact that a human must have a
> penis to receive any respect or power within the Church.
>
> All woman should realize that such phrases in the Bible has justified for many
> Christian men, not only their supremacy but a reason to sexually abuse women.
>
> (See also I Cor. 14:34-36, I Timothy 2:8-15, I Peter 3:1-7, Ephesians 5:22-24,
> Col. 3:18-19)
>
> Jesus Will Kill Children
>
> "Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into
> great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. And I will kill her
> children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which
> searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according
> to your works." (Revelation 2:22-23)
> Comment
>
> If anyone thinks Jesus represents only a peaceful loving soul, then think again.
> For an act of adultery, Jesus would kill innocent children for the adultery of
> others; hardly fair justice, love, or the concern for human beings.
>
> Some apologists claim that "children" refers to the followers of a cult of
> Jezebel and not to children birthed from Jezebel. However, if this proved the
> case, the situation would appear even more horrific, for a cult of believers
> could number in the dozens, hundreds, thousands, or more. The deaths of these
> multitude of cult believers (which would include children within its membership)
> would only make the moralistic problem far more atrocious.
>
> "It's interesting to speculate how it developed that in two of the most
> anti-feminist institutions, the church and the law court, the men are wearing
> the dresses."
>
> --Flo Kennedy
>
> Kill The Witches!
>
> "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. Whoever lieth with a beast shall surely
> be put to death. He that sacrificeth unto any god, save to the LORD only, he
> shall be utterly destroyed." (Exodus 22:18-20)
> Comment
>
> These verses attest to the power of belief as they led to the slaughter of
> thousands of defenseless people throughout Europe and the rest of the world.
>
> Understand that these verses not only authorize the executions but they
> explicitly command them.
>
> Verse 18 justified the burning of women in Europe judged as witches. In early
> America, the Salem witch trials resulted in the deaths of women and men.
>
> Verse 19 refers to bestiality, a sin considered worthy of death. Christians used
> verse 20 to justify religious wars, Crusades and the slaughter of unbelievers
> throughout Europe. And the condemnation of heretics still goes on.
>
> Rape My Daughter
>
> "Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out
> now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto
> this man do not so vile a thing. But the men would not hearken to him: so the
> man took his concubine, and brought her forth unto them; and they knew her, and
> abused her all the night until the morning: and when the day began to spring,
> they let her go." (Judges 19:24-25)
> Comment
>
> Judges 19 describe a father who offers his virgin daughter to a drunken mob.
> When the father says "unto this man do not so vile a thing," he makes clear that
> sexual abuse should never befall a man (meaning him), yet a woman, even his own
> flesh and blood, or a concubine belonging to a perfect stranger, can receive
> punishment from men to do what they wish. This attitude against women still
> persists to this day and we have the Bible, in large part, to thank for this
> attitude against women.
>
> Verse 25 describes the hours long gang rape of the poor concubine. The Bible
> gives not one hint of passion or concern for the raped girl. Considering that
> many people believe that every word in the Bible comes from God, it should not
> surprise anyone why people still use these verses to justify such atrocities.
>
> Silence The Woman!
>
> "Let the women learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to
> teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was
> first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived
> was in the transgression." (I Timothy 2:11-14)
> Comment
>
> Another case where the Bible makes it quite clear that women live for man and
> must submit to them.
>
> "Man enjoys the great advantage of having a god endorse the code he writes;
> and since man exercises a sovereign authority over women it is especially
> fortunate that this authority has been vested in him by the Supreme Being. For
> the Jews, Mohammedans and Christians among others, man is master by divine
> right; the fear of God will therefore repress any impulse towards revolt in the
> downtrodden female."
>
> --Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex 1949
>
> (See also I Cor. 11:3-12, I Cor. 14:34-36, I Peter 3:1-7, Ephesians 5:22-24,
> Col. 3:18-19.)
>
> Stone The Woman!
>
> "If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, and a man find her
> in the city, and lie with her;" (Deuteronomy 22:22)
>
> "Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall
> stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being
> in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour's wife: so thou
> shalt put away evil from among you." (Deuteronomy 22:24)
> Comment
>
> (Read also Deuteronomy 22:13-21)
>
> The discovery of a bride lying with another man can yield disastrous results.
>
> If the wife's parents can produce tokens of the damsel's virginity and spread
> the cloth before the elders of the city, the husband has to pay the bride's
> father one hundred silver shekels and he may not send his wife back to her
> parents as long as she lives. But if the bride's virginity does not satisfy the
> requirements, the husband can get rid of her by letting the men of the city
> stone her to death.
>
> From a practical level, these designed laws regulating women's virginity
> protected economic transactions between men rather than for the sake of
> morality. (See Virgin's Worth below)
>
> "Virgin" Mistranslation
>
> "Therefore the LORD himself shall give you a sign: Behold, a virgin shall
> conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel." (Isaiah 7:14)
> Comment
>
> Perhaps the most famous mistranslation of the Bible, the word virgin here comes
> from a mistranslated Greek word for virgin.
>
> The original Hebrew version uses the word "almah" which means "young woman"
> which may or may not refer to a virgin. Of course the context of the original
> Hebrew Isaiah does not refer to a virgin at all, as scholars the world over
> agree, but only refers to a young woman.
>
> Later, the author of Matthew 1:22-23, quoted from the mistranslated Isaiah
> version, and thus the error turned into a world-wide belief.
>
> Today a few of the modern bibles such as the Revised Standard Version, have
> corrected this mistranslation and have replaced the word virgin with "young
> woman." (Isaiah 7:14, RSV)
>
> Apparently either God makes errors or the Bible does not come from god, but
> rather from fallible men.
>
> Virgin's Worth
>
> "If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold
> on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her
> shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silvers, and she shall be
> his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days."
> (Deuteronomy 22:28-29)
> Comment
>
> The belief some get about the Biblical law leads them to think that it
> represented a great advancement in morality. However, if we look at this law in
> the social and economic context, it becomes evident that it did not come from
> any moral ground, but rather to protect men's property rights of their wives and
> daughters.
>
> This law says that since an unmarried girl, a non-virgin, no longer serves as an
> economically valuable asset, her father must receive compensation. As for the
> legal requirement of the man that caused the economic problem, his marriage in
> that society gave him practically unlimited power over their wives. Such forced
> marriage can hardly serve as a concern for the poor girl's welfare.
>
> Wives, Submit Yourselves!
>
> "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the
> husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and
> he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ,
> so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything." (Ephesians 5:22-24)
> Comment
>
> These words of Paul describe another instance for the calling of the submission
> of women to their husbands. Note that the all inclusive "everything" could allow
> husbands to submit their wives to anything, including rape, beatings, slavery,
> etc.
>
> (See also I Cor. 11:3-12, I Cor. 14:34-36, I Timothy 2:8-15, I Peter 3:1-7, Col.
> 3:18-19.)
>
> Women Shall Not Speak
>
> "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them
> to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
> And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is
> a shame for women to speak in the church." (I Corinthians 14:34-35)
> Comment
>
> If one ever wishes to find an explanation of woman's inferiority to men, one
> only has to look in the Bible. Paul makes clear and delineates the importance of
> woman recognizing her place, "ad nauseam."
>
> (See also I Cor. 11:3-12, I Timothy 2:8-15, I Peter 3:1-7, Ephesians 5:22-24,
> Col. 3:18-19.)
>
> "The bible teaches that women brought sin and death into the world, that she
> precipitated the fall of the race, that she was arraigned before the judgment
> seat of Heaven, tried, condemned and sentenced. Marriage for her was to be a
> condition of bondage, maternity a period suffering and anguish, and in silence
> and subjection, she was to play the role of a dependent on man's bounty for all
> her material wants, and for all the information she might desire... Here is the
> Bible position of woman briefly summed up."
>
> --Elizabeth Cady Stanton
>
> Women's Sorrow
>
> "Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception;
> in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy
> husband, and he shall rule over thee." (Genesis 3:16)
> Comment
>
> Not only does the Woman get blamed for the Fall, but God decides to multiply her
> sorrow, plus, she must submit to her husband like a slave.
>
> Religionists have used this verse as justification and "reason" for the pain and
> punishment (sin) of childbirth and the sin of mankind. And to this day many
> Christians, Jews and Islamics place women lower then men in the ranking of Godly
> order. If ever there existed a more cruel justification against women, it could
> not have done as much damage as from belief in Genesis 3:16. Because of the
> belief in the Fall, countless Christians have branded the entire human race as
> depraved.
>
> Before the advent of male dominated religions, cultures around the world
> respected women and worshipped goddesses. The Old Testament records the brutal
> slaughter of surrounding cultures and slowly throughout the centuries, the
> goddess religions faded away in place of the belief-system of a jealous,
> scatological, male war god.
>
> "Christianity teaches that the human race is depraved, fallen, and sinful."
> --D. James Kennedy (Why I Believe, World Publishing, 1980)
>
> Rip Up Pregnant Women
>
> "Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they
> shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their
> women with child shall be ripped up." (Hosea 13:16)
> Comment
>
> Throughout the Bible, God smites those who do not believe in him or those who do
> not follow his commands. Here we have the grotesque description of infants
> dashed to pieces and pregnant women ripped up. Whatever rebellious nature an
> infant's father or mother may have had, it bears no justice to an innocent child
> or to an unborn fetus who could not possibly have rebelled against God, much
> less understood him.
>
> Anyone who claims to love such a God, must accept infanticide as one of God's
> ugly revenges.
>
> (See also Psalms 137:9)
>
> The Wicked Woman
>
> "Give me any plague, but the plague of the heart: and any wickedness, but the
> wickedness of a woman." (Eccles. 25:13)
>
> "Of the woman came the beginning of sin, and through her we all die." (Eccles.
> 25:22)
>
> "If she go not as thou wouldest have her, cut her off from thy flesh, and give
> her a bill of divorce, and let her go." (Eccles. 25: 26)
>
> "The whoredom of a woman may be known in her haughty looks and eyelids. If thy
> daughter be shameless, keep her in straitly, lest she abuse herself through
> overmuch liberty." (Eccles. 26:9-10)
>
> "A silent and loving woman is a gift of the Lord: and there is nothing so much
> worth as a mind well instructed. A shamefaced and faithful woman is a double
> grace, and her continent mind cannot be valued." (Eccles. 26:14-15)
>
> "A shameless woman shall be counted as a dog; but she that is shamefaced will
> fear the Lord." (Eccles.26:25)
>
> "For from garments cometh a moth, and from women wickedness. Better is the
> churlishness of a man than a courteous woman, a woman, I say, which bringeth
> shame and reproach." (Eccles. 42:13-14)
> Comment
>
> Ecclesiasticus of the Apocrypha does not appear in most Bibles. However, in
> Catholic Bibles, the inferiority of woman still appears in the verses of
> Ecclesiasticus. These verses give only a sampling from this book that lowers the
> status of women.
>
> http://www.nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible7.htm
>
> How can you submit to this sub-human treatment of women? How can you go to any
> religion that treats women as 2nd class, Hoof? It is just plain wrong.
>
> Alan
>
> "Can't you see we're still here,
> Can't you see we're still here,
> Singing loud; Singing clear,
> We shall not go under,
> We're still here."
>
> Nemesis Peace Centre
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html
>
> Abuse of Women and Children
>
> http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/
>
> Nemesis News
>
> http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/
>
> Absolute Anarchy
>
> http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/
>
> http://www.john-lennon.com/
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
| |
|
| In article <43AABFB4.140D73DD@hotmail.com>, equsphotogophr@hotmail.com
(hoofprints) wrote:
>
>
> Alan wrote:
>
> I am not going to turn going to Midnight Mass into a feminazi platform!!
> hoof
I found an amazing new project, but I can't help feeling that I am being
plagiarised.
http://www.rightard.org/
Rightard Impregnation and Infiltration Project (RIIP)
The horror of Republicanism is a problem that has no quick fixes. It's a problem
that will require decades -- generations, even -- to solve since the core of
what constitutes Republicanism can't be eliminated solely with medication or a
program of electroshock treatments.
The problem of Republicanism is at its base the low quality of education in
America coupled with a national low average of intelligence, itself a problem
that is getting worse as Republicans continue to breed ever more Republicans.
The consequences in just the past decade have been the nullification of the U.
S. Constitution, the destruction of Democracy in America and abroad, and the
dismemberment of the rights, freedoms, and liberties of American citizens.
The long term solution is simple: The national average IQ must be raised with
particular attention being addressed to the Republicans among us.
We here at RIIP propose to strike at the root of Republicanism by building a
national alliance of losely-relected chapters of Americans dedicated toward the
impregnation and infiltration of Republican families across the country,
genetically sowing normal and above-normal children among the families of
Republicans whose collective IQs drag down the national average by half of what
the average indicates when Republicans are not counted.
The national project consists of five basic steps
* Locate and seduce the fertile daughter of a Republican.
* XXXX long, XXXX hard, and XXXX often until fertility has been confirmed.
* Stick around for approximately four months or so until conception is
assured.
* Move to another town or city at least 400 miles away.
* Repeat the process from the start.
This is a safe, fun, and effective means of destroying Republicanism and putting
an end to the mass slaughters and fascism that is the hallmark of Republicanism.
Results should be seen in approximately five or six years when bright and
intelligent children within Republican families all across the country start to
inform their grandparents that they're clueless XXXXing assholes.
National chapters are forming up and if you would like to create a chapter in
your area, send us contact information and we will add you to the RIIP roles --
and to the web site so that others in your area may join your chapter.
---
* Jenna Bush, Ready, Willing, and Able to be Impregnated
http://www.elmerfudd.us/rightard/slut1.htm
---
Lord Cerne Abbas
Humpty Dumpty Bush fell off the Iraq wall.
Humpty Dumpty Bush had a big fall.
All his spin doctors and all the President's men
couldn't put Humpty Dumpty Bush together again.
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/identity.html
http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/mylinks.html
http://www.john-lennon.com/
|
| |
|
|