Home > Archive > Hepatitis disease > December 2005 > Re: Re:the faulking truth





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Re:the faulking truth
Alan

2005-12-14, 5:59 pm

In article <11q14icp7keft7e@corp.supernews.com>, waterspider@moonlight.net
(Waterspider) wrote:

>
> "Alan" <alan@veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk> wrote ...
>
>
> Speaking of the lie of formal education, ever read Ishmael by Daniel Quinn?
> I think you'd enjoy it.
>
> Spidey


http://www.2think.org/ishmael.shtml

One of the fascinating topics dealing with the various aspects of the human
condition is dogma. The need that so many people seem to have not only now but
also in the past to force (in varying degrees) their views of what they think is
"right" onto others. Quinn shows through the fictional metaphors used in the
book, other examples, and his own lack of giving definite conclusions that
diversity and freethought can provide better results than rigid, homogenous
populations and views. For instance, on page 170 he states, "It's going to be
hard as hell for them to give it up, because what they're doing is right (in
their own mind), and they have to go on doing it even if it means destroying the
world and mankind with it."

A major theme of the book deals with thinking before acting. His take on our
actions is that we should not only consider the short and long-term (meaning
during one's lifetime) impacts, but we should also consider the eternal
consequences of our actions. If I choose to do something that gives me X amount
of benefit in the short run and XX amount of benefit in the long run, should I
still go ahead with the action if it also includes XXX+ amount of detriment
after I'm dead?

LMAO. I can't help thinking somebody should have read that before they lost
their temper with me.

"Giving it up would mean . . . It would mean that all along they'd been wrong.
It would mean that they'd never known how to rule the world. It would mean . . .
relinquishing their pretensions to godhood."

So true Spidey. I think I have to get a copy of this book. Thanks Spidey.



Alan

"Can't you see we're still here,
Can't you see we're still here,
Singing loud; Singing clear,
We shall not go under,
We're still here."

Nemesis Peace Centre

http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.../protector.html

Abuse of Women and Children

http://theoriginalfirebird.blogspot.com/

Nemesis News

http://lordcerneabbas.blogspot.com/

Absolute Anarchy

http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/

http://www.john-lennon.com/

Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com