|
Home > Archive > Nursing > December 2005 > Rich Shewmaker Defends Orac
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Rich Shewmaker Defends Orac
|
|
|
|
"Rich" <joshew@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:7UKsf.8348$ka.6990@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>
> "mike" <xyz@xyz.com> wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.12.29.05.20.56.537612@xyz.com...
>
> For sure? Orac is, indeed, a surgical oncologist, and is a real human
> being. The medical and surgical knowledge he has demonstrated in this
> newsgroup and in his blog would be near impossible to fake. You cannot
> produce even a scrap of evidence that Orac is anything other than who he
> says he is,
http://oracknowsHOW TO LIE
http://tinyurl.com/debef
http://tinyurl.com/7wnne
[snip usual insults]
*I don't give a damn if Peter lies to you, this newsgroup, his mother or the
pope*. Rich Shewmaker
> --
>
>
> --Rich
| |
|
|
|
|
"Rich" <joshew@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:BOLsf.8285$hI1.4891@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>
> "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:E3Lsf.664014$_o.617264@attbi_s71...
Dishonest snipping restored:
http://oracknowsHOW TO LIE
http://tinyurl.com/debef
http://tinyurl.com/7wnne
[snip usual insults]
*I don't give a damn if Peter lies to you, this newsgroup, his mother or the
pope*. Rich Shewmaker
[snip diversion + proven lying websites][vbcol=seagreen]
> --
>
>
> --Rich
| |
|
|
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:yMUsf.657842$x96.396332@attbi_s72...
>
> "Rich" <joshew@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:BOLsf.8285$hI1.4891@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>
> Dishonest snipping restored:
There is nothing dishonest about snipping your crap which has nothing to do
with Orac being precisely who he says he is. What you snipped, this:
and
your accusations that he is a hoax make you look almost as silly as PeterB
with his "pharmablogger" fantasies, or Jan and her persistent illusion that
CathyB is "Rosalind."
DOES pertain, and thus it is YOUR snipping of the truth that makes you
undomfortable that is dishonest. What I snipped is lyour inks to Google
archives of your demands for Orac to answer some silly questions of yours.
We've seen that shit before, and we don't need any more of it.
--
--Rich
Recommended websites:
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/
| |
|
|
"JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:yMUsf.657842$x96.396332@attbi_s72...
>
> "Rich" <joshew@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:BOLsf.8285$hI1.4891@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>
> Dishonest snipping restored:
>
> http://oracknowsHOW TO LIE
>
> http://tinyurl.com/debef
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/7wnne
>
>
> [snip usual insults]
>
>
> *I don't give a damn if Peter lies to you, this newsgroup, his mother or
> the
> pope*. Rich Shewmaker
>
> [snip diversion + proven lying websites, for the second time]
>
>
|
| |
|
|