|
Home > Archive > Drugs psychedelic > June 2006 > 2ci or 2ct2?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| APatheticFool@gmail.com 2006-06-15, 2:27 am |
| Tommorow I am making an order for either 500 mg of 2ci (85.00 CAD) or
500 mg of 2ct2 (90.00 CAD). I haven't experimented with any research
chemicals before this. I'm looking to get the most bang for my buck.
So I ask you, RDP. Which do YOU think I should get?
| |
| Load \*\,8,1 2006-06-15, 9:25 pm |
| Check out www.Erowid.com to find out more information on 2ci and 2ct2
--
"Life is easy with eyes closed"
__________________
<APatheticFool@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150352734.754822.299440@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> Tommorow I am making an order for either 500 mg of 2ci (85.00 CAD) or
> 500 mg of 2ct2 (90.00 CAD). I haven't experimented with any research
> chemicals before this. I'm looking to get the most bang for my buck.
>
> So I ask you, RDP. Which do YOU think I should get?
>
| |
|
|
"Load "*",8,1" <eweissbard@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:D6mkg.27235$0v4.13284@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> Check out www.Erowid.com to find out more information on 2ci and 2ct2
>
> --
> "Life is easy with eyes closed"
> __________________
>
>
> <APatheticFool@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1150352734.754822.299440@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
>
thats::: "living is easy with eyes closed"... Strawberry fields By: John
Lennon
| |
| butane317@gmail.com 2006-06-25, 9:25 pm |
| 2C-I in my experience is a cheap trip, really only good for
recreational tripping. I'm getting some 2C-T-2 soon, and am really
looking forward to a full-blown, valuable trip. 2C-I is worth a try;
some of my friends absolutely love it, but personally, I'd rather do
something deep and meaningful.
APatheticFool@gmail.com wrote:
> Tommorow I am making an order for either 500 mg of 2ci (85.00 CAD) or
> 500 mg of 2ct2 (90.00 CAD). I haven't experimented with any research
> chemicals before this. I'm looking to get the most bang for my buck.
>
> So I ask you, RDP. Which do YOU think I should get?
|
| |
|
|