Home > Archive > Psoriasis support > September 2005 > Re: Message to Hyak - a compromise solution





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Message to Hyak - a compromise solution
randall

2005-09-24, 1:40 pm


S. wrote:
> "Cruiser" <nospam.tg.cruisers@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:MGETe.12361$vN.537771@news20.bellglobal.com...

Not that many bold or stupid enough to actually use the CURE word.
But yes a fare amount of those others like me for instance.

[vbcol=seagreen]

But isn't that natural?


http://www.gen.umn.edu/courses/1135...ab/kneejerk.jpg

How natural are Uwe's suPPlements? lol

[vbcol=seagreen]

I won't bring up that old thread and many are better off dead.

But you said it yourself. What works for your 2%, simply may be off
the radar for those in the midst of a full blown flare.

[vbcol=seagreen]

Did they try it external or internal?

Kidding. Lets let it sleep for now as well.

[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
> That banging sound is of a nail being hit firmly and squarely on the head by
> this superb and worthwhile posting.
>


Funny you should use this metaphor as nail P is almost all that
cruiser has. Last time I checked anyway.

I would love to use him for one of my test beds. ;-/


My latest IP6/Vitamin C/antiseptic sprays (two of them and may add in
GJE),
would be the choice.


> I was flamed for posting a web site that was "general advice for
> newbies"......by an M.D. !!!!!


Hey! Get over it already. You'd think we had thin skin around here. lol

As to Uwe and his cure deal. I doubt it.

If what he's using for CFS is the same for P, i don't see
any great potential for the majority of us.

And i would not use the cure word as long as one stays on it, unless
it's only food (suPPlements) as he's stated. OTOh he's saying that
we lack a nutrient/s for an I.M.I.D. and thats a stretch.

Back to his CFS *cure*,



http://groups.google.com/groups?q=c...twV-SdE-sqz181Q

I read only the first (first two in this post), second and fifth posts
in this search.

If he really has something let him go the route that Barry H
recommended.
He'll be rich off of us. Fine with me.


I may as well take the time to let Uwe know that I intended for there
to be
a ? mark after that sentence he quoted twice.

If I had the time i may have done a better author search.

But if he's not letting the cat outa the bag, then it's only
sPeculation.

Not that we don't do that 99.99% of the time in this group.


Oh and btw, welcome back to Ben who posted recently as well. He's got
me
going on his latest trial on toP of mine.

So much fun going on that i don't know what to think.


randall

Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com