Home > Archive > Herpes support > June 2006 > Re: Is it true that there is not always an initial reaction once someone is exposed to





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Is it true that there is not always an initial reaction once someone is exposed to
bghilliotti@hotmail.com

2006-06-04, 9:14 am

I just want to add...

So it is possible for people to get it without a "primary outbreak" as
you call it, or an initial outbreak, as I call it.

What percentage of herpes cases are there (estimated) that do not have
a "primary outbreak"?

In this case, is it common for people to get the virus, not know they
have it because of no "primary outbreak", and spread it to other people
in their ignorance? And how many of these people also do not get a
primary outbreak and spread in a similiar fashion?

Tricky little bug. Perhaps it is "evolving". It seems to be aware of
the fact that if the host is aware of its prescence, it will take steps
to prevent it's spread. It needs to continuously spread from host to
host to surrvive in the long run.

Copyright 2003 - 2008 pahealthsystems.com