| Michael Baldwin, Bruce 2006-03-27, 10:26 am |
| Dickless Davie tholoon@antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined:
> Michael Baldwin, Bruce writes:
Why do you sneck the next line, Dickless?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Non sequitur.
Note: still no response.
>
>
>
> Glad you agree, Bruce.
Yes, Dickless, the projection was a "lassic" on your part.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
On your part, Dickless. Also "lassic" evasion of my questions. No
surprise there, really.
>
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, Dickless. No surprise there, really.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
Note: still no response.
>
>
> On your part, Bruce.
On your part, Dickless.
>
>
> I'm well aware that your failure to answer my questions constitutes
> evasion, Bruce. No need to tell me about it.
No need to remind me of the stunts you pull to evade my questions,
Dickless, I'm well aware of your evasive tactics.
>
>
> You should know, Bruce, considering how you use the name in your
> attribution. Suffering from schizophrenia now, Bruce?
"clasic" stupidity on your part, Dickless. If you had better reading
comprehension skills, you would have noticed the comma by now. No
surpise there, really.
>
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems?
"lassic" evasion, Dickless. No surprise there, really, as I am well
versed in your evasive tactics, Dickless.
>
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of an erroneous presupposition laced
> with invective.
"Clasic" gibberish as to be expected from someone who continually
evades my questions, Dickless. No surprise there, really.
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce?
What does that have to do with classical music, Dickless?
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming
> from someone who continues to evade the questions put to him.
I'm well aware that your failure to answer the questions represents
classic evasion, Dickless. No need to tell me about it.
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, Dickless.
>
>
> You should know, Bruce, considering how you use the name in your
> attribution. Suffering from schizophrenia now, Bruce?
"Clasic" evasive tactic, Dickless. So are you suffering from
schizophrenia now, Dickless?
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, Dickless. You are yet to answer any of my questions. no
surprise there, really.
>
> What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe,
> Bruce?
"lassic" evasion, Dickless.
>
>
>
>
> Also non sequitur.
Also on your part, Dickless.
>
>
>
>
>
> You should know, Bruce, considering how you use the name in your
> attribution. Suffering from schizophrenia now, Bruce?
"Clasic" evasion, Dickless, and another diversionary tactic employed by
you to evade answering my question. No surprise ther, really.
>
> What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe,
> Bruce?
>
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still hallucinating about such an entity
> being involved in this discussion?
Evasive response noted. Just as I predicted.
>
> I see that you didn't answer the question, Bruce. No surprise
> there really. Having trouble keeping track of the original
> newsgroup and the subject line, Bruce?
"lassic" evasion, Dickless. No surprise there, really.
>
>
>
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems?
"Clasic" evasion, Dickless. Not that I expect a logical response from
you as I know you'll employ you usual evasive tactic of asking who is
Dickless rather than answering the question. No surprise there, really,
Dickless.
>
>
> Non sequitur.
Shazam!
> Who is "Dickless", Bruce? Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, coming from
> someone with ongoing attribution problems.
I see that you didn't answer the question, Dickless. No surprise
there, really. Having trouble keeping track of my original question,
Dickless?
|