|
Home > Archive > Tourette support > November 2004 > Shallow hypocrits
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
|
| I was reading through the archives and ran across ASt posters vengeful
campaign to exact retribution against Dr. Laura for suggesting it be ok to
exclude a child with tourettes from a wedding.
How shallow and hypocritical it is for AST posters to engage in aggressive
activiities to purge and cleanse TS'ers from AST, a support group chartered
specifically for TS'ers, while the the purgers engage in vengefilled
campaigned to exact retribution against Dr. Laura for saying it be ok to
exclude from a wedding.
I truly don't understand why TS'ers believe society is under an obligation
to include TS'ers in their weddings, when these very same posters are
engaging in aggressive activities to purge and cleanse and exclude TS'ers
from their own support groups chartered for them.
This message brought to you in mourning over the recent existential dead
bodies of Nonitpic, Sara and JMM whom were run off of AST by lies and
slander, threats and a neverending stream of insults, and being treated
like pieces of shit, by persons who chose to gather on this support group
to demean, degrade, denigrate, mock, insult and ridicule the people whom
the group was chartered to support.
| |
| bluemoon 2004-10-29, 11:08 am |
| Adinl wrote:
> I was reading through the archives and ran across ASt posters vengeful
> campaign to exact retribution against Dr. Laura for suggesting it be ok to
> exclude a child with tourettes from a wedding.
>
> How shallow and hypocritical it is for AST posters to engage in aggressive
> activiities to purge and cleanse TS'ers from AST, a support group chartered
> specifically for TS'ers, while the the purgers engage in vengefilled
> campaigned to exact retribution against Dr. Laura for saying it be ok to
> exclude from a wedding.
>
> I truly don't understand why TS'ers believe society is under an obligation
> to include TS'ers in their weddings, when these very same posters are
> engaging in aggressive activities to purge and cleanse and exclude TS'ers
> from their own support groups chartered for them.
>
>
> This message brought to you in mourning over the recent existential dead
> bodies of Nonitpic, Sara and JMM whom were run off of AST by lies and
> slander, threats and a neverending stream of insults, and being treated
> like pieces of shit, by persons who chose to gather on this support group
> to demean, degrade, denigrate, mock, insult and ridicule the people whom
> the group was chartered to support.
>
>
>
My God, you're full of shit.
| |
| Randall Bart 2004-10-29, 10:07 pm |
| 'Twas Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:21:51 GMT when all alt.support.tourette stood in
awe as bluemoon <bluemoon@milkyway.net> uttered:
>My God, you're full of shit.
Well you're right, and I wish you wouldn't act so smug about it. Lnida
has lost her marbles again, and it seems to happen when the pooper
troopers from s.p.p descend on a.s.t to attack her. I am not sure why you
do this.
--
RB |\ © Randall Bart
aa |/ admin@RandallBart.spam.com Barticus@att.spam.net
nr |\ Please reply without spam I LOVE YOU 1-917-715-0831
dt ||\ Just a mouse and a maze: http://mouse.brainthru.com
a |/ Siberian Kittens: http://kittens.brainthru.com
l |\ DOT-HS-808-065 The Church Of The Unauthorized Truth:
l |/ MS^7=6/28/107 http://yg.cotut.com mailto:s@cotut.com
| |
|
| "Randall Bart" <Barticus@att.spam.net> wrote in message
news:svs5o0pcbsa1pbsd71f0qda240otaf9lra@4ax.com...
> 'Twas Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:21:51 GMT when all alt.support.tourette stood in
> awe as bluemoon <bluemoon@milkyway.net> uttered:
>
>
> Well you're right, and I wish you wouldn't act so smug about it. Lnida
> has lost her marbles again, and it seems to happen when the pooper
> troopers from s.p.p descend on a.s.t to attack her. I am not sure why you
> do this.
Bluemoon is not a pooper trooper from s.p.p. She comes from elsewhere on
the alt.support hierarchy.
I don't read her words as smugness. I read it as anger. The "S&M pain
slut" comment notwithstanding (which is the tip of the iceberg), Linda and
her ilk have been quite hurtful to bluemoon over the years.
Linda has not lost her marbles again. She has not had marbles in a long,
long time. If no one said anything, she would still do it.
I know you like none of this. I will take my share of responsibility for
creating this situation. The only one who won't is Linda.
Pablo
> --
> RB |\ © Randall Bart
> aa |/ admin@RandallBart.spam.com Barticus@att.spam.net
> nr |\ Please reply without spam I LOVE YOU 1-917-715-0831
> dt ||\ Just a mouse and a maze: http://mouse.brainthru.com
> a |/ Siberian Kittens: http://kittens.brainthru.com
> l |\ DOT-HS-808-065 The Church Of The Unauthorized Truth:
> l |/ MS^7=6/28/107 http://yg.cotut.com mailto:s@cotut.com
| |
|
| Archive: Linda aka adinl aka tiffanyattrop wrote:
> I was reading through the archives and ran across ASt posters vengeful
> campaign to exact retribution against Dr. Laura for suggesting it be ok to
> exclude a child with tourettes from a wedding.
>
> How shallow and hypocritical it is for AST posters to engage in aggressive
> activiities to purge and cleanse TS'ers from AST, a support group chartered
> specifically for TS'ers, while the the purgers engage in vengefilled
> campaigned to exact retribution against Dr. Laura for saying it be ok to
> exclude from a wedding.
>
> I truly don't understand why TS'ers believe society is under an obligation
> to include TS'ers in their weddings, when these very same posters are
> engaging in aggressive activities to purge and cleanse and exclude TS'ers
> from their own support groups chartered for them.
>
> This message brought to you in mourning over the recent existential dead
> bodies of Nonitpic, Sara and JMM whom were run off of AST by lies and
> slander, threats and a neverending stream of insults, and being treated
> like pieces of shit, by persons who chose to gather on this support group
> to demean, degrade, denigrate, mock, insult and ridicule the people whom
> the group was chartered to support.
| |
|
| Linda, can you please give us more info about that PAC?
I'd like to join.
Its goals are consistent with the needs of ast: to end your cyberstalking and
cyberharassing of support groups.
Tiffanyattrop aka Linda aka adinl wrote:
>
> Really?
>
> Years ago I used to peel a few Franklin's off the top of my stash, then drive
> over to the Commerce Club. .
>
> Once inside the Commerce Club, I would have the floorman put my name on the
> Omaha list. .
>
> Then, I would walk over to the cage and exchange a Franklin for a rack of blue
> and wait for my nym to be called.
>
> When my nym was called and I was told where to go, I would take a seat
> amongst the rocks, sharks, fish, at the table and any sweaters or
> railbirds spectating.
>
> I would then await my blinds.
>
> When the blind came to me, I would take some bullets out of my rack and place
> them by the blind and receive a draw.
>
> Which put me in action.
>
> When action was complete, the flop was then placed in the middle of the
> green, accompanied by another round of action.
>
> When that round of action was complete, the turn was placed in the middle of
> the green, accompanied by another round of action.
>
> When that round of action was complete, the river was placed in the middle of
> the green, accompanied by another round of action.
>
> If I was still in after the river it was usually because I had been wired and
> the river had tripped me up with the nuts, so as to lay a bad beat on all the
> rocks, sharks and fish taking part in the action. .
>
> So I would rake in all the bullets except those required to set up the KILL.
>
> Unless you are familiar with the slang, you might well believe a person who
> posts about having been wired, and having tripped up with the nuts, to lay a
> bad beat on a group of fish, sharks, and rocks, to rake in all the bullets
> and set up the KILL has lost his/her marbles.
>
> Same is true in cyberspace.
>
> My being a member of a PAC who is calling for stringent and all encompassing
> legislation to deter cyberstalkers from cyberharassing private citizens,
> results in my having picked up all manner of slang owing to constant
> discussion of aggressive activities some people engage in to annoy, harass,
> and distress others in cyberpace.
>
> Just cause you aren't familiar with the slang employed by persons seeking more
> stringent legislation to deter cyberstalking---doesn't make me NUTS for
> employing slang when I discuss the AST posters who engage in aggressive
> activities to annoy, harass or distress other AST posters.
>
> The "slang" term for successfully running posters off a ng by engaging in
> aggressive activities to run them off the ng is "cyberkill".
>
> Certain AST posters have 3 "cyberkills" to their credit this month.
>
> While perusing the archives I ran across posts evidencing some ASt posters
> sought to crucify Dr. Laura for suggesting it be AOK to exclude children with
> tourettes from wedding.
>
> I found it ironic that persons who have 3 "cyberkills" to their credit just
> this month, sought to crucify Dr. Laura for suggesting it be AOK for society
> to exclude children with tourettes from weddings.
>
> I honestly don't see any reason why Dr. Laura ought to have been crucified
> for suggesting it be AOK to exclude children with tourettes from weddings,
> when persons in the tourettes community are engaging in aggressive activities
> to exclude people with tourettes or parents of children with tourettes from
> participating in on line support groups chartered for them.
>
> Charity begins at home.
| |
|
| "TSN" <tsnw@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:41842E54.C8BA9EDD@optonline.net...
> Linda, can you please give us more info about that PAC?
> I'd like to join.
> Its goals are consistent with the needs of ast: to end your cyberstalking
and
> cyberharassing of support groups.
I would like more information about this organization, too. I wonder if
it's registered. I've searched for k00kPAC, but I haven't found anything.
;-)
And this whole Nonitpic, Sara and JMM leaving thing is silly. Is Linda
speaking for these folks? Who gave her the right to speak on their behalf?
It's called smoke and mirrors. It's also called Linda taking advantage of
an opportunity.
Pablo
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Tiffanyattrop aka Linda aka adinl wrote:
>
then drive[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
of blue[vbcol=seagreen]
seat[vbcol=seagreen]
place[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
middle of[vbcol=seagreen]
middle of[vbcol=seagreen]
wired and[vbcol=seagreen]
all the[vbcol=seagreen]
the KILL.[vbcol=seagreen]
who[vbcol=seagreen]
to lay a[vbcol=seagreen]
bullets[vbcol=seagreen]
encompassing[vbcol=seagreen]
harass,[vbcol=seagreen]
seeking more[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
posters[vbcol=seagreen]
children with[vbcol=seagreen]
just[vbcol=seagreen]
society[vbcol=seagreen]
crucified[vbcol=seagreen]
weddings,[vbcol=seagreen]
activities[vbcol=seagreen]
from[vbcol=seagreen]
| |
|
| Pablo wrote:
> And this whole Nonitpic, Sara and JMM leaving thing is silly. Is Linda
> speaking for these folks? Who gave her the right to speak on their behalf?
>
> It's called smoke and mirrors. It's also called Linda taking advantage of
> an opportunity.
I had chalked it off to her having some morbid interest in discussing "body
counts" and "killings" so she invents these "cyberdeaths" (maybe as a curious
"shoot yourself in the foot" way of pointing out how much of ast *she* has
killed off.)
--
Tourette Syndrome - Now What?
http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
| |
|
| Randall Bart wrote:
> 'Twas Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:21:51 GMT when all alt.support.tourette stood in
> awe as bluemoon <bluemoon@milkyway.net> uttered:
>
>
> Well you're right, and I wish you wouldn't act so smug about it. Lnida
> has lost her marbles again, and it seems to happen when the pooper
> troopers from s.p.p descend on a.s.t to attack her.
I don't see the evidence to support this, Randall.
Bluemoon has been mentioned by Linda, ad nauseum, regardless of whether SPPers
are here or not and regardless of anything Bluemoon does to provoke (or not)
Linda.
Pablo was mentioned over and over again in Linda's rants, even when he
remained silent for quite a while.
Back in the days when Linda was ruining asa-d as she is now ruining ast, she
carried conversations to and fro between ngs, regardless of the responses here
or input from SPPers. (Historical note: for 2 or 3 years (?), asa-d was a
virtual wasteland because of Linda and her thousands of socks. When she found
more fertile ground in her quest for a virtual audience -- ast, where one
person embraced her -- she completely abandoned asa-d, and guess what? Today,
asa-d is as normally functioning as a support group on Usenet can be. The
change was almost instantaneous upon Linda's departure there.)
Here on ast, Linda targets people no matter what benign positions they may
have taken here. Of note, her recent inclusion of Lara on her hit list for
merely having a conversation, and KC for simply giving good news about her
daughter, even though neither of them has really engaged Linda.
Conclusion: Linda's mission to attack and destroy ngs has nothing to do with
whether or not SPPers post here, and it no longer seems appropriate for us to
ask them to be silent here if Linda continues to mention them, here and all
over Usenet.
It's that double standard thing again: Linda thinks there is one standard for
her and another for everyone else. If she can start living by one standard,
then I'll be willing to go back to asking the people who aren't ast regulars
to keep it out of here, but for now, it seems that Linda *is* here, and she
*does* talk about them, so they have a right to respond.
--
Tourette Syndrome - Now What?
http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
| |
|
| "TSN" <tsnw@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:41850108.AD41AB07@optonline.net...
> Pablo wrote:
>
>
> I had chalked it off to her having some morbid interest in discussing
> "body
> counts" and "killings" so she invents these "cyberdeaths" (maybe as a
> curious
> "shoot yourself in the foot" way of pointing out how much of ast *she* has
> killed off.)
No, Linda is parroting others. She is also being overly dramatic, which is
the general tone of her posts. One person (she) becomes a "we." A
difference of opinion becomes an "act of harassment." Her bout of
indigestion became "heart attacks." She also tries to pit person against
person.
Let me use Sara as an example. Linda has suggested that Sara is not here
because "stalkers" ran her off. Presumably, Linda is referring to me. I
know that you and Sara had disagreements. Linda tried exploiting these.
Moreover, Linda seems to think I had a negative online relationship with
Sara. Quite the contrary. I don't know where Sara is, but I enjoyed
chatting with her in posts. Others might have different opinions about
this; I don't know. I found Sara to be an inspiring person based on my
interactions with her. She and I didn't agree on everything, but that
doesn't mean I don't like her as a person. Frankly I'd love for Sara to
come back (if she is indeed gone).
People make their own choices when they post/don't post, me included. For
the most part, I stand by my choices (I have a few regrets). I also take
responsibility for my choices.
Perhaps Linda has been in touch with Nonitpic, Sara, and JMM, and they have
indicated to her that they don't feel welcome on AST anymore. Maybe this is
what she is using to give herself the right to speak for them. Who knows.
If they are lurking, I would encourage them to speak for themselves instead
of allowing (a) Linda to be a mouthpiece and/or (b) themselves to be used as
puppets.
Pablo
> --
> Tourette Syndrome - Now What?
> http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
| |
|
|
"Pablo" <nono@yes.com> wrote in message
news:_Hdhd.14002$5i5.10090@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>I found Sara to be an inspiring person based on my
> interactions with her. She and I didn't agree on everything, but that
> doesn't mean I don't like her as a person. Frankly I'd love for Sara to
> come back (if she is indeed gone).
Well said. Me too. 
Jodi
| |
| SOandSO@webtv.net 2004-10-31, 7:09 pm |
| This is the old chain letter. Its'
more then s--- it's stupid.
| |
|
| Pablo wrote:
> Let me use Sara as an example. Linda has suggested that Sara is not here
> because "stalkers" ran her off.
hmmmm ....
> Presumably, Linda is referring to me. I
> know that you and Sara had disagreements.
Sara and I were doing fine.
> Frankly I'd love for Sara to come back (if she is indeed gone).
Me, too.
(And I agree with the *if*.)
--
Tourette Syndrome - Now What?
http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
| |
|
| "TSN" <tsnw@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4185843E.28DCF6B7@optonline.net...
> Pablo wrote:
>
>
> hmmmm ....
>
>
> Sara and I were doing fine.
I'm glad to hear this. Frankly, things got so chaotic for a bit that I'm
not sure who all was angry at whom, and to what extent. I know that a lot
of people had questions about me when I first started posting here, and I'm
guessing some folks still do. Sara was wary of me, I think, but we seemed
to overcome it. I like her humor.
>
> Me, too.
> (And I agree with the *if*.)
Me too to your me too. I hope she is still around. For someone who was
critical of me, I came to respect her for her "life force" and sense of
determination.
Pablo
> --
> Tourette Syndrome - Now What?
> http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
>
>
| |
| Randall Bart 2004-11-01, 2:08 am |
| 'Twas Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:21:51 GMT when all alt.support.tourette stood in
awe as bluemoon <bluemoon@milkyway.net> uttered:
>My God, you're full of shit.
Well you're right, and I wish you wouldn't act so smug about it. Lnida
has lost her marbles again, and it seems to happen when the pooper
troopers from s.p.p descend on a.s.t to attack her. I am not sure why you
do this.
--
RB |\ © Randall Bart
aa |/ admin@RandallBart.spam.com Barticus@att.spam.net
nr |\ Please reply without spam I LOVE YOU 1-917-715-0831
dt ||\ Just a mouse and a maze: http://mouse.brainthru.com
a |/ Siberian Kittens: http://kittens.brainthru.com
l |\ DOT-HS-808-065 The Church Of The Unauthorized Truth:
l |/ MS^7=6/28/107 http://yg.cotut.com mailto:s@cotut.com
| |
|
| "Randall Bart" <Barticus@att.spam.net> wrote in message
news:svs5o0pcbsa1pbsd71f0qda240otaf9lra@4ax.com...
> 'Twas Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:21:51 GMT when all alt.support.tourette stood in
> awe as bluemoon <bluemoon@milkyway.net> uttered:
>
>
> Well you're right, and I wish you wouldn't act so smug about it. Lnida
> has lost her marbles again, and it seems to happen when the pooper
> troopers from s.p.p descend on a.s.t to attack her. I am not sure why you
> do this.
Bluemoon is not a pooper trooper from s.p.p. She comes from elsewhere on
the alt.support hierarchy.
I don't read her words as smugness. I read it as anger. The "S&M pain
slut" comment notwithstanding (which is the tip of the iceberg), Linda and
her ilk have been quite hurtful to bluemoon over the years.
Linda has not lost her marbles again. She has not had marbles in a long,
long time. If no one said anything, she would still do it.
I know you like none of this. I will take my share of responsibility for
creating this situation. The only one who won't is Linda.
Pablo
> --
> RB |\ © Randall Bart
> aa |/ admin@RandallBart.spam.com Barticus@att.spam.net
> nr |\ Please reply without spam I LOVE YOU 1-917-715-0831
> dt ||\ Just a mouse and a maze: http://mouse.brainthru.com
> a |/ Siberian Kittens: http://kittens.brainthru.com
> l |\ DOT-HS-808-065 The Church Of The Unauthorized Truth:
> l |/ MS^7=6/28/107 http://yg.cotut.com mailto:s@cotut.com
| |
|
| Archive: Linda aka adinl aka tiffanyattrop wrote:
> I was reading through the archives and ran across ASt posters vengeful
> campaign to exact retribution against Dr. Laura for suggesting it be ok to
> exclude a child with tourettes from a wedding.
>
> How shallow and hypocritical it is for AST posters to engage in aggressive
> activiities to purge and cleanse TS'ers from AST, a support group chartered
> specifically for TS'ers, while the the purgers engage in vengefilled
> campaigned to exact retribution against Dr. Laura for saying it be ok to
> exclude from a wedding.
>
> I truly don't understand why TS'ers believe society is under an obligation
> to include TS'ers in their weddings, when these very same posters are
> engaging in aggressive activities to purge and cleanse and exclude TS'ers
> from their own support groups chartered for them.
>
> This message brought to you in mourning over the recent existential dead
> bodies of Nonitpic, Sara and JMM whom were run off of AST by lies and
> slander, threats and a neverending stream of insults, and being treated
> like pieces of shit, by persons who chose to gather on this support group
> to demean, degrade, denigrate, mock, insult and ridicule the people whom
> the group was chartered to support.
| |
|
| Noon Cat Nick wrote:
> What we need 'round here are deep hypocrites.
You don't think that Linda aka adinl aka tiffanyattrop decrying
"cyberharassment and cyberstalking," while supporting those very
activities, is not deep enough?
--
Tourette Syndrome - Now What?
http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
| |
| Tiffanyattrop 2004-11-02, 11:11 am |
| >ject: Re: Shallow hypocrits
>From: Noon Cat Nick chatdemidiSPAMBEGONE@catlover.com
>Date: 10/30/04 1:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time
>Message-id: <418356D1.CFE67192@catlover.com>
>
>What we need 'round here are deep hypocrites.
>
:-)
| |
|
| Linda, can you please give us more info about that PAC?
I'd like to join.
Its goals are consistent with the needs of ast: to end your cyberstalking and
cyberharassing of support groups.
Tiffanyattrop aka Linda aka adinl wrote:
>
> Really?
>
> Years ago I used to peel a few Franklin's off the top of my stash, then drive
> over to the Commerce Club. .
>
> Once inside the Commerce Club, I would have the floorman put my name on the
> Omaha list. .
>
> Then, I would walk over to the cage and exchange a Franklin for a rack of blue
> and wait for my nym to be called.
>
> When my nym was called and I was told where to go, I would take a seat
> amongst the rocks, sharks, fish, at the table and any sweaters or
> railbirds spectating.
>
> I would then await my blinds.
>
> When the blind came to me, I would take some bullets out of my rack and place
> them by the blind and receive a draw.
>
> Which put me in action.
>
> When action was complete, the flop was then placed in the middle of the
> green, accompanied by another round of action.
>
> When that round of action was complete, the turn was placed in the middle of
> the green, accompanied by another round of action.
>
> When that round of action was complete, the river was placed in the middle of
> the green, accompanied by another round of action.
>
> If I was still in after the river it was usually because I had been wired and
> the river had tripped me up with the nuts, so as to lay a bad beat on all the
> rocks, sharks and fish taking part in the action. .
>
> So I would rake in all the bullets except those required to set up the KILL.
>
> Unless you are familiar with the slang, you might well believe a person who
> posts about having been wired, and having tripped up with the nuts, to lay a
> bad beat on a group of fish, sharks, and rocks, to rake in all the bullets
> and set up the KILL has lost his/her marbles.
>
> Same is true in cyberspace.
>
> My being a member of a PAC who is calling for stringent and all encompassing
> legislation to deter cyberstalkers from cyberharassing private citizens,
> results in my having picked up all manner of slang owing to constant
> discussion of aggressive activities some people engage in to annoy, harass,
> and distress others in cyberpace.
>
> Just cause you aren't familiar with the slang employed by persons seeking more
> stringent legislation to deter cyberstalking---doesn't make me NUTS for
> employing slang when I discuss the AST posters who engage in aggressive
> activities to annoy, harass or distress other AST posters.
>
> The "slang" term for successfully running posters off a ng by engaging in
> aggressive activities to run them off the ng is "cyberkill".
>
> Certain AST posters have 3 "cyberkills" to their credit this month.
>
> While perusing the archives I ran across posts evidencing some ASt posters
> sought to crucify Dr. Laura for suggesting it be AOK to exclude children with
> tourettes from wedding.
>
> I found it ironic that persons who have 3 "cyberkills" to their credit just
> this month, sought to crucify Dr. Laura for suggesting it be AOK for society
> to exclude children with tourettes from weddings.
>
> I honestly don't see any reason why Dr. Laura ought to have been crucified
> for suggesting it be AOK to exclude children with tourettes from weddings,
> when persons in the tourettes community are engaging in aggressive activities
> to exclude people with tourettes or parents of children with tourettes from
> participating in on line support groups chartered for them.
>
> Charity begins at home.
| |
| Pablo 2004-11-02, 11:11 am |
| "TSN" <tsnw@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:41842E54.C8BA9EDD@optonline.net...
> Linda, can you please give us more info about that PAC?
> I'd like to join.
> Its goals are consistent with the needs of ast: to end your cyberstalking
and
> cyberharassing of support groups.
I would like more information about this organization, too. I wonder if
it's registered. I've searched for k00kPAC, but I haven't found anything.
;-)
And this whole Nonitpic, Sara and JMM leaving thing is silly. Is Linda
speaking for these folks? Who gave her the right to speak on their behalf?
It's called smoke and mirrors. It's also called Linda taking advantage of
an opportunity.
Pablo
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Tiffanyattrop aka Linda aka adinl wrote:
>
then drive[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
of blue[vbcol=seagreen]
seat[vbcol=seagreen]
place[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
middle of[vbcol=seagreen]
middle of[vbcol=seagreen]
wired and[vbcol=seagreen]
all the[vbcol=seagreen]
the KILL.[vbcol=seagreen]
who[vbcol=seagreen]
to lay a[vbcol=seagreen]
bullets[vbcol=seagreen]
encompassing[vbcol=seagreen]
harass,[vbcol=seagreen]
seeking more[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
posters[vbcol=seagreen]
children with[vbcol=seagreen]
just[vbcol=seagreen]
society[vbcol=seagreen]
crucified[vbcol=seagreen]
weddings,[vbcol=seagreen]
activities[vbcol=seagreen]
from[vbcol=seagreen]
| |
|
| Pablo wrote:
> And this whole Nonitpic, Sara and JMM leaving thing is silly. Is Linda
> speaking for these folks? Who gave her the right to speak on their behalf?
>
> It's called smoke and mirrors. It's also called Linda taking advantage of
> an opportunity.
I had chalked it off to her having some morbid interest in discussing "body
counts" and "killings" so she invents these "cyberdeaths" (maybe as a curious
"shoot yourself in the foot" way of pointing out how much of ast *she* has
killed off.)
--
Tourette Syndrome - Now What?
http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
| |
|
| Randall Bart wrote:
> 'Twas Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:21:51 GMT when all alt.support.tourette stood in
> awe as bluemoon <bluemoon@milkyway.net> uttered:
>
>
> Well you're right, and I wish you wouldn't act so smug about it. Lnida
> has lost her marbles again, and it seems to happen when the pooper
> troopers from s.p.p descend on a.s.t to attack her.
I don't see the evidence to support this, Randall.
Bluemoon has been mentioned by Linda, ad nauseum, regardless of whether SPPers
are here or not and regardless of anything Bluemoon does to provoke (or not)
Linda.
Pablo was mentioned over and over again in Linda's rants, even when he
remained silent for quite a while.
Back in the days when Linda was ruining asa-d as she is now ruining ast, she
carried conversations to and fro between ngs, regardless of the responses here
or input from SPPers. (Historical note: for 2 or 3 years (?), asa-d was a
virtual wasteland because of Linda and her thousands of socks. When she found
more fertile ground in her quest for a virtual audience -- ast, where one
person embraced her -- she completely abandoned asa-d, and guess what? Today,
asa-d is as normally functioning as a support group on Usenet can be. The
change was almost instantaneous upon Linda's departure there.)
Here on ast, Linda targets people no matter what benign positions they may
have taken here. Of note, her recent inclusion of Lara on her hit list for
merely having a conversation, and KC for simply giving good news about her
daughter, even though neither of them has really engaged Linda.
Conclusion: Linda's mission to attack and destroy ngs has nothing to do with
whether or not SPPers post here, and it no longer seems appropriate for us to
ask them to be silent here if Linda continues to mention them, here and all
over Usenet.
It's that double standard thing again: Linda thinks there is one standard for
her and another for everyone else. If she can start living by one standard,
then I'll be willing to go back to asking the people who aren't ast regulars
to keep it out of here, but for now, it seems that Linda *is* here, and she
*does* talk about them, so they have a right to respond.
--
Tourette Syndrome - Now What?
http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
| |
|
|
"Pablo" <nono@yes.com> wrote in message
news:_Hdhd.14002$5i5.10090@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>I found Sara to be an inspiring person based on my
> interactions with her. She and I didn't agree on everything, but that
> doesn't mean I don't like her as a person. Frankly I'd love for Sara to
> come back (if she is indeed gone).
Well said. Me too.
Jodi
| |
| SOandSO@webtv.net 2004-11-04, 11:09 am |
| This is the old chain letter. Its'
more then s--- it's stupid.
| |
|
| Pablo wrote:
> Let me use Sara as an example. Linda has suggested that Sara is not here
> because "stalkers" ran her off.
hmmmm ....
> Presumably, Linda is referring to me. I
> know that you and Sara had disagreements.
Sara and I were doing fine.
> Frankly I'd love for Sara to come back (if she is indeed gone).
Me, too.
(And I agree with the *if*.)
--
Tourette Syndrome - Now What?
http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
| |
|
| "TSN" <tsnw@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4185843E.28DCF6B7@optonline.net...
> Pablo wrote:
>
>
> hmmmm ....
>
>
> Sara and I were doing fine.
I'm glad to hear this. Frankly, things got so chaotic for a bit that I'm
not sure who all was angry at whom, and to what extent. I know that a lot
of people had questions about me when I first started posting here, and I'm
guessing some folks still do. Sara was wary of me, I think, but we seemed
to overcome it. I like her humor.
>
> Me, too.
> (And I agree with the *if*.)
Me too to your me too. I hope she is still around. For someone who was
critical of me, I came to respect her for her "life force" and sense of
determination.
Pablo
> --
> Tourette Syndrome - Now What?
> http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
>
>
| |
|
| I, too, find a daily bath helpful. ;-)
As for where you are going...yep, sounds like it's your way of dealing with
it. It's a person's right to pick that special place (or those special
places). Don't know where yours is, but I hope it's like Eden.
For some reason, though, I'm thinking of "I know why the caged bird sings."
Perhaps home is where one bathes. :-)
Pablo
"What about Bob??" <ka1yon@charter.net> wrote in message
news:10on2r8o5pmmp8c@corp.supernews.com...
> Hey I know that I am NOT welcome here nor back in my home state nor here
> down south(( that one I know why.......I bath at least once a day not once
> a month or longer a most do here)
> It fact I have never felt welcome any where in my entire life save one
> spot where by this time next year I plan to be back on................my
> way of dealing with this fact?
> "WTF, it is YOUR problem so you deal with it" LOL
>
> "Pablo" <nono@yes.com> wrote in message
> news:_Hdhd.14002$5i5.10090@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
>
|
| |
|
|