| Elected Newsgroup leader Chuck 2006-07-28, 4:23 pm |
| Liberals: Born to run
By Ann Coulter
I knew the events in the Middle East were big when The New York Times
devoted nearly as much space to them as it did to a New York court
ruling last week rejecting gay marriage.
Some have argued that Israel's response is disproportionate, which is
actually correct: It wasn't nearly strong enough. I know this because
there are parts of South Lebanon still standing.
Most Americans have been glued to their TV sets, transfixed by Israel's
show of power, wondering, "Gee, why can't we do that?"
Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean says that "what's
going on in the Middle East today" wouldn't be happening if the
Democrats were in power. Yes, if the Democrats were running things, our
cities would be ash heaps and the state of Israel would have been wiped
off the map by now.
But according to Dean, the Democrats would have the "moral authority
that Bill Clinton had" -- no wait! keep reading -- "when he brought
together the Israelis and Palestinians." Clinton really brokered a
Peace in Our Time with that deal -- "our time" being a reference to
that five-minute span during which he announced it. Yasser Arafat
immediately backed out on all his promises and launched the second
intifada.
The fact that Israel is able to launch an attack on Hezbollah today
without instantly inciting a multination conflagration in the Middle
East is proof of what Bush has accomplished. He has begun to create a
moderate block of Arab leaders who are apparently not interested in
becoming the next Saddam Hussein.
There's been no stock market crash, showing that the markets have
confidence that Israel will deal appropriately with the problem and
that it won't expand into World War III.
But liberals can never abandon the idea that we must soothe savage
beasts with appeasement -- whether they're dealing with murderers like
Willie Horton or Islamic terrorists. Then the beast eats you.
There are only two choices with savages: Fight or run. Democrats always
want to run, but they dress it up in meaningless catchphrases like
"diplomacy," "detente," "engagement," "multilateral engagement,"
"multilateral diplomacy," "containment" and "going to the U.N."
I guess they figure, "Hey, appeasement worked pretty well with ... uh
.... wait, I know this one ... ummm ... tip of my tongue ..."
Democrats like to talk tough, but you can never trap them into
fighting. There is always an obscure objection to be raised in this
particular instance -- but in some future war they would be intrepid!
One simply can't imagine what that war would be.
Democrats have never found a fight they couldn't run from.
On "Meet the Press" last month, Sen. Joe Biden was asked whether he
would support military action against Iran if the Iranians were to go
"full-speed-ahead with their program to build a nuclear bomb."
|