|
Home > Archive > Lyme Disease > October 2004 > McSweegan the stalker *****s up again
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
McSweegan the stalker *****s up again
|
|
| lyme rayja 2004-10-23, 10:07 pm |
| Derdrittemann says that I am lying about McSweegan asking a friend to
forward a mail anonymously to hide his identity. Well, here is the
proof.
Lisa
>Thomas Forschner, an accountant and the foundation's executive
director
who
founded the group with his wife, Karen Vanderhoof-Forschner, an
insurance
underwriter, said the group tries to be scientifically accurate. "We
try
not
to bias things one way or another," he said. "We've taken a rational
and
reasonable approach."
>Forschner believes the government's vision of Lyme disease is too
narrow
and he calls McSweegan a "stalker" inexplicably obsessed with the
foundation. As an example, he said, McSweegan last year tried to send
an
anonymous derogatory statement about the foundation to a widely read
Lyme
disease Internet site by having a friend forward the message from a
different computer. The friend forgot to delete McSweegan's
instructions,
however, making it apparent who was behind the message.
| |
| derdrittemann 2004-10-25, 2:09 am |
| lymerayja@yahoo.co.uk (lyme rayja) wrote in message news:<13f7f806.0410180955.26171c85@posting.google.com>...
> "Derdrittemann says that I am lying about McSweegan asking a friend to
> forward a mail anonymously to hide his identity. Well, here is the
> proof".
> Lisa
EXCUSE ME?
Where did I say such a thing? Whether "McSweegan" or anyone else has
scammed or "punked" this board in the past is NOT evidence that they
or anyone else is doing so currently. Get that through your extremely
dense cranium.
Only you are dumb enough to believe Weisman is Chuck and they are both
"McSweegan".
All that means is that it may have ocurred in the past. And...that it
is possible now. It is possible. What's your evidence?
>
> director
> who"...
>
> What is the point of this?
You mean if Thomas F. says so...must be true? I don't think that's the
way it works.
(By the way, Tom and the LDF issued a statement awhile back about this
great "law" they passed that was supposed to help all of
us...and...turns out it was just a lot of "puffery"...meaningless
language surrounding an appropriations bill).
I never saw a retraction or clarification.
|
| |
|
|