Lyme Disease - New Website for Kathleen Dickson up

Author

New Website for Kathleen Dickson up

lyme rayja

2004-10-15, 7:19 pm

www.lyme-rage.info/kd/index.html

JWismille

2004-10-15, 10:07 pm

stupid waste of time.

Its like starting a website in support of Susan Smith. Monster Mom's

RMAgricola

2004-10-16, 7:09 pm

Why did you waste your time then, going to the new website for Kathleen
Dickson? Don't you have anything better to do with your time than harass the
people in this newsgroup?

Do you really know anything about Kathleen's situation that you wish to share
with us ?

Martha A.

JWismille

2004-10-16, 7:09 pm

>Don't you have anything better to do with your time than harass the
>people in this newsgroup?

Listen Martha Moxley, I only go after the trolls like Lisa, Janis, Frank and
Kathleen when she was free. I can't stand these creeps hurting others with
mis-information on treatment and doctors. Then you have the Cape Cod homo but
he is so stupid its a waste of time to respond to his dumb XXX.

>Do you really know anything about Kathleen's situation that you wish to share
>with us ?

Nope, just that she is having fun with her new butch cellmate at night. lol

Greatcod

2004-10-16, 10:07 pm

Great website...and great name...We are coming, and we are pissed off.

Greatcod

2004-10-17, 2:07 am

Maybe we can form LymeRage units, based on location, and call them
Infected
Cells. Hello, John Ashcroft. Just kidding, Mr. AG..
I am watching the Red Sox, and the Curse of the Bambino seems to
be especially powerful tonight..

Frank de Groot

2004-10-17, 7:07 am

"lyme rayja" <lymerayja@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message

> www.lyme-rage.info/kd/index.html

A suggestion:

Make a page that has a title: "Is Kathleen really crazy"?

Mention that she is on forced psychotropics, that she has been branded a
"terrorist", that her kids have been taken away etc.

Then, put ten or so of her most lucid statements on that page.
Pick the least wacko-sounding ones.

Kathleen has written a lot of stuff that clearly shows she is not crazy and
that she could be a "legal" danger to some powerful people.

Include a few lines in which she offer scientific evidence for her position
and back it up with footnotes pointing to publications. Include the
publications as mirrorred documents on the site.

This page will serve as an important tool for journalists to be able to
support Kathleen's case. If they simply would look at her website, they
would think she's crazy.

But if you look objectively at her case and look at the evidence presented
against her, and Kathleen's most lucid statements, then it becomes
overwhelmingly clear that she has been set up.

There are more things you could do.

You could include another page with victims of government/corporate
collusion on Lyme. You can include Lisa Masterson (yourself).

Another way to score credibility with journalists is to give sources.
When you say that two MD's have commited suicide bec. they were barred from
treating Lyme, if I were an average journalist I would say: "Well, this is
just bullshit".

If you disclose those MD's names then perhaps their suicide contributes to
saving a life.

Misplaced "political correctness" and hiding in the dark afraid of
ligitation will NOT give you credit with the journaille.

Then, another page is useful with medical publications about how Lyme causes
neurological changes, how it is devilishly hard to treat etc.

Mirror all documents according to "fair use" permissions. Only include the
very best documents.

I think the website itself looks very good.
The only thing it needs is hard evidence, crystal-clear case presentation
and incentives for journalists world-wide to build a nice story.

You have to basically write that story. But you can only present journalists
with a juicy story when you do all the hard work of mentioning sources,
cross-referencing data, make it easy to verify your statements etc.

You could prepare a "press statement" as a PDF + Word document that anyone
can use.

Another thing: Kathleen could become more of a "person" (and invite pity
etc.) if you put a photo of her on the site. Choose a portrait in which she
looks into the lense (and doesn't look weird, find a good picture or
nothing).

Then, another page you need is personal testimonies about Kathleen.
Like: "I have visited Kathleen many times and she is a wonderful mother",
that sort of thing.

BUT: Signed with name + city!

I am afraid that your laudable initiative will fizzle because frankly, both
you and Kathleen ARE a bit wacky and both have shown that you are grossly
inefficient in presenting your case.

Last time I tried to be helpful I asked some info of you.
You ignored me.

With a website, your goal is to deliver info to journalists and
decision-makers.

Your website witholds that information.

If you want a shot at helping your & Kathleen's case, you have to loose your
fears and give much more information.

lyme rayja

2004-10-17, 11:07 am

jwismille@aol.com (JWismille) wrote in message news:<20041016195736.24357.00001937@mb-m16.aol.com>...
>
> Listen Martha Moxley, I only go after the trolls like Lisa, Janis, Frank and
> Kathleen when she was free. I can't stand these creeps hurting others with
> mis-information on treatment and doctors.

Hey Mcfilth-ball,give one example of where I have given misinfo on
treatment or doctors.

YOU have posted tonnes of dangerous misinformation, over and over. In
particular that garbage from your Quackwatch web-page.

Then you have the Cape Cod homo but
> he is so stupid its a waste of time to respond to his dumb XXX.

It's usually closet gay men who invent this kind of crap. Of course ,
in your case, you're trisexual - men, women and farm animals.

>
>
> Nope, just that she is having fun with her new butch cellmate at night. lol

She's in a co-ed facility. Who knows. Despite all her suffering, in
that one arena of her life, she is probably having more fun than you
with your farm animals and medieval corpses.
Lisa

derdrittemann

2004-10-17, 7:09 pm

"Frank de Groot" <franciad@online.no> wrote in message news:<m3tcd.2452$rh1.70842@news2.e.nsc.no>...
> "lyme rayja" <lymerayja@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>
>
> A suggestion:
>
> Make a page that has a title: "Is Kathleen really crazy"?

No, Frank.

Kathleen was placed in a psychiatric ward by court order through a
legal process...a judge ordered her there for her own good.

She got there, by the way, apparently from threatening, abusing and
harrassing people. Perhaps a word to the wise.

Lisa just refuses to acknowledge this FACT...or even mention
it...deliberately trying to leave the impression that Kathleen was
somehow victimized...

....so that Lisa can continue to spout her lunacy at Kathleen's
expense.

It's a legal process.

We don't try these things on the internet.

(Aren't you the VERY same person who insisted that Kathleen was a
"NUTCASE"...

....just a few dys ago?

ROFLAMAO.

(Did Lisa give you a good talking to? Bad, bad Frank).

Greatcod

2004-10-17, 10:07 pm

OK, OK, we get get it. The LAW is SO powerful. Lawyers are so powerful. You
are so powerful.

derdrittemann

2004-10-18, 11:07 am

Greatcod@Yahoo.com (Greatcod) wrote in message news:<caef409e.0410171843.7eb5083d@posting.google.com>...

> "OK, OK, we get get it. The LAW is SO powerful. Lawyers are so powerful. You
> are so powerful".

NO.

Clearly, you don't "get it". Lisa is not telling the whole truth. She
has omitted the little detail of Kathleen's hearing(s)(?) concerning
her mental competency and how she wound up in a state psychiatric
facility.

I am talking about a situation where she had the right to counsel and
the right to present evidence and witnesses on her behalf and to
cross-examine those of the state.

Yet, the little Chihuahua alleges a "gross civil rights abuse".

Why?

Did you ever hear the expression "two sides to every story"?

Did it ever occur to you that there might be another aspect to this of
which you just might not be aware? And...that you, therefore, are
really in no position to judge?

Did it ever occur to you that you do not have to reply to every
posting here with some mindless drivel that then forces others to have
to waste their time to correct?

JWismille

2004-10-18, 11:07 am

>From: derdrittemann2003@yahoo.com (derdrittemann)
>Date: 10/18/2004 11:21 AM Eastern

>I am talking about a situation where she had the right to counsel and
>the right to present evidence and witnesses on her behalf and to
>cross-examine those of the state.
>
>Yet, the little Chihuahua alleges a "gross civil rights abuse".

I figured that. Nothing that Lisa says is true.

Lisa is lost, she is a moron who was a puppet for kathleen and now that the
ring leader is locked up she is going nuts trying to figure out what to do.

She is harmless, well unless you are her x-husband and there are kitchen knives
around.lol

Sinaj101

2004-10-18, 7:09 pm

>Listen Martha Moxley, I only go after the trolls like Lisa, Janis, Frank and
>Kathleen when she was free.

Wow! I seldom come here and I am still being mentioned. I must have really
pissed you off good.

::patting self on back::

derdrittemann

2004-10-18, 7:09 pm

jwismille@aol.com (JWismille) wrote in message news:<20041018115948.27265.00002730@mb-m03.aol.com>...
> "Lisa is lost, she is a moron who was a puppet for kathleen and now that the
> ring leader is locked up she is going nuts trying to figure out what to do".

Like a little yapping dog whose owners moved away and have left her
chained to a stake in the backyard...

....where all she can do is piteously yap out, "McSweegan, McSweegan".

Sorta just tears your heart out, don't it?

JWismille

2004-10-18, 7:09 pm

>From: derdrittemann2003@yahoo.com (derdrittemann)

>Like a little yapping dog whose owners moved away and have left her
>chained to a stake in the backyard...
>
>...where all she can do is piteously yap out, "McSweegan, McSweegan".
>
>Sorta just tears your heart out, don't it?

Tears it out like a sharp kitchen knife in a domestic disput.

JWismille

2004-10-19, 11:08 am

lyme rayja

2004-10-19, 7:14 pm

JWismille

2004-10-22, 7:07 am