|
Home > Archive > Drugs pot > December 2006 > Happy Birthday Kath aRe
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Happy Birthday Kath aRe
|
|
| BraBurner 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| You all know who she is, don't cha?
| |
| michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
BraBurner wrote:
> You all know who she is, don't cha?
Some fugly whore?
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| BraBurner wrote:
> You all know who she is, don't cha?
She's the one stole me 'at, last party I was at!
Y'already got me gift, Kath. Wear it in good 'ealth. ;-)
| |
| michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
Michael wrote:
> BraBurner wrote:
>
>
> She's the one stole me 'at, last party I was at!
>
> Y'already got me gift, Kath. Wear it in good 'ealth. ;-)
You are another old phuck ...
| |
| BraBurner 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| > > You all know who she is, don't cha?
>
> She's the one stole me 'at, last party I was at!
> Y'already got me gift, Kath. Wear it in good 'ealth. ;-)
I don't know what to say...
I'm raking leaves inbetween all this.
| |
| michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
BraBurner wrote:
>
> I don't know what to say...
>
> I'm raking leaves inbetween all this.
In between what?
Stuffing your fat face with chocolate
bon bons?
| |
| BuZZard 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"BraBurner" <broken1111@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1164392316.954288.239490@14g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
> You all know who she is, don't cha?
HAPPY HATCH DAY! YaY!
| |
| BraBurnerBudLess 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| >> You all know who she is, don't cha?
>
> HAPPY HATCH DAY! YaY!
Where have you been?
| |
| BuZZard 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"BraBurnerBudLess" <okcancel@apply.net> wrote in message
news:_NH9h.546$ZM.484@newsfe11.lga...
>
> Where have you been?
sleepin off turkey
| |
| michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
BraBurnerBudLess wrote:
And in swoops buzzard to save the thread!
Yay!
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Where have you been?
If it was up your XXX you'd know ...
| |
| Meat Plow 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:18:37 -0800, BraBurner Has Frothed:
> You all know who she is, don't cha?
Nope, who is she?
--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794
| |
| BuZZard 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"michael" <yost536@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1164396877.191764.122810@l39g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> BraBurnerBudLess wrote:
>
> And in swoops buzzard to save the thread!
> Yay!
>
>
>
> If it was up your XXX you'd know ...
Worst thanksgiving experience for me...
the peanut butter fudge got hidden.. like.. and I got like.. one piece..
and today.. we get to eat it all again.. cept for the
peanut butter fudge.
and.. I made homemade turkey gravy.. like mom use to do..
for the first time.. and damn. .it came out great. I bought some allready
made.. and mine was better.
The worst part.. prolly not having enough nugs to just.. sNoke my self
silly.. but.. i did have some bud.
| |
| Paisley Sky 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
michael wrote:
> BraBurner wrote:
>
> In between what?
> Stuffing your fat face with chocolate
> bon bons?
How old are you? 11?
| |
| michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
Paisley Sky wrote:
> michael wrote:
>
>
> How old are you? 11?
I am 32, and you are 45.
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| michael wrote:
> BraBurner wrote:
>
>
>
> Some fugly whore?
>
Eww!
who got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning?
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Paisley Sky 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
michael wrote:
> Paisley Sky wrote:
>
> I am 32, and you are 45.
guess again
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| michael wrote:
> BraBurner wrote:
>
>
>
> In between what?
> Stuffing your fat face with chocolate
> bon bons?
>
OK, what's up?
maybe this is an impersonator?
Michael does not behave like this.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Paisley Sky 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" wrote:
> michael wrote:
>
> Eww!
> who got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning?
nah
He got up on the wrong side of humanity. The dark side.
>
>
> --
> God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
> michael wrote:
>
> OK, what's up?
> maybe this is an impersonator?
>
> Michael does not behave like this.
As long as the judge sees RFG as he is ...
| |
| BraBurner 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| > >>>>You all know who she is, don't cha?
> OK, what's up?
> maybe this is an impersonator?
> Michael does not behave like this.
Calm down grandpa.
It's michael with a lower case "m".
It's a slimball troll much along the lines of a Scum Bag.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
>
>
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?as_...536@hotmail.com
>
>
??
this link is a search on header clips?
not completly understanding your reference.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Not me... he was replying to SB who replied to me.
>
> He's just one of those people who got handed a bunch of life's lemons, and
> likes to salt them and rub them into other folks' open sores. :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
I am comforted.
<snuggles & brushes SnoWhite>
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
>
> ??
>
> this link is a search on header clips?
>
> not completly understanding your reference.
It's a search on posts authored by "small-m".
Know thine enema.
| |
| BraBurner 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
Michael wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
>
>
> It's a search on posts authored by "small-m".
>
> Know thine enema.
| |
| BraBurner 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| > It's a search on posts authored by "small-m".
>
> Know thine enema.
I started this post to wish Mrs. aRe a happy birthday not to talk about
enemas or slime butt trolls.
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
>
>
>
>
> It's a search on posts authored by "small-m".
>
> Know thine enema.
>
>
ahhh...
how does the "path" in the headers work then?
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| BraBurner wrote:
> You all know who she is, don't cha?
>
The beautiful and talented wife of Shaun Rae
deserves all the best from all of us.
an angel of patience, she stuck with the man while going through
financial troubles this year
This is a great and memorable act for posterity and a reminder
to all misogynists that some women are beautiful both inside and out.
Happy birthday Kathrine.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| BraBurnerBudLess 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| >> You all know who she is, don't cha?
> The beautiful and talented wife of Shaun Rae
> deserves all the best from all of us.
>
> an angel of patience, she stuck with the man while going through
> financial troubles this year
>
> This is a great and memorable act for posterity and a reminder
> to all misogynists that some women are beautiful both inside and out.
>
> Happy birthday Kathrine.
That's better, thank you.
--
?<<(~.~)>>? S. Buds of the Lusty Female Plant
I'm not quoting Shaun aRe anymore.
If I get it wrong, he yells at me.
So I'll quote Michael who pisses in the snow.
| |
| FrozenNorth 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Mowe Z. Slowley tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
> Michael wrote:
>
> ahhh...
>
> how does the "path" in the headers work then?
>
Read it from left to right, 'm' is posting through googlegroups, 'M' is
posting through qcislands.net.
--
Froz...
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
> ahhh...
>
> how does the "path" in the headers work then?
Oh... took me a sec to figger what you meant...
If you click on the title of one of the posts in the search, you'll get a
page with some posts on it.
The first message that appears at the top when that page opens is one that
"small-m" wrote. Does that clarify it any?
| |
| BraBurnerBudLess 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| >> You all know who she is, don't cha?
> The beautiful and talented wife of Shaun Rae
> deserves all the best from all of us.
>
> an angel of patience, she stuck with the man while going through
> financial troubles this year
>
> This is a great and memorable act for posterity and a reminder
> to all misogynists that some women are beautiful both inside and out.
>
> Happy birthday Kathrine.
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| BraBurner wrote:
>
>
> I started this post to wish Mrs. aRe a happy birthday not to talk about
> enemas or slime butt trolls.
>
better now?
the point I made about reminding misogynists of the true nature of
Beauty is important to me personally.
--
Truth is the highest form of the manifestation of GOD present in the
universe since the beginning of time. The flame of truth only exists in
the most rare instant of times, and then decays into...
Beauty, the second manifestation of GOD. Beauty is the first to condense
from the afterlife of raw truth. It is here that most exploration of
GOD's mysteries is commonly done, simply because it is more available
for study than truth. Raw truth is actually much more awesome than
simple beauty; it's just a lot harder to find, that's all. Beauty
eventually decays into HIS lower forms. The two byproducts of beauty are
charm, and strangeness.
Charm is often mistaken for truth, except it isn't nearly heavy enough.
A truth quark weighs in at around the mass of an atom of gold, whereas
many hundereds of charm quarks would otherwise be required to amass that
much power.
Strange is also a flavour given off by beauty. It behaves much like
beauty, but doesn't radiate as much. Strangeness often obscures the
clear view, making it difficult to detect whether any real truth is
actually hidden deep within. Strangeness has nearly as much influence as
charm, but not quite. All of the above forms of GOD are transient, that
is to say, they all decay into the base materials:
Up and Down. All of the universe which you can materially perceive is
made of Up and Down quarks. These tiniest and least massive of reality's
building blocks are the final and most stable form of GOD's creation.
When all of life has only these left, then all the majic is gone, forever.
To conclude our little lecture on quantum-chromo dynamics; quarks fall
into two classes, defined by the way they behave. Truth, Charm, and Up
quarks are members of the same family, while Beauty, Strange, and Down
quarks form the compliment. The only significant difference between
members of the same family is that they have different weights and life
spans. They are listed here from powerful and short lived; to light and
stable.
...Jeffery O. Bucove: Mar 1993 /inspired by love (edited Nov 2000 to
update the mass of truth, determined experimentally at CERN in late 1998)/
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| FrozenNorth wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
>
> Read it from left to right, 'm' is posting through googlegroups, 'M'
> is posting through qcislands.net.
Oh, DUH!! <flagellates self with cauldronful of linguine>
I thought the "path" MZSyumpinJJ asked about was the pile of stuff that
google turned up in the search. :-\
Yeah. What FN sed, Mowe Z.
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Oh... took me a sec to figger what you meant...
>
> If you click on the title of one of the posts in the search, you'll get a
> page with some posts on it.
>
> The first message that appears at the top when that page opens is one that
> "small-m" wrote. Does that clarify it any?
>
>
Yes.
Thank You.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| FrozenNorth wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
>
>
>
> Read it from left to right, 'm' is posting through googlegroups, 'M' is
> posting through qcislands.net.
knowledge is such a wonderful thing.
thanks.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Meat Plow 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:47:15 -0800, BraBurner Has Frothed:
>
> I started this post to wish Mrs. aRe a happy birthday not to talk about
> enemas or slime butt trolls.
EARTH TO BRABURNER or whatever nickname you're trolling with this hour.
--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Meat Plow wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:47:15 -0800, BraBurner Has Frothed:
>
>
>
>
> EARTH TO BRABURNER or whatever nickname you're trolling with this hour.
>
Isn't he nice?
Such a nice guy.
Warm hearted, thoughtful, pleasant. A real Santa if I ever knew one.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
> BraBurner wrote:
>
> better now?
>
> the point I made about reminding misogynists of the true nature of
> Beauty is important to me personally.
Your point was eloquently (*and* elegantly) made, for those of us who are
*not* misogynists... but unfortunately the target can't understand Beauty
and will never even try.
Pity them.
Do *not* forgive them.
| |
| BraBurnerBudLess 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| >>> It's a search on posts authored by "small-m".
>
> EARTH TO BRABURNER or whatever nickname you're trolling with this hour.
I'm ignoring you.
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Your point was eloquently (*and* elegantly) made, for those of us who are
> *not* misogynists... but unfortunately the target can't understand Beauty
> and will never even try.
>
> Pity them.
>
> Do *not* forgive them.
>
>
Misogynists have something in common with other recluse'..
Only they can forgive themselves.
I so love beauty, and femininity.
You are lucky to have your friend in Van.
I hope you will be able to be together soon.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Musky Lure 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| In article <xNqdnWSLouxu8frYnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@qcislands.net>,
"Michael" <muirhead@haidagwaii.net> wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
>
> Oh... took me a sec to figger what you meant...
>
> If you click on the title of one of the posts in the search, you'll get a
> page with some posts on it.
>
> The first message that appears at the top when that page opens is one that
> "small-m" wrote. Does that clarify it any?
I think Mowe was referring to the posting path to be found in each
message header. Usually, your browser only displays a message with only
rudimentary information as to who/where that message came from. But you
can see more detailed information by looking for a "show headers" or
"show details" command in your browser menu. In your case, I can see
you are using Outlook Express, which I haven't used in aeons so I can't
tell you exactly how to view detailed headers using that browser, but
you can easily figure it out.
More information about two posters' comparative identities can be
derived from an examination of the nntp posting host. Also, just
comparing browser information is sometimes enough to get reasonable
assurance that two posting personalities may have the same identity if
they are careless not to conceal their deception (or had other reasons
in having multiple identities other than to deceive). There's more, but
someone else will need to explain it because I'm not all that usenet
savvy.
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
> Misogynists have something in common with other recluse'..
> Only they can forgive themselves.
>
>
> I so love beauty, and femininity.
>
> You are lucky to have your friend in Van.
Am I ever clear on *that* concept! I dreamed of her for over 3 *decades*,
man.
> I hope you will be able to be together soon.
I'll be there in 20 days. :-)
Oh, uhhh... you mean TOGETHER, together? Couple of years, at the very
least. :-(
She's gonna be right where she is until she retires and/or her son moves
out. She loves her field of work and has a great position, and the boy's
just 13.
I ain't movin' til Cub's shuffled offa this mortal coil. No bloody *way*
I'm gonna stick a back-country dog in a city... and my hunny agrees entirely
(though we've both felt really badly at times about the thought of "waiting
for him to die").
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Musky Lure wrote:
> In article <xNqdnWSLouxu8frYnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@qcislands.net>,
> "Michael" <muirhead@haidagwaii.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> I think Mowe was referring to the posting path to be found in each
> message header.
Mm-hmm. I guessed that - though a little late.
> Usually, your browser only displays a message with
> only rudimentary information as to who/where that message came from.
> But you can see more detailed information by looking for a "show
> headers" or "show details" command in your browser menu.
Yep.
I ran a Fido-Net BBS with Usenet feeds from 1988-1990. Despite the years
passed, the beers pounded and the pounds smoked, I remember. :-)
> In your
> case, I can see
> you are using Outlook Express, which I haven't used in aeons so I
> can't tell you exactly how to view detailed headers using that
> browser, but
> you can easily figure it out.
>
> More information about two posters' comparative identities can be
> derived from an examination of the nntp posting host.
Because I get nntp service from Giganews (they're my ISP's nntp provider),
my NNTP-posting-host header is always my own IP, which was static and always
the same until just couple of weeks ago, when my ISP finally got hold of
sufficient (and stable enough) bandwidth - we're on an island and all
bandwidth here to mainland is via line-of-sight microwave link - but had to
accept upstream dynamic IP allocation to get it.
> Also, just
> comparing browser information is sometimes enough to get reasonable
> assurance that two posting personalities may have the same identity if
> they are careless not to conceal their deception (or had other reasons
> in having multiple identities other than to deceive). There's more,
> but someone else will need to explain it because I'm not all that
> usenet savvy.
There's *lots* more, but you've covered the (normally) most useful stuff
really well. :-)
| |
| Meat Plow 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:14:33 +0000, Mowe Z. Slowley Has Frothed:
> Meat Plow wrote:
>
> Isn't he nice?
>
> Such a nice guy.
>
> Warm hearted, thoughtful, pleasant. A real Santa if I ever knew one.
BraBurner isn't a guy, stupid.
--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Meat Plow wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:14:33 +0000, Mowe Z. Slowley Has Frothed:
>
>
> BraBurner isn't a guy, stupid.
Speaking of stupid...
MZS was talking about *you*.
| |
| Meat Plow 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:15:23 -0500, BraBurnerBudLess Has Frothed:
>
> I'm ignoring you.
Really?
Ignore = don't read and reply.
--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794
| |
| Meat Plow 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:49:53 -0800, Michael Has Frothed:
> Meat Plow wrote:
>
>
> Speaking of stupid...
>
> MZS was talking about *you*.
Speaking of stupid...
I see you don't know when you've been trolled.
--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Meat Plow" <meat@meatplow.local> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.11.24.23.13.28.557000@nntp.sun-meatplow.local...
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:49:53 -0800, Michael Has Frothed:
>
>
> Speaking of stupid...
>
> I see you don't know when you've been trolled.
Of course I do.
Sometimes spraying the resulting excrement on the fisher is worth eating
negative-calorie bait.
| |
| Mycoloteur 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
BraBurner wrote:
> You all know who she is, don't cha?
Indeed! And best birthday wishes to her.
Love and Light
| |
| Meat Plow 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:21:07 -0800, Michael Has Frothed:
>
> "Meat Plow" <meat@meatplow.local> wrote in message
> news:pan.2006.11.24.23.13.28.557000@nntp.sun-meatplow.local...
>
> Of course I do.
>
> Sometimes spraying the resulting excrement on the fisher is worth eating
> negative-calorie bait.
Nice back pedal. What do you do for an encore, fag lames?
--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Am I ever clear on *that* concept! I dreamed of her for over 3 *decades*,
> man.
>
>
>
>
> I'll be there in 20 days. :-)
>
> Oh, uhhh... you mean TOGETHER, together? Couple of years, at the very
> least. :-(
>
> She's gonna be right where she is until she retires and/or her son moves
> out. She loves her field of work and has a great position, and the boy's
> just 13.
>
> I ain't movin' til Cub's shuffled offa this mortal coil. No bloody *way*
> I'm gonna stick a back-country dog in a city... and my hunny agrees entirely
Good on ya.
Frankly, I think it's a crime to stick a back-country human in the City
as well....
> (though we've both felt really badly at times about the thought of "waiting
> for him to die").
>
>
I have a friend who has told me he's leaving me a $3M property.
He has a metastatic brain tumor.
I feel your pain.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| BraBurner 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| > > You are lucky to have your friend in Van.
>
> Am I ever clear on *that* concept! I dreamed of her for over 3 *decades*,
> man.
>
>
> I'll be there in 20 days. :-)
> Oh, uhhh... you mean TOGETHER, together? Couple of years, at the very
> least. :-(
> She's gonna be right where she is until she retires and/or her son moves
> out. She loves her field of work and has a great position, and the boy's
> just 13.
> I ain't movin' til Cub's shuffled offa this mortal coil. No bloody *way*
> I'm gonna stick a back-country dog in a city... and my hunny agrees entirely
> (though we've both felt really badly at times about the thought of "waiting
> for him to die").
You should not be living alone.
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Meat Plow wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:14:33 +0000, Mowe Z. Slowley Has Frothed:
>
>
>
>
> BraBurner isn't a guy, stupid.
>
>
that was for you, stupid.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"BraBurner" <broken1111@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1164410977.044638.58300@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> You should not be living alone.
I'm not.
Cub's here. :-)
So there. :-P
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> "Meat Plow" <meat@meatplow.local> wrote in message
> news:pan.2006.11.24.23.13.28.557000@nntp.sun-meatplow.local...
>
>
>
> Of course I do.
>
> Sometimes spraying the resulting excrement on the fisher is worth eating
> negative-calorie bait.
>
>
Oh gawd that's a good laugh.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
|
| > Michael does not behave like this.
Michael is not michael...
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
news:8fL9h.10777$1U5.9354@edtnps90...
> Michael wrote:
>
>
> Good on ya.
> Frankly, I think it's a crime to stick a back-country human in the City
> as well....
If it's against his/her will, you're absolutely right.
I've long ago resigned myself to eventually having to move back to the city
(I was born and raised in *Toronto* FFS) bacause late-stage MS requires care
I can't get anywhere else.
>
> I have a friend who has told me he's leaving me a $3M property.
> He has a metastatic brain tumor.
>
> I feel your pain.
Yeah, but just like me, you know right down to the core who's your friend.
:-)
My fingers are crossed that you and your bud get to hang out in good health
and good spirits to the end, and that you're able to put his stuff to use in
the same spirit he might have intended if he'd had more time.
| |
| FrozenNorth 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
>
> "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
> news:8fL9h.10777$1U5.9354@edtnps90...
>
> If it's against his/her will, you're absolutely right.
>
> I've long ago resigned myself to eventually having to move back to the
> city (I was born and raised in *Toronto* FFS) bacause late-stage MS
> requires care I can't get anywhere else.
Hey, I resemble that remark, Toronto is cool, if you live in a good
neighbourhood.
>
>
>
> Yeah, but just like me, you know right down to the core who's your friend.
> :-)
>
> My fingers are crossed that you and your bud get to hang out in good
> health and good spirits to the end, and that you're able to put his stuff
> to use in the same spirit he might have intended if he'd had more time.
--
Froz...
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
> news:8fL9h.10777$1U5.9354@edtnps90...
>
>
>
> If it's against his/her will, you're absolutely right.
>
> I've long ago resigned myself to eventually having to move back to the city
> (I was born and raised in *Toronto* FFS) bacause late-stage MS requires care
> I can't get anywhere else.
>
>
>
>
>
> Yeah, but just like me, you know right down to the core who's your friend.
> :-)
>
> My fingers are crossed that you and your bud get to hang out in good health
> and good spirits to the end, and that you're able to put his stuff to use in
> the same spirit he might have intended if he'd had more time.
>
>
We are jamming regularly.
He's an awesome bass player.
T.O., eh?
whew! very buzy place.
Ever hang at Rochdale?
maybe we met there....
Didn't know you had the medical problem...
Get the licence before you return to Civilization.
You will need uninterrupted supplies of good pot.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Spencer Spindrift 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Musky Lure" <muskylure@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:muskylure-EC123C.15270424112006@news.zianet.com...
> In article <xNqdnWSLouxu8frYnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@qcislands.net>,
> "Michael" <muirhead@haidagwaii.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> I think Mowe was referring to the posting path to be found in each
> message header. Usually, your browser only displays a message with only
> rudimentary information as to who/where that message came from. But you
> can see more detailed information by looking for a "show headers" or
> "show details" command in your browser menu. In your case, I can see
> you are using Outlook Express, which I haven't used in aeons so I can't
> tell you exactly how to view detailed headers using that browser, but
> you can easily figure it out.
Right click on a message. Select "properties" at the bottom. Click on the
tab "Details" and OE shows the headers.
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
news:ijL9h.10803$1U5.2619@edtnps90...
> Michael wrote:
>
> Oh gawd that's a good laugh.
(He hasn't figgered out yet that after the sales pitch is made, the next one
who speaks directly is inevitably the loser in the exchange.)
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"~xy~" <ByRequestOnly@cyber-rights.net> wrote in message
news:RlL9h.360684$1T2.92071@pd7urf2no...
>
> Michael is not michael...
Merci mille fois... je me souviens qu'en autres temps, tout le monde avait
abandonné cette idée.
| |
| Spencer Spindrift 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
news:q4K9h.276$Hp3.150@clgrps13...
> BraBurner wrote:
> better now?
>
> the point I made about reminding misogynists of the true nature of
> Beauty is important to me personally.
>
> --
> Truth is the highest form of the manifestation of GOD present in the
> universe since the beginning of time. The flame of truth only exists in
> the most rare instant of times, and then decays into...
>
> Beauty, the second manifestation of GOD. Beauty is the first to condense
> from the afterlife of raw truth. It is here that most exploration of
> GOD's mysteries is commonly done, simply because it is more available
> for study than truth. Raw truth is actually much more awesome than
> simple beauty; it's just a lot harder to find, that's all. Beauty
> eventually decays into HIS lower forms. The two byproducts of beauty are
> charm, and strangeness.
>
> Charm is often mistaken for truth, except it isn't nearly heavy enough.
> A truth quark weighs in at around the mass of an atom of gold, whereas
> many hundereds of charm quarks would otherwise be required to amass that
> much power.
>
> Strange is also a flavour given off by beauty. It behaves much like
> beauty, but doesn't radiate as much. Strangeness often obscures the
> clear view, making it difficult to detect whether any real truth is
> actually hidden deep within. Strangeness has nearly as much influence as
> charm, but not quite. All of the above forms of GOD are transient, that
> is to say, they all decay into the base materials:
>
> Up and Down. All of the universe which you can materially perceive is
> made of Up and Down quarks. These tiniest and least massive of reality's
> building blocks are the final and most stable form of GOD's creation.
> When all of life has only these left, then all the majic is gone, forever.
>
> To conclude our little lecture on quantum-chromo dynamics; quarks fall
> into two classes, defined by the way they behave. Truth, Charm, and Up
> quarks are members of the same family, while Beauty, Strange, and Down
> quarks form the compliment. The only significant difference between
> members of the same family is that they have different weights and life
> spans. They are listed here from powerful and short lived; to light and
> stable.
>
> ..Jeffery O. Bucove: Mar 1993 /inspired by love (edited Nov 2000 to
> update the mass of truth, determined experimentally at CERN in late 1998)/
Nice little story but you won't convince me there are more than 4 types of
quark or of the existence of god.
Quantum theory is quite magical enough without bringing god or extra quarks
into it.
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
news:7tL9h.5667$p9.1048@edtnps82...
> Ever hang at Rochdale?
Uhhh, yeah... but that was *WAY* back.... I mean like when I was still 10-11
years old.
My aunt (she lives on Galiano now, a few doors from Rochedale (well, UofT)
friend
> maybe we met there....
Unless it was in the vegetarian "deli" (uhhh... building at/near Bloor and
Huron?), probably not.
> Didn't know you had the medical problem...
> Get the licence before you return to Civilization.
I've tallked to my doc about it (just weeks before the
Nazi^H^H^H^HReform^H^H^H^H^H^HCRAP^H^H^H^HConservative Party got hold of the
legislature, and we've both agreed it makes a hell of a lot of sense not to
bother applying before there's another party in government.
> You will need uninterrupted supplies of good pot.
I grow mine... won't touch much else... and so far, I still have exactly
that. :-))))
| |
| BraBurnerBudLess 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| >> Michael does not behave like this.
>
> Michael is not michael...
>
Duh, we got that all settled already. Catch up.
| |
|
| > Duh, we got that all settled already. Catch up.
Jus' makin' sure my neighbour is not mistook for michael...
(Having an attitude day?)
| |
| BraBurner 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| > > Duh, we got that all settled already. Catch up.
>
> Jus' makin' sure my neighbour is not mistook for michael...
> (Having an attitude day?)
As I have previously stated, I know my Michael.
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Spencer Spindrift wrote:
> "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
> Nice little story but you won't convince me there are more than 4 types of
> quark or of the existence of god.
> Quantum theory is quite magical enough without bringing god or extra quarks
> into it.
>
>
Well, yeah; that's my point. I use lyrical poetry and artistic symbology
as important communication tools, not to mention artistic outlet.
Perhaps you are feeling a little left brain heavy?
But: I'm curious about your 4 quark thing.
That's quantum-electro dynamics, totally outdated for the last 20 years.
They already measured the weight of the Top quark before shutting down
the tevatron, and CERN is warming up again for the LHC...
Where are you?
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
> news:7tL9h.5667$p9.1048@edtnps82...
>
>
>
>
> Uhhh, yeah... but that was *WAY* back.... I mean like when I was still 10-11
> years old.
>
Way for you.
Yesterday for me.
> My aunt (she lives on Galiano now, a few doors from Rochedale (well, UofT)
> friend
>
Hmm.
Did a shitload of acid during that time.
>
>
>
> Unless it was in the vegetarian "deli" (uhhh... building at/near Bloor and
> Huron?), probably not.
>
Sure. even worked there for a bit. I was like, 18-19?
| |
| Sean Carroll 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> "~xy~" <ByRequestOnly@cyber-rights.net> wrote
[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Merci mille fois... je me souviens qu'en autres temps, tout le monde avait
> abandonné cette idée.
Perhaps people would be less confused if you chose a different screen name?
Personally, I don't understand why someone would want to go by such a
common simple first name, anyway. How is anyone to know you from the
3805984365643 other Michaels they meet every day? (Just musing, not
trying to say something nasty.)
--
--Sean
http://spclsd223.livejournal.com/
'Oh god, you're upset about something. You're gonna open up to me now,
aren't you?' --Dr Gregory House
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| ~xy~ wrote:
>
>
> Jus' makin' sure my neighbour is not mistook for michael...
> (Having an attitude day?)
>
>
??
never.
attitude is for flying; right, SB?
by neighbour I take it you mean related ISP servers?
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
news:JsN9h.11768$1U5.3478@edtnps90...
> Michael wrote:
>
> Sure. even worked there for a bit. I was like, 18-19?
I was (summer 1969 - autumn 1971)... uhhh, definitely 9-11 years old.
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
> Spencer Spindrift wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
No I won't, you are right.
I am not tenured at 6 figures.
I don't get paid enough to convince anybody, much less lurkers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark
Try reading some up to date material.
PS: GOD is a strain. Aren't you a little stressed? |teeheeheehee!!|
And..
no pickin' flywing comments from the peanut gallery, either!
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"FrozenNorth" <frozennorth123@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1312759.rXh6hGhK4r@frozennorth.to...
> Michael tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
>
> Hey, I resemble that remark, Toronto is cool, if you live in a good
> neighbourhood.
Yeah?
My mom lives there. Pretty house with a deck and a pool, in a real "nice
Scarborough neighbourhood"... owned free and clear, worth hundreds of
thousands of bux, "Nice" neighbourhood... yeah, right.
It's less than a mile from where I was born, but I wouldn't move there for
all the bud in BC.
Cops there (my step-dad gives me regular reports) have even less respect for
human deceny than they do here in BC... and that's seriously XXXXing *sick*.
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Sean Carroll wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Perhaps people would be less confused if you chose a different screen name?
>
> Personally, I don't understand why someone would want to go by such a
> common simple first name, anyway. How is anyone to know you from the
> 3805984365643 other Michaels they meet every day? (Just musing, not
> trying to say something nasty.)
>
But that's the whole point!
It's usenet!
How did I recognize the impostor?
From the underlying spirit behind the poast!
Dig the space we are in.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
> news:JsN9h.11768$1U5.3478@edtnps90...
>
>
>
> I was (summer 1969 - autumn 1971)... uhhh, definitely 9-11 years old.
>
>
Well that makes you authentic.
that's exactly how long it lasted.
Pierre Trudeau set it up in '68 as a social experiment. It was to be a
combination free college and student housing project.
by '73 the city had pumped concrete up the plumbing to 'encourage' the
last squatters to leave.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
>
>
> Well that makes you authentic.
> that's exactly how long it lasted.
>
> Pierre Trudeau set it up in '68 as a social experiment. It was to be a
> combination free college and student housing project.
>
> by '73 the city had pumped concrete up the plumbing to 'encourage' the
> last squatters to leave.
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_College
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
news:TRN9h.11949$1U5.6044@edtnps90...
> Michael wrote:
>
> Well that makes you authentic.
> that's exactly how long it lasted.
>
> Pierre Trudeau set it up in '68 as a social experiment. It was to be a
> combination free college and student housing project.
>
> by '73 the city had pumped concrete up the plumbing to 'encourage' the
> last squatters to leave.
You're forgetting the part about the Angels (I met a couple of them) who
decsended for the regulation, regimentation and remittance (oh XXXX... I
mean.,the protecton) of the pot wholesalers and the few LSD/meth labs on
campus.
It wasn't rosy, man.
Even so, I prefer the social/moral/quasi-legal spirit that prevailed there
then to *anything* I've seen in North America in the past 20 years.
*Including* Haida Gwaii in 2006. 
| |
| FrozenNorth 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
>
> "FrozenNorth" <frozennorth123@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1312759.rXh6hGhK4r@frozennorth.to...
>
>
> Yeah?
>
> My mom lives there. Pretty house with a deck and a pool, in a real "nice
> Scarborough neighbourhood"... owned free and clear, worth hundreds of
> thousands of bux, "Nice" neighbourhood... yeah, right.
>
> It's less than a mile from where I was born, but I wouldn't move there for
> all the bud in BC.
>
> Cops there (my step-dad gives me regular reports) have even less respect
> for human deceny than they do here in BC... and that's seriously XXXXing
> *sick*.
I'm on the other side of the city Etobicoke, life is good here.
--
Froz...
| |
| Michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"FrozenNorth" <frozennorth123@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1550803.JBPSXkXy9T@frozennorth.to...
> Michael tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
>
>
> I'm on the other side of the city Etobicoke, life is good here.
Don't count on that... my old boss used to live there and had similar
troubles.
Ain't *no* place safe from assholes wanna mess with people live a good and
healthy life. :-(
| |
| FrozenNorth 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
>
> "FrozenNorth" <frozennorth123@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1550803.JBPSXkXy9T@frozennorth.to...
>
> Don't count on that... my old boss used to live there and had similar
> troubles.
>
> Ain't *no* place safe from assholes wanna mess with people live a good and
> healthy life. :-(
I have been here the last eleven years, no probs, before that I was in
Mississauga, no troubles in either place.
--
Froz...
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Michael wrote:
> "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
> news:TRN9h.11949$1U5.6044@edtnps90...
>
>
>
> You're forgetting the part about the Angels (I met a couple of them) who
> decsended for the regulation, regimentation and remittance (oh XXXX... I
> mean.,the protecton) of the pot wholesalers and the few LSD/meth labs on
> campus.
>
> It wasn't rosy, man.
>
> Even so, I prefer the social/moral/quasi-legal spirit that prevailed there
> then to *anything* I've seen in North America in the past 20 years.
>
> *Including* Haida Gwaii in 2006.
>
>
oh, I have a couple stories.
I watched a flower in a vase open at the security desk one dawn.
With Tony, who was my champion amongst the Vagabonds. Some sweet girl
brought them down before dawn on her way to work in the restaurant. I
had finnished my shift at the radio station. (translation: I was comming
down from my peak: they had to stop me from comming in because I was
shaking all the windows and glass in the whole place.) So while I sat at
the desk with Tony and a couple other colors, this girl brings in the
vase with the big Digitalis buds, and we watched it open while the sun
came up.
Another time (while NOT tripping) I was sitting with two fellows who
were doing a deal for a pound of pot in the ashram. One was a resident,
and the outsider had his buddy waiting in the hall. I was hoping for a
toke. Well, the outsider grabbs the pound and beats it for the fire
exit, his buddy running ahead. The fire cases had vertical round posts
at the foot of every handrail in the middle. I could leap from one
landing down and grab the post, swing on it with a single footstep, and
fly down to the next one. I had been practicing this move while
tripping. I could do it well. So I caught up to the rip carrying after
buddy had beat him down and opened the door for him. Nailed him and
waited for Tony. Waved byebye to his buddy, who got the message.
Some other color showed up first and this brain dead twit thought I was
somehow involved and he was the hero. I hjope Tony is in heaven. He sure
has my vote.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| FrozenNorth wrote:
> Michael tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
>
>
>
>
> I have been here the last eleven years, no probs, before that I was in
> Mississauga, no troubles in either place.
>
hey hey guys.
Michael, you are going to have to make certain sacrifices to move back
to the city.
Froze, I know you hold anybody who can live in the extreme boonies in
high regard.
I wish I had one (Michael div Froze) of your collective knowledge about
tech.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Sean Carroll 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Spencer Spindrift wrote:
> "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote
[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
Don't take any of this too seriously. 'Strangeness', 'charm' and
'beauty' in quarks have absolutely *nothing* to do with what those words
signify in everyday life. They are abstract quantum numbers, existing in
abstract mathematical space, that are merely given convenient and
memorable labels.
The so-called 'flavour' quantum numbers for particles include:
- lepton number (L)
- baryon number (B)
- isospin (Iz)
- strangeness (S)
- charm (C)
- bottomness or 'beauty' (B')
- topness or 'truth' (T)
- hypercharge (Y = B + S + C + B' + T)
- electric charge (Q = Iz + Y/2)
- weak isospin (Tz)
- weak hypercharge (YW)
Interactions through the strong force (one of the four fundamental
forces, alongside the weak, electromagnetic, and gravitational forces)
preserve all the flavour numbers. Two quantities are preserved in all
interactions: the electric charge (Q) and the difference of baryon and
lepton number (B - L).
Of the rest, several are preserved in strong and electromagnetic
interactions, but not in weak ones (the gravitational force has a
negligible effect on individual particles): isospin (Iz), strangeness
(S), charm (C), bottomness (B') and topness (T). These are the
quantities of the most importance for classifying quarks.
All quarks have B = 1/3. They also have either Iz = 1/2 or Iz = -1/2.
Those with Iz = 1/2 are in the 'up' family, and those with Iz = -1/2 are
in the 'down' family.
Within the 'up' family, there are three quarks: the 'charm' quark (which
has C = 1 and T = 0), the 'top' quark (which has T = 1 and C = 0), and
the regular 'up' quark (which has C = T = 0).
Within the 'down' family, there are also three quarks: the 'strange'
quark (S = 1 and B' = 0), the 'bottom' quark (B' = 1 and S = 0), and the
regular 'down' quark (S = B' = 0).
In point of fact, the *official* names for these quarks are all just
letters: u, d, c, s, t, b. The 'full names' (up, down, charm, strange,
top or truth, bottom or beauty) are officially nothing more than
mnemonics. (Note also that almost no one uses 'beauty' and 'truth'
anymore; any working physicist will call them 'bottom' and 'top'.)
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Nice little story but you won't convince me there are more than 4
> types of quark or of the existence of god. Quantum theory is quite
> magical enough without bringing god or extra quarks into it.
There is nothing 'extra' about the six basic types of quark. The
classification arises from deep abstract symmetries. In fact, depending
on how you count, there may actually be 36 'different' quarks: each one
of the six basic types comes in three 'colours' ('red', 'green', and
'blue', again having nothing to do with colour in everyday life but
merely an imaginative label for an abstract property), and each one of
those 18 comes in a 'quark' and an 'antiquark' form.
Actually, *all* quarks are nothing more than theoretical, mathematical
constructs: one has never been actually observed, and many believe one
never *could* be. They are the mathematical 'components' of real,
observed particles, and the only reason we use them as a model in theory
is because they express the observed symmetries very well. Some people
imagine that they 'really' exist, 'inside' baryons and mesons. Others
imagine that they are merely a trick to make the equations come out
right. The truth may lie in some combination of both these viewpoints.
But there's no reason to declare that one type of quark is less 'real'
than another. They used to only think there were u, d, c, and s, but
that was because b and t just hadn't been discovered (or invented,
depending on your view) yet. They are nothing whatsoever like a
hypothesis about 'god'. They are a necessary addition to the quark model
to explain certain classes of observed particles -- such as B mesons and
W bosons.
Given our current state of experimental knowledge about particles, there
are either six quarks (times three colours plus antiquarks), or none.
Four quarks simply do not suffice to describe all of the particle
interactions that have been observed. God, on the other hand, is treated
by physics as Laplace (I think it was) once said: 'I have no need of
that hypothesis, sir.'
--
--Sean
http://spclsd223.livejournal.com/
'Oh god, you're upset about something. You're gonna open up to me now,
aren't you?' --Dr Gregory House
| |
| FrozenNorth 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Mowe Z. Slowley tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
> FrozenNorth wrote:
>
> hey hey guys.
>
> Michael, you are going to have to make certain sacrifices to move back
> to the city.
>
> Froze, I know you hold anybody who can live in the extreme boonies in
> high regard.
>
> I wish I had one (Michael div Froze) of your collective knowledge about
> tech.
>
No probs here, I know my tech, but love my city, going downtown tomorrow,
gonna party with my beautiful wife, can life get better?
;-)
--
Froz...
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Sean Carroll wrote:
> Spencer Spindrift wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Don't take any of this too seriously. 'Strangeness', 'charm' and
> 'beauty' in quarks have absolutely *nothing* to do with what those words
> signify in everyday life. They are abstract quantum numbers, existing in
> abstract mathematical space, that are merely given convenient and
> memorable labels.
>
> The so-called 'flavour' quantum numbers for particles include:
> - lepton number (L)
> - baryon number (B)
> - isospin (Iz)
> - strangeness (S)
> - charm (C)
> - bottomness or 'beauty' (B')
> - topness or 'truth' (T)
> - hypercharge (Y = B + S + C + B' + T)
> - electric charge (Q = Iz + Y/2)
> - weak isospin (Tz)
> - weak hypercharge (YW)
>
> Interactions through the strong force (one of the four fundamental
> forces, alongside the weak, electromagnetic, and gravitational forces)
> preserve all the flavour numbers. Two quantities are preserved in all
> interactions: the electric charge (Q) and the difference of baryon and
> lepton number (B - L).
>
> Of the rest, several are preserved in strong and electromagnetic
> interactions, but not in weak ones (the gravitational force has a
> negligible effect on individual particles): isospin (Iz), strangeness
> (S), charm (C), bottomness (B') and topness (T). These are the
> quantities of the most importance for classifying quarks.
>
> All quarks have B = 1/3. They also have either Iz = 1/2 or Iz = -1/2.
> Those with Iz = 1/2 are in the 'up' family, and those with Iz = -1/2 are
> in the 'down' family.
>
> Within the 'up' family, there are three quarks: the 'charm' quark (which
> has C = 1 and T = 0), the 'top' quark (which has T = 1 and C = 0), and
> the regular 'up' quark (which has C = T = 0).
>
> Within the 'down' family, there are also three quarks: the 'strange'
> quark (S = 1 and B' = 0), the 'bottom' quark (B' = 1 and S = 0), and the
> regular 'down' quark (S = B' = 0).
>
> In point of fact, the *official* names for these quarks are all just
> letters: u, d, c, s, t, b. The 'full names' (up, down, charm, strange,
> top or truth, bottom or beauty) are officially nothing more than
> mnemonics. (Note also that almost no one uses 'beauty' and 'truth'
> anymore; any working physicist will call them 'bottom' and 'top'.)
>
>
>
> There is nothing 'extra' about the six basic types of quark. The
> classification arises from deep abstract symmetries. In fact, depending
> on how you count, there may actually be 36 'different' quarks: each one
> of the six basic types comes in three 'colours' ('red', 'green', and
> 'blue', again having nothing to do with colour in everyday life but
> merely an imaginative label for an abstract property), and each one of
> those 18 comes in a 'quark' and an 'antiquark' form.
>
> Actually, *all* quarks are nothing more than theoretical, mathematical
> constructs: one has never been actually observed, and many believe one
> never *could* be. They are the mathematical 'components' of real,
> observed particles, and the only reason we use them as a model in theory
> is because they express the observed symmetries very well. Some people
> imagine that they 'really' exist, 'inside' baryons and mesons. Others
> imagine that they are merely a trick to make the equations come out
> right. The truth may lie in some combination of both these viewpoints.
>
> But there's no reason to declare that one type of quark is less 'real'
> than another. They used to only think there were u, d, c, and s, but
> that was because b and t just hadn't been discovered (or invented,
> depending on your view) yet. They are nothing whatsoever like a
> hypothesis about 'god'. They are a necessary addition to the quark model
> to explain certain classes of observed particles -- such as B mesons and
> W bosons.
>
> Given our current state of experimental knowledge about particles, there
> are either six quarks (times three colours plus antiquarks), or none.
> Four quarks simply do not suffice to describe all of the particle
> interactions that have been observed. God, on the other hand, is treated
> by physics as Laplace (I think it was) once said: 'I have no need of
> that hypothesis, sir.'
>
Beautiful.
Thank you sir.
I know you will forgive my artistic license with the mnemonics. And as
for God, everyone who breathes understands the exhilaration of
understanding and the grace of beauty and power.
Even evangelists, may god forgive them. (hohohohahaha)
(but not dubya) teheeheehe
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| FrozenNorth wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
>
>
>
> No probs here, I know my tech, but love my city, going downtown tomorrow,
> gonna party with my beautiful wife, can life get better?
> ;-)
Hmm.
I lean towards the island life myself.
but I've never been that socially integrated.
Music is what saves my XXX inna pinch.
I can play. Reproduce anything I hear.
And innovate. Harmonic and rhythmic counterpoint is my fav.
Real time transposition to random keys is my exercise.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
|
| > by neighbour I take it you mean related ISP servers?
Provincial neighbours, with a commonality of a rural and remote history...
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| ~xy~ wrote:
>
>
> Provincial neighbours, with a commonality of a rural and remote history...
>
>
Ahhh.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Spencer Spindrift wrote:
> "Musky Lure" <muskylure@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:muskylure-EC123C.15270424112006@news.zianet.com...
>
>
>
> Right click on a message. Select "properties" at the bottom. Click on the
> tab "Details" and OE shows the headers.
>
>
I'm not ever going to use OE in this life.
thanks.
what do my headers tell you?
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| BuZZard wrote:
> "michael" <yost536@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1164396877.191764.122810@l39g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> Worst thanksgiving experience for me...
> the peanut butter fudge got hidden.. like.. and I got like.. one piece..
> and today.. we get to eat it all again.. cept for the
> peanut butter fudge.
> and.. I made homemade turkey gravy.. like mom use to do..
> for the first time.. and damn. .it came out great. I bought some allready
> made.. and mine was better.
> The worst part.. prolly not having enough nugs to just.. sNoke my self
> silly.. but.. i did have some bud.
>
>
My geologist came over today and helped me with a buncha transplanting
and fertilizing. At some point in the afternoon it became apparent he
had a stash. This GOD stuff is absolutely nuts! polyploidal branching
nodes and flowers popping out at every node, even 'way 'way down on the
main stalk. The starts all rooted and most exploded out mass white
tips... Freakin' Outrageous. Supposed to be good outdoors too.
He gave me a teensy stash an I'm finally burnin one now.
You hearin new music from Canada over there Shaun?
A fellow "Leroy Stagger" is from here, Victoria. He's gotta hit song
goin off these days about it. He was a MIDI systems student of mine...
Good kid.
Happy Thanksgiving, all you down home folk.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Sean Carroll wrote:
> Spencer Spindrift wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Don't take any of this too seriously. 'Strangeness', 'charm' and
> 'beauty' in quarks have absolutely *nothing* to do with what those words
> signify in everyday life. They are abstract quantum numbers, existing in
> abstract mathematical space, that are merely given convenient and
> memorable labels.
>
> The so-called 'flavour' quantum numbers for particles include:
> - lepton number (L)
> - baryon number (B)
> - isospin (Iz)
> - strangeness (S)
> - charm (C)
> - bottomness or 'beauty' (B')
> - topness or 'truth' (T)
> - hypercharge (Y = B + S + C + B' + T)
> - electric charge (Q = Iz + Y/2)
> - weak isospin (Tz)
> - weak hypercharge (YW)
>
> Interactions through the strong force (one of the four fundamental
> forces, alongside the weak, electromagnetic, and gravitational forces)
> preserve all the flavour numbers. Two quantities are preserved in all
> interactions: the electric charge (Q) and the difference of baryon and
> lepton number (B - L).
>
> Of the rest, several are preserved in strong and electromagnetic
> interactions, but not in weak ones (the gravitational force has a
> negligible effect on individual particles): isospin (Iz), strangeness
> (S), charm (C), bottomness (B') and topness (T). These are the
> quantities of the most importance for classifying quarks.
>
> All quarks have B = 1/3. They also have either Iz = 1/2 or Iz = -1/2.
> Those with Iz = 1/2 are in the 'up' family, and those with Iz = -1/2 are
> in the 'down' family.
>
> Within the 'up' family, there are three quarks: the 'charm' quark (which
> has C = 1 and T = 0), the 'top' quark (which has T = 1 and C = 0), and
> the regular 'up' quark (which has C = T = 0).
>
> Within the 'down' family, there are also three quarks: the 'strange'
> quark (S = 1 and B' = 0), the 'bottom' quark (B' = 1 and S = 0), and the
> regular 'down' quark (S = B' = 0).
>
> In point of fact, the *official* names for these quarks are all just
> letters: u, d, c, s, t, b. The 'full names' (up, down, charm, strange,
> top or truth, bottom or beauty) are officially nothing more than
> mnemonics. (Note also that almost no one uses 'beauty' and 'truth'
> anymore; any working physicist will call them 'bottom' and 'top'.)
>
>
>
> There is nothing 'extra' about the six basic types of quark. The
> classification arises from deep abstract symmetries. In fact, depending
> on how you count, there may actually be 36 'different' quarks: each one
> of the six basic types comes in three 'colours' ('red', 'green', and
> 'blue', again having nothing to do with colour in everyday life but
> merely an imaginative label for an abstract property), and each one of
> those 18 comes in a 'quark' and an 'antiquark' form.
>
> Actually, *all* quarks are nothing more than theoretical, mathematical
> constructs: one has never been actually observed, and many believe one
> never *could* be. They are the mathematical 'components' of real,
> observed particles, and the only reason we use them as a model in theory
> is because they express the observed symmetries very well. Some people
> imagine that they 'really' exist, 'inside' baryons and mesons. Others
> imagine that they are merely a trick to make the equations come out
> right. The truth may lie in some combination of both these viewpoints.
>
> But there's no reason to declare that one type of quark is less 'real'
> than another. They used to only think there were u, d, c, and s, but
> that was because b and t just hadn't been discovered (or invented,
> depending on your view) yet. They are nothing whatsoever like a
> hypothesis about 'god'. They are a necessary addition to the quark model
> to explain certain classes of observed particles -- such as B mesons and
> W bosons.
>
> Given our current state of experimental knowledge about particles, there
> are either six quarks (times three colours plus antiquarks), or none.
> Four quarks simply do not suffice to describe all of the particle
> interactions that have been observed. God, on the other hand, is treated
> by physics as Laplace (I think it was) once said: 'I have no need of
> that hypothesis, sir.'
>
The LAC is going to incorporate gravitation into the TOE?
Are we going to get a hard value for the Riggs Boson(s)?
Is gravity's weakness related to the antimatter inequality?
Will we see dark matter?
What the heck is holding all those galaxies together?
Are we absolutely sure gravity isn't altering magnitude with distance
differently than expected?
Can we touch the dark energy?
I mean 75%?? that's an energy balance?
Which of the three telescopes to you favor?
Did they settle on Destiny?
Shouldn't there be some common explanation for these two anomalies?
perhaps gravity itself is altering density as a low number harmonic wave
function of the size of the universe? Like, stronger at cluster
magnitudes, and then at a negative value at the supercluster level?
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Mowe Z. Slowley wrote:
Higgs Boson.
silly me.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Shaun aRe 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Meat Plow" <meat@meatplow.local> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.11.24.22.11.21.177000@nntp.sun-meatplow.local...
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:47:15 -0800, BraBurner Has Frothed:
>
>
> EARTH TO BRABURNER or whatever nickname you're trolling with this hour.
She's not trolling - she meant it.
Shaun aRe
| |
| Shaun aRe 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
Kath says Thanks to you all!
',;~}~
Shaun aRe - And so do I!
| |
| Shaun aRe 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Meat Plow" <meat@meatplow.local> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.11.24.19.36.32.493000@nntp.sun-meatplow.local...
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:18:37 -0800, BraBurner Has Frothed:
>
>
> Nope, who is she?
My wife.
HTH.
Shaun aRe
| |
| Shaun aRe 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
news:d_J9h.10422$1U5.5103@edtnps90...
> BraBurner wrote:
>
> The beautiful and talented wife of Shaun Rae
> deserves all the best from all of us.
>
> an angel of patience, she stuck with the man while going through
> financial troubles this year
>
> This is a great and memorable act for posterity and a reminder
> to all misogynists that some women are beautiful both inside and out.
>
>
> Happy birthday Kathrine.
YAY!!!
',;~}~
I have to tell you for your own safety though, at this point - her name is
'Kathleen'. Better hearing that from me than her LOL!
',;~}~
Shaun aRe
| |
| Shaun aRe 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mycoloteur" <pmcdonald42@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:1164410540.828865.24910@45g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>
> BraBurner wrote:
>
> Indeed! And best birthday wishes to her.
',;~}~
She is doing various Saturday type projects today and doesn't get on the
groups much these days anyway, but I have told her of the messages. I hope
she doesn't think I'm butting in, heheheh...
Shaun aRe CHEERS!
| |
| FrozenNorth 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Mowe Z. Slowley tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
> FrozenNorth wrote:
>
>
> Hmm.
>
> I lean towards the island life myself.
> but I've never been that socially integrated.
> Music is what saves my XXX inna pinch.
>
> I can play. Reproduce anything I hear.
> And innovate. Harmonic and rhythmic counterpoint is my fav.
> Real time transposition to random keys is my exercise.
>
I wish I could live away from it all, at least part of the time, but there
is this thing called money, what I do for a living pretty much requires a
city.
--
Froz...
| |
| michael 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
Paisley Sky wrote:
> michael wrote:
>
>
> guess again
You are so good at this ...
| |
|
| > > Provincial neighbours, with a commonality of a rural and remote
history...
>
> Ahhh.
You too, as well, if I recall correctly...
~R~
| |
| Spencer Spindrift 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
news:zpN9h.11743$1U5.706@edtnps90...
> Spencer Spindrift wrote:
>
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Well, yeah; that's my point. I use lyrical poetry and artistic symbology
> as important communication tools, not to mention artistic outlet.
> Perhaps you are feeling a little left brain heavy?
>
> But: I'm curious about your 4 quark thing.
> That's quantum-electro dynamics, totally outdated for the last 20 years.
>
> They already measured the weight of the Top quark before shutting down
> the tevatron, and CERN is warming up again for the LHC...
>
> Where are you?
You mean "When am I." Apparently 20 years out of date if you are right.
I cannot be bothered keeping up with particle physics since I stopped
believing in Time.
The universe seems to be beyond human understanding. I don't think there
will ever be a GUT and bringing god into it only replaces one mystery with
an even bigger one. For me it all makes sense when you realise that time is
an illusion to prevent us from percieving everything at once.
When seen from the 5th dimension, like on Salvia, the world is a 4D solid
and nothing moves.
Spencer
| |
| Spencer Spindrift 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
news:3%S9h.6060$p9.2066@edtnps82...
> Spencer Spindrift wrote:
> I'm not ever going to use OE in this life.
> thanks.
>
> what do my headers tell you?
Path:
uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps82.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20060926
Debian/1.7.8-1sarge7.3.1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.drugs.psychedelics,alt.drugs.pot,alt.buzzard.rules
Well so far so obvious.
Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Kath aRe
References: <1164392316.954288.239490@14g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
<EOOdndzyGsvD3PrYnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@qcislands.net>
<1164395518.127068.84550@14g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
<1164395692.329219.93810@14g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
<uPI9h.10413$1U5.4502@edtnps90>
<JpudnZlTcdqx__rYnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@qcislands.net> <tsJ9h.272$Hp3.47@clgrps13>
<7O2dnfXrG7dR-frYnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@qcislands.net>
<PWJ9h.10421$1U5.3809@edtnps90>
<xNqdnWSLouxu8frYnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@qcislands.net>
<muskylure-EC123C.15270424112006@news.zianet.com>
<4spf8oF10rcbpU1@mid.individual.net>
In-Reply-To: <4spf8oF10rcbpU1@mid.individual.net>
Don't ask me!
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <3%S9h.6060$p9.2066@edtnps82>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:18:07 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.180.92.169
X-Trace: edtnps82 1164442687 64.180.92.169 (Sat, 25 Nov 2006 01:18:07 MST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 01:18:07 MST
alt.buzzard.rules:85733
Plain text 7 bit ascii, 43 line message. date and time. Your host IP number.
I use uni-berlin.de ...
XXXX it, I could look it all up if I cared
| |
| BuZZard 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
|
"Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
news:9eT9h.4119$Hp3.440@clgrps13...
> BuZZard wrote:
allready[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> My geologist came over today and helped me with a buncha transplanting
> and fertilizing. At some point in the afternoon it became apparent he
> had a stash. This GOD stuff is absolutely nuts! polyploidal branching
> nodes and flowers popping out at every node, even 'way 'way down on the
> main stalk. The starts all rooted and most exploded out mass white
> tips... Freakin' Outrageous. Supposed to be good outdoors too.
>
> He gave me a teensy stash an I'm finally burnin one now.
>
> You hearin new music from Canada over there Shaun?
> A fellow "Leroy Stagger" is from here, Victoria. He's gotta hit song
> goin off these days about it. He was a MIDI systems student of mine...
>
> Good kid.
>
>
> Happy Thanksgiving, all you down home folk.
> --
> God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
I am in the beginning stages of making a grow room....
So far, I got seeds.. my next step.. real good soil.. and nutrients..
when I have this.. I will get a light.. or two.. and by this time next
year.. I Hope to have my first indoor crop... if the force be with me.
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| FrozenNorth wrote:
> Mowe Z. Slowley tossed the following at the wall, and it stuck:
>
>
>
> I wish I could live away from it all, at least part of the time, but there
> is this thing called money, what I do for a living pretty much requires a
> city.
>
Yeah, I hear ya.
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Spencer Spindrift wrote:
> "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
> news:zpN9h.11743$1U5.706@edtnps90...
>
>
>
>
>
> You mean "When am I." Apparently 20 years out of date if you are right.
> I cannot be bothered keeping up with particle physics since I stopped
> believing in Time.
> The universe seems to be beyond human understanding. I don't think there
> will ever be a GUT and bringing god into it only replaces one mystery with
> an even bigger one. For me it all makes sense when you realise that time is
> an illusion to prevent us from percieving everything at once.
> When seen from the 5th dimension, like on Salvia, the world is a 4D solid
> and nothing moves.
>
> Spencer
>
>
You've seen it?
Colorful place, eh?
Well, At least the living...
--
God is coming soon to a planet near YOU!
| |
| Mowe Z. Slowley 2006-12-06, 10:06 pm |
| Spencer Spindrift wrote:
> "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org> wrote in message
> news:3%S9h.6060$p9.2066@edtnps82...
>
>
>
> Path:
> uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps82.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> From: "Mowe Z. Slowley" <slowley@TreeEnt.org>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20060926
> Debian/1.7.8-1sarge7.3.1
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Newsgroups: alt.drugs.psychedelics,alt.drugs | | |