|
Home > Archive > Recovery aa > October 2004 > Just for you Ralph
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Just for you Ralph
|
|
|
| Hunter Thompson rant:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?C59A252A9
Did you see Bush on TV, trying to debate? Jesus, he talked like a donkey
with no brains at all. The tide turned early, in Coral Gables, when Bush
went belly up less than halfway through his first bout with Kerry, who
hammered poor George into jelly. It was pitiful. . . . I almost felt
sorry for him, until I heard someone call him "Mister President," and
then I felt ashamed.
| |
| cadman@wits.end 2004-10-28, 11:06 am |
| ".... In four short years he has turned our country from a prosperous
nation at peace into a desperately indebted nation at war. But so what?
He is the President of the United States, and you're not. Love it or
leave it."
Gotta love the good Doctor's grasp of THE REAL...
| |
| Positively 62nd Street 2004-10-29, 2:06 am |
| Wow.
Never short on words, is he?
Here's an interesting note...
Out of all the lines on that page (and there sure are many)... I copied the
exact same line as Tom did to post back here with. Heh. Maybe many of us
*do* get it.
--
"Kill for money... Die for love... Whatever was
God thinking of???"
Bruce Cockburn
"F.H." <connectu2z@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:oCZfd.4598$jD4.4557@trnddc06...
> Hunter Thompson rant:
>
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?C59A252A9
>
> Did you see Bush on TV, trying to debate? Jesus, he talked like a donkey
> with no brains at all. The tide turned early, in Coral Gables, when Bush
> went belly up less than halfway through his first bout with Kerry, who
> hammered poor George into jelly. It was pitiful. . . . I almost felt
> sorry for him, until I heard someone call him "Mister President," and
> then I felt ashamed.
| |
|
|
| Positively 62nd Street 2004-10-29, 7:07 pm |
|
"F.H." <connectu2z@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:tGlgd.7704$8W6.3357@trnddc05...
> Positively 62nd Street wrote:
the[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Indeed. Here it is spelled out nicely: (Long but worth it)
>
>
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/m...5070&oref=login
>
> If it doesn't wrap:
>
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q1C1215A9
Excellent article. I guess the thing that's so confounding is that the more
folks get to understand what he's all about... the less some of those same
people care. There is a feeling among radical rights that 'yes he's a nut
case and a zealot' that they don't agree with, but 'hey, once a Republican
always a Republican no matter the consequences'. The party is considerably
more important to these people than what it is doing and as long as what it
is doing is keeping all challengers under thumb, then so be it. How else, in
the face of all that we now know about what is going on in this
administration, is it possible for so many to blindly support it?
An internal house cleaning in the Republican party after the election? I
doubt it. These folks are as addicted to the party's power as he is to his
church's.
--
"Kill for money... Die for love... Whatever was
God thinking of???"
Bruce Cockburn
| |
|
| Positively 62nd Street wrote:
> "F.H." <connectu2z@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:tGlgd.7704$8W6.3357@trnddc05...
>
>
> the
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/m...5070&oref=login
>
>
>
> Excellent article. I guess the thing that's so confounding is that the more
> folks get to understand what he's all about... the less some of those same
> people care. There is a feeling among radical rights that 'yes he's a nut
> case and a zealot' that they don't agree with, but 'hey, once a Republican
> always a Republican no matter the consequences'. The party is considerably
> more important to these people than what it is doing and as long as what it
> is doing is keeping all challengers under thumb, then so be it. How else, in
> the face of all that we now know about what is going on in this
> administration, is it possible for so many to blindly support it?
>
> An internal house cleaning in the Republican party after the election? I
> doubt it. These folks are as addicted to the party's power as he is to his
> church's.
Ever wonder if the whole born again thing is just schtick to sucker
large blocks of voters and camouflage the actions of the military
industrial complex and the Globalist Projects, (WTO: accelerated
integration of capital, production, and markets globally, a process
driven by the logic of corporate profitability)? Sure were a lot of
heads turned the other way (Congress) when the snake oil man came to
town. Can they all really be *that* gullible?
|
| |
|
|