Recovery aa - Fridays Question of the day

Author

Fridays Question of the day

Ted F.

2004-10-22, 11:06 am

Who said, there will be no casualties in Iraq?

http://tinyurl.com/4fsel

Ted F.

rosie readandpost

2004-10-22, 11:06 am

--
" i warned him about this war. i had deep misgivings about this war.
mr. president, you had better prepare the american people for
casualties."
the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any
casualties."
..................................................rev.pat robinson
10-19-04

Fred Exley

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

" rosie readandpost" <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FN8ed.27$T02.25@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>

>
> --
> " i warned him about this war. i had deep misgivings about this war.
> mr. president, you had better prepare the american people for
> casualties."
> the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any
> casualties."
> .................................................rev.pat robinson
> 10-19-04

The White House denies this conversation took place. I find that more
credible than Pat Robinson. Bush often says idiotic things, but c'mon
Rosie, the above is beyond credibility.

-Fred

F.H.

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

Fred Exley wrote:

> " rosie readandpost" <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:FN8ed.27$T02.25@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>
>
>
> The White House denies this conversation took place. I find that more
> credible than Pat Robinson. Bush often says idiotic things, but c'mon
> Rosie, the above is beyond credibility.
>
> -Fred

Beyond credibility? Maybe by your criteria for credibility. Seems easy
to push the cognitive dissonance button. Think about it. Go back to
the other quotes: "XXXX Saddam" "He's outta there" "Mission
Accomplished" "Shock and Awe." So we have that mind set established,
and Robertson who is a supporter and confidant of Bush on one hand and
the Karen Hughs, Scott McClellan et al. spin factory on the other.

No brainer IMO. This ain't a first, its a recurring theme. Do you
remember the term "Mayberry Machiavelli's"?

http://www.rense.com/general32/shut.htm

Mark Warner

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

Fred Exley wrote:
> " rosie readandpost" wrote
>
> The White House denies this conversation took place. I find that more
> credible than Pat Robinson. Bush often says idiotic things, but c'mon
> Rosie, the above is beyond credibility.

Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and she'll
believe it. And Frank will tell you that the corporate owned media are
suppressing the story.

--
Mark Warner
lose .inhibitions when replying

F.H.

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

Mark Warner wrote:

> Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and she'll
> believe it. And Frank will tell you that the corporate owned media are
> suppressing the story.

Believe Rupert. He has an excellent plan for all of us in the supply
side New World Order. Favorable positions for those with the unique
trait of blind faith.

Fred Exley

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

"F.H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:Q0bed.27$jD4.20@trnddc06...
> Fred Exley wrote:
>
>
> Beyond credibility? Maybe by your criteria for credibility. Seems easy
> to push the cognitive dissonance button. Think about it. Go back to the
> other quotes: "XXXX Saddam" "He's outta there" "Mission Accomplished"
> "Shock and Awe." So we have that mind set established, and Robertson who
> is a supporter and confidant of Bush on one hand and the Karen Hughs,
> Scott McClellan et al. spin factory on the other.
>
> No brainer IMO. This ain't a first, its a recurring theme. Do you
> remember the term "Mayberry Machiavelli's"?
>
> http://www.rense.com/general32/shut.htm

Why are you changing the subject? The subject was not Bush's 'mind set', or
a 'recurring theme', but Pat Robinson's claim that Bush said "Oh, no, we're
not going to have any casualties." Consider the source, the motivation, and
the timing please. No brainer IMO either.

-Fred

F.H.

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

Fred Exley wrote:
> "F.H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:Q0bed.27$jD4.20@trnddc06...
>
>
>
>
> Why are you changing the subject? The subject was not Bush's 'mind set', or
> a 'recurring theme', but Pat Robinson's claim that Bush said "Oh, no, we're
> not going to have any casualties." Consider the source, the motivation, and
> the timing please. No brainer IMO either.
>
> -Fred

LOL, his mind set has nothing to do with what he might have said. Stay
away from race tracks Fred.

rosie readandpost

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

: The White House denies this conversation took place. I find that
more
: credible than Pat Robinson. Bush often says idiotic things, but
c'mon
: Rosie, the above is beyond credibility.
:
: -Fred
:

LOL! of course the white house denied
this............................as you mentioned bush DOES say
idiotic things, this is just another one of those!
VERY believable!
btw, what is the punishment for implying that MR. CHRISTIAN
CONSERVATIVE ROBINSON is lying?

--
" i warned him about this war. i had deep misgivings about this war.
mr. president, you had better prepare the american people for
casualties."
the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any
casualties."
..................................................rev.pat robinson
10-19-04

"Fred Exley" <fexly221@msn.com> wrote in message
news:10nica4bjt6kq9c@corp.supernews.com...
:
: " rosie readandpost" <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote in
message
: news:FN8ed.27$T02.25@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
: >

: >
: > --
: > " i warned him about this war. i had deep misgivings about this
war.
: > mr. president, you had better prepare the american people for
: > casualties."
: > the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have
any
: > casualties."
: > .................................................rev.pat
robinson
: > 10-19-04
:
: The White House denies this conversation took place. I find that
more
: credible than Pat Robinson. Bush often says idiotic things, but
c'mon
: Rosie, the above is beyond credibility.
:
: -Fred
:
:

rosie readandpost

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

: Mark Warner wrote:
:
: > Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and
she'll
: > believe it

ROTFLMAO!
i doubt he would know how, without some prompting!
(thanks for reposting this FH)

--
" i warned him about this war. i had deep misgivings about this war.
mr. president, you had better prepare the american people for
casualties."
the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any
casualties."
..................................................rev.pat robinson
10-19-04

"F.H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ogbed.46$8W6.7@trnddc05...
: Mark Warner wrote:
:
: > Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and
she'll
: > believe it. And Frank will tell you that the corporate owned
media are
: > suppressing the story.
:
: Believe Rupert. He has an excellent plan for all of us in the
supply
: side New World Order. Favorable positions for those with the
unique
: trait of blind faith.

Kai R

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

rosie readandpost wrote:

> : Mark Warner wrote:
> :
> : > Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and
> she'll
> : > believe it
>
>
> ROTFLMAO!
> i doubt he would know how, without some prompting!
> (thanks for reposting this FH)
>

Hey Mark, did you notice the subtle way she told you're in her
killfile? You're history, man.

Kai

Fred Exley

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

"F.H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:aFbed.197$5O4.90@trnddc07...
> Fred Exley wrote:
>
> LOL, his mind set has nothing to do with what he might have said. Stay
> away from race tracks Fred.

Well, there you go again, changing the subject. But yes, if by 'his mind
set' you meant Robinson's, and 'has nothing to do with what he might have
said' you meant Bush, we agree.

One reason I engage in these seemingly pointless debates, especially early
in the morning, is that the astoundingly specious replies really get my
adrenaline pumped up, which gets me in the mood for a long bike ride. This
morning, "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!"

-Fred

David M

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

Fred Exley wrote:

> The subject was not Bush's 'mind set', or a 'recurring theme',
> but Pat Robinson's claim that Bush said "Oh, no, we're not
> going to have any casualties." Consider the source, the
> motivation, and the timing please. No brainer IMO either.

Considering the source, the motivation, and the timing, what we
have here is a logical dilemma, Fred. One them clearly is
lying.

But, on the one hand: Why would Pat Robertson, a much admired
fundamentalist minister of God who know that liars burn in
eternal fire lie about a President he ardently supports?

And, on the other: Why would a politician in a neck-and-neck
race for re-election lie about something he wishes he hadn't
said?

It is just too close to call! ;-)

F.H.

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

Fred Exley wrote:

> One reason I engage in these seemingly pointless debates, especially early
> in the morning, is that the astoundingly specious replies really get my
> adrenaline pumped up, which gets me in the mood for a long bike ride. This
> morning, "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!"

Mark gets "pumped up" also, but he just goes down and gets an O'Doul's.

Cognitive Dissonance revisited:

Cognitive dissonance is a psychological phenomenon which refers to the
discomfort felt (see adrenaline) at a discrepancy between what you
already know or believe, and new information or interpretation. It
therefore occurs when there is a need to accommodate new ideas.

Assimilation and Accommodation:

Assimilation and Accommodation are the two complementary processes of
Adaptation described by Piaget, through which awareness of the outside
world is internalized. Although one may predominate at any one moment,
they are inseparable and exist in a dialectical relationship.

In Assimilation, what is perceived in the outside world is incorporated
into the internal world without changing the structure of that internal
world, but potentially at the cost of "squeezing" the external
perceptions to fit — hence pigeon-holing and stereotyping.

If you are familiar with databases, you can think of it this way: your
mind has its database already built, with its fields and categories
already defined. If it comes across new information which fits into
those fields, it can assimilate it without any trouble.

Fred Exley

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

"David M" <dhmce@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:2tt3d3F242ig2U1@uni-berlin.de...
> Fred Exley wrote:
>
>
> Considering the source, the motivation, and the timing, what we
> have here is a logical dilemma, Fred. One them clearly is
> lying.
>
> But, on the one hand: Why would Pat Robertson, a much admired
> fundamentalist minister of God who know that liars burn in
> eternal fire lie about a President he ardently supports?
>
> And, on the other: Why would a politician in a neck-and-neck
> race for re-election lie about something he wishes he hadn't
> said?
>
> It is just too close to call! ;-)

Maybe nobody's lying. Pat Robertson probably heard him incorrectly. Nobody
else in attendance remembers it that way.

"The Lord told me it was going to be A, a disaster, and B, messy" -Pat
Robertson
Pat Robertson probably heard him incorrectly too. But, if this man is
credible, shouldn't we all forget about Bush or Kerry and vote for HIM?

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/2858681

-Fred

Fred Exley

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

"F.H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:Ncded.101$dW.85@trnddc08...
> Fred Exley wrote:
>
>
> Mark gets "pumped up" also, but he just goes down and gets an O'Doul's.
>
> Cognitive Dissonance revisited:
>
> Cognitive dissonance is a psychological phenomenon which refers to the
> discomfort felt (see adrenaline) at a discrepancy between what you already
> know or believe, and new information or interpretation. It therefore
> occurs when there is a need to accommodate new ideas.
>
> Assimilation and Accommodation:
>
> Assimilation and Accommodation are the two complementary processes of
> Adaptation described by Piaget, through which awareness of the outside
> world is internalized. Although one may predominate at any one moment,
> they are inseparable and exist in a dialectical relationship.
>
> In Assimilation, what is perceived in the outside world is incorporated
> into the internal world without changing the structure of that internal
> world, but potentially at the cost of "squeezing" the external perceptions
> to fit — hence pigeon-holing and stereotyping.
>
> If you are familiar with databases, you can think of it this way: your
> mind has its database already built, with its fields and categories
> already defined. If it comes across new information which fits into those
> fields, it can assimilate it without any trouble.

Thank you doctor, for that astoundingly specious diagnosis! My mental
database does have fields defined to accomodate the ideas sometimes put
forth here, but they don't get past the referential integrity check!
-Fred

F.H.

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

Fred Exley wrote:

> Thank you doctor, for that astoundingly specious diagnosis! My mental
> database does have fields defined to accomodate the ideas sometimes put
> forth here, but they don't get past the referential integrity check!

Right! I rest my case.

David M

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

Fred Exley wrote:

> Nobody else in attendance remembers it that way.

Bush, Karl Rove, and Robertson were supposedly the only ones
there.

> Pat Robertson probably heard him incorrectly too. But, if
> this man is credible, shouldn't we all forget about Bush or
> Kerry and vote for HIM?

That would be blasphemy. Robertson and Bush both know God has
picked Dubya to win the election.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRI.../19/pzn.01.html

Ted F.

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:55:58 -0500, "David M" <dhmce@insightbb.com>
wrote:

>Fred Exley wrote:
>
>
>Considering the source, the motivation, and the timing, what we
>have here is a logical dilemma, Fred. One them clearly is
>lying.
>
>But, on the one hand: Why would Pat Robertson, a much admired
>fundamentalist minister of God who know that liars burn in
>eternal fire lie about a President he ardently supports?
>
>And, on the other: Why would a politician in a neck-and-neck
>race for re-election lie about something he wishes he hadn't
>said?
>
>It is just too close to call! ;-)

I wonder if Bush remembers reading My Pet Goat while Rome burned?

The same intelligence (and I use that word very lightly) sources that
told him there were WMD, probably told him they would be in and out
like Flynn and there would be no casualties. Maybe Iraq is just a
little bit pregnant.

Ted F.

>

Ted F.

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:09:17 -0700, "Fred Exley" <fexly221@msn.com>
wrote:

>
>" rosie readandpost" <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:FN8ed.27$T02.25@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>
>The White House denies this conversation took place. I find that more
>credible than Pat Robinson. Bush often says idiotic things, but c'mon
>Rosie, the above is beyond credibility.

Of course they denied it. Admitting he said it would only draw
attention to the Presidents stupidity.

Ted F.

>
>-Fred
>

Mark Warner

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

Kai R wrote:
> rosie readandpost wrote:
>
>
> Hey Mark, did you notice the subtle way she told you're in her
> killfile? You're history, man.

Yeah. I'm crushed.

--
Mark Warner
lose .inhibitions when replying

Grace H.

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

in article 10niftem0od1t41@corp.supernews.com, Fred Exley at
fexly221@msn.com wrote on 10/22/04 10:13 AM:

>
> Why are you changing the subject? The subject was not Bush's 'mind set', or
> a 'recurring theme', but Pat Robinson's claim that Bush said "Oh, no, we're
> not going to have any casualties." Consider the source, the motivation, and
> the timing please. No brainer IMO either.
>
> -Fred
>
>
Well, I am no fan of Pat Robertson, but at this point I'll believe him over
Bush, who seems to be coming apart at the seams :-) Face it, Fred, your hero
is bug-XXX nuts.

Grace H.

2004-10-22, 7:06 pm

in article 10nica4bjt6kq9c@corp.supernews.com, Fred Exley at
fexly221@msn.com wrote on 10/22/04 9:09 AM:

>
> " rosie readandpost" <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:FN8ed.27$T02.25@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>
> The White House denies this conversation took place. I find that more
> credible than Pat Robinson. Bush often says idiotic things, but c'mon
> Rosie, the above is beyond credibility.
>
> -Fred
>
>
And you believe the White House? Don't forget that they lied about WMDs and
they can lie about this. Rember, Bushleague also said we are on a "modern
Crusade". A man who can make a grandiose and inflammatory statement like
that is certainly capable of stating that there will be no casualties.
Gawd - not only is he incredibly stupid, he is also crazy!

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

Ted F. wrote:
|| Who said, there will be no casualties in Iraq?
||
|| http://tinyurl.com/4fsel
||
|| Ted F.

Who said thay your brain didn't die in childbirth?

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

Mark Warner wrote:
|| Fred Exley wrote:
||| " rosie readandpost" wrote
||||
|||| " i warned him about this war. i had deep misgivings about this
|||| war. mr. president, you had better prepare the american people for
|||| casualties."
|||| the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any
|||| casualties."
|||| .................................................rev.pat robinson
|||| 10-19-04
|||
||| The White House denies this conversation took place. I find that
||| more credible than Pat Robinson. Bush often says idiotic things,
||| but c'mon Rosie, the above is beyond credibility.
||
|| Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and she'll
|| believe it. And Frank will tell you that the corporate owned media
|| are suppressing the story.

Well, they often DO suppress pro-Bush material.

||
|| --
|| Mark Warner
|| lose .inhibitions when replying

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

F.H. wrote:
|| Mark Warner wrote:
||
||| Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and she'll
||| believe it. And Frank will tell you that the corporate owned media
||| are suppressing the story.
||
|| Believe Rupert. He has an excellent plan for all of us in the supply
|| side New World Order. Favorable positions for those with the unique
|| trait of blind faith.

I got a good job FOR YOU in the New World Order: personally plumbing Old
Faithful.

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

Kai R wrote:
|| rosie readandpost wrote:
||
|||| Mark Warner wrote:
||||
||||| Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and
||||| she'll believe it
|||
|||
||| ROTFLMAO!
||| i doubt he would know how, without some prompting!
||| (thanks for reposting this FH)
|||
||
|| Hey Mark, did you notice the subtle way she told you're in her
|| killfile? You're history, man.
||
|| Kai

You're LIEbral toast, baby!!!

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

Mark Warner wrote:
|| Kai R wrote:
||| rosie readandpost wrote:
|||
||||| Mark Warner wrote:
|||||
|||||| Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and
|||||| she'll believe it
||||
||||
|||| ROTFLMAO!
|||| i doubt he would know how, without some prompting!
|||| (thanks for reposting this FH)
||||
|||
||| Hey Mark, did you notice the subtle way she told you're in her
||| killfile? You're history, man.
||
||
|| Yeah. I'm crushed.

Not as bad as those crushed by Rosie's hero, Saddam, in his garbage
compactors.

||
|| --
|| Mark Warner
|| lose .inhibitions when replying

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

David M wrote:
|| Fred Exley wrote:
||
||| The subject was not Bush's 'mind set', or a 'recurring theme',
||| but Pat Robinson's claim that Bush said "Oh, no, we're not
||| going to have any casualties." Consider the source, the
||| motivation, and the timing please. No brainer IMO either.
||
|| Considering the source, the motivation, and the timing, what we
|| have here is a logical dilemma, Fred. One them clearly is
|| lying.
||
|| But, on the one hand: Why would Pat Robertson, a much admired
|| fundamentalist minister of God who know that liars burn in
|| eternal fire lie about a President he ardently supports?
||
|| And, on the other: Why would a politician in a neck-and-neck
|| race for re-election lie about something he wishes he hadn't
|| said?
||

Or, why, would an honorable? LIEbrawl lie to secure himself the presidency?

|| It is just too close to call! ;-)

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

David M wrote:
|| Fred Exley wrote:
||
||| Nobody else in attendance remembers it that way.
||
|| Bush, Karl Rove, and Robertson were supposedly the only ones
|| there.
||
||| Pat Robertson probably heard him incorrectly too. But, if
||| this man is credible, shouldn't we all forget about Bush or
||| Kerry and vote for HIM?
||
|| That would be blasphemy. Robertson and Bush both know God has
|| picked Dubya to win the election.

Plus TENS OF MILLIONS of Americans, too.

||
|| http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRI.../19/pzn.01.html

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

Ted F. wrote:
|| On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:55:58 -0500, "David M" <dhmce@insightbb.com>
|| wrote:
||
||| Fred Exley wrote:
|||
|||| The subject was not Bush's 'mind set', or a 'recurring theme',
|||| but Pat Robinson's claim that Bush said "Oh, no, we're not
|||| going to have any casualties." Consider the source, the
|||| motivation, and the timing please. No brainer IMO either.
|||
||| Considering the source, the motivation, and the timing, what we
||| have here is a logical dilemma, Fred. One them clearly is
||| lying.
|||
||| But, on the one hand: Why would Pat Robertson, a much admired
||| fundamentalist minister of God who know that liars burn in
||| eternal fire lie about a President he ardently supports?
|||
||| And, on the other: Why would a politician in a neck-and-neck
||| race for re-election lie about something he wishes he hadn't
||| said?
|||
||| It is just too close to call! ;-)
||
|| I wonder if Bush remembers reading My Pet Goat while Rome burned?
||
|| The same intelligence (and I use that word very lightly) sources that
|| told him there were WMD, probably told him they would be in and out
|| like Flynn and there would be no casualties. Maybe Iraq is just a
|| little bit pregnant.
||
|| Ted F.

Perhaps you are just a wee bit sentient.

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

Grace H. wrote:
|| in article 10niftem0od1t41@corp.supernews.com, Fred Exley at
|| fexly221@msn.com wrote on 10/22/04 10:13 AM:
||
|||
||| Why are you changing the subject? The subject was not Bush's 'mind
||| set', or a 'recurring theme', but Pat Robinson's claim that Bush
||| said "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties." Consider
||| the source, the motivation, and the timing please. No brainer IMO
||| either.
|||
||| -Fred
|||
|||
|| Well, I am no fan of Pat Robertson, but at this point I'll believe

You'll believe ANYONE who says what you want to believe in order to continue
your obsessions.

|| him over Bush, who seems to be coming apart at the seams :-) Face
|| it, Fred, your hero is bug-XXX nuts.

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

Grace H. wrote:
|| in article 10nica4bjt6kq9c@corp.supernews.com, Fred Exley at
|| fexly221@msn.com wrote on 10/22/04 9:09 AM:
||
|||
||| " rosie readandpost" <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote in
||| message news:FN8ed.27$T02.25@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
||||

||||
|||| --
|||| " i warned him about this war. i had deep misgivings about this
|||| war. mr. president, you had better prepare the american people for
|||| casualties."
|||| the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any
|||| casualties."
|||| .................................................rev.pat robinson
|||| 10-19-04
|||
||| The White House denies this conversation took place. I find that
||| more credible than Pat Robinson. Bush often says idiotic things,
||| but c'mon Rosie, the above is beyond credibility.
|||
||| -Fred
|||
|||
|| And you believe the White House? Don't forget that they lied about
|| WMDs and they can lie about this. Rember, Bushleague also said we
|| are on a "modern Crusade". A man who can make a grandiose and
|| inflammatory statement like that is certainly capable of stating
|| that there will be no casualties. Gawd - not only is he incredibly
|| stupid, he is also crazy!

Look in the mirror and say that...about yourself. More here would believe
that about YOU.

dorsal

2004-10-23, 2:06 am

Ted F. wrote:
|| On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:09:17 -0700, "Fred Exley" <fexly221@msn.com>
|| wrote:
||
|||
||| " rosie readandpost" <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote in
||| message news:FN8ed.27$T02.25@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
||||

||||
|||| --
|||| " i warned him about this war. i had deep misgivings about this
|||| war. mr. president, you had better prepare the american people for
|||| casualties."
|||| the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any
|||| casualties."
|||| .................................................rev.pat robinson
|||| 10-19-04
|||
||| The White House denies this conversation took place. I find that
||| more credible than Pat Robinson. Bush often says idiotic things,
||| but c'mon Rosie, the above is beyond credibility.
||
|| Of course they denied it. Admitting he said it would only draw
|| attention to the Presidents stupidity.
||
|| Ted F.

Dubya is STILL president and YOU are STILL dickall.

||
||
||
||
|||
||| -Fred

Lech K. Lesiak

2004-10-23, 7:06 pm

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Mark Warner wrote:

> Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and she'll
> believe it. And Frank will tell you that the corporate owned media are
> suppressing the story

Well, this the first I've heard of it, so they much be.

Cheers,
Lech

Tommy

2004-10-23, 7:06 pm

Lech K. Lesiak <> quoted
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Mark Warner wrote:

[vbcol=seagreen]
> Well, this the first I've heard of it, so they much be.

> Cheers,
> Lech

Oh they are, and it wasn't a goat - it was a turkey. He's not what they
call too bright, the busheyed fella.

We have newswatch over here. It's a little bit like neighbourhood watch.
They employ ex-pat foreigners to keep an eye on the foreign American media.

How do you know when a yankee journalist is lying -
his mouth is moving :-))
Cheers
Yommy

dorsal

2004-10-24, 2:06 am

Tommy wrote:
|| Lech K. Lesiak <> quoted
||| On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Mark Warner wrote:
||
|||| Tell rosie that GWB XXXXed a goat at the Lincoln Memorial and
|||| she'll believe it. And Frank will tell you that the corporate
|||| owned media are suppressing the story
||
||| Well, this the first I've heard of it, so they much be.
||
||| Cheers,
||| Lech
||
||
|| Oh they are, and it wasn't a goat - it was a turkey. He's not what
|| they call too bright, the busheyed fella.

Compared to YOU, he's a genius.

||
||
|| We have newswatch over here. It's a little bit like neighbourhood
|| watch. They employ ex-pat foreigners to keep an eye on the foreign
|| American media.
||
|| How do you know when a yankee journalist is lying -
|| his mouth is moving :-))
|| Cheers
|| Yommy

Tom

2004-10-24, 11:06 am

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:39:17 -0600, "Lech K. Lesiak"
<lklesiak@calcna.ab.ca> wrote:

>On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, F.H. wrote:
>
>
>Interesting. When I go down, I usually end up with something else.
>
>Cheers,
>Muff-diving Lech

Cock breath?

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

F.H.

2004-10-24, 10:06 pm

Lech K. Lesiak wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, F.H. wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Interesting. When I go down, I usually end up with something else.

Flammable mustache?

dorsal

2004-10-25, 2:06 am

Lech K. Lesiak wrote:
|| On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, F.H. wrote:
||
||| Mark gets "pumped up" also, but he just goes down and gets an
||| O'Doul's.
||
|| Interesting. When I go down, I usually end up with something else.
||

Fish breath?

|| Cheers,
|| Muff-diving Lech

dorsal

2004-10-25, 2:06 am

Mark Warner wrote:
|| Lech K. Lesiak wrote:
||| F.H. wrote:
||||
|||| Mark gets "pumped up" also, but he just goes down and gets an
|||| O'Doul's.
|||
||| Interesting. When I go down, I usually end up with something else.
||
|| Finny would be proud.

Encore! Encore!

||
|| --
|| Mark Warner
|| lose .inhibitions when replying

dorsal

2004-10-25, 2:06 am

Tom wrote:
|| On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:39:17 -0600, "Lech K. Lesiak"
|| <lklesiak@calcna.ab.ca> wrote:
||
||| On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, F.H. wrote:
|||
|||| Mark gets "pumped up" also, but he just goes down and gets an
|||| O'Doul's.
|||
||| Interesting. When I go down, I usually end up with something else.
|||
||| Cheers,
||| Muff-diving Lech
||
|| Cock breath?

Ayeeuuuupppp!

||
||
_______________________________________________________________________________
|| Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
|| http://www.uncensored-news.com <><><><><><><> The
|| Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

F.H.

2004-10-25, 2:06 am

dorsal wrote:

> Lech K. Lesiak wrote:

> || Interesting. When I go down, I usually end up with something else.

> Fish breath?

Personal experience?

Tara

2004-10-25, 11:06 am

"F.H." wrote:
>
> dorsal wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Personal experience?

not bloody likely.

Tara

F.H.

2004-10-25, 7:07 pm

Tara wrote:

> "F.H." wrote:

[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
> not bloody likely.

I was referring to his........er...........taste? in partners. ;)

dorsal

2004-10-25, 10:06 pm

Tara wrote:
|| "F.H." wrote:
|||
||| dorsal wrote:
|||
|||| Lech K. Lesiak wrote:
|||
|||||| Interesting. When I go down, I usually end up with something
|||||| else.
|||
|||| Fish breath?
|||
||| Personal experience?
||
|| not bloody likely.
||
|| Tara

Smells like fish, tastes like chicken!!

F.H.

2004-10-25, 10:06 pm

dorsal wrote:

> Tara wrote:
> || "F.H." wrote:
> |||
> ||| dorsal wrote:
> |||
> |||| Lech K. Lesiak wrote:
> |||
> |||||| Interesting. When I go down, I usually end up with something
> |||||| else.
> |||
> |||| Fish breath?
> |||
> ||| Personal experience?
> ||
> || not bloody likely.
> ||
> || Tara
>
> Smells like fish, tastes like chicken!!

You're not supposed to swallow it stupid!

Fred Exley

2004-10-26, 7:09 pm

F.H.

2004-10-26, 7:09 pm

Fred Exley

2004-10-26, 7:09 pm

" rosie readandpost" <readandpost@yahooORhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FN8ed.27$T02.25@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>

Fred Exley

2004-10-26, 7:09 pm

F.H.

2004-10-26, 10:06 pm

Tom

2004-10-28, 11:06 am

Tommy

2004-10-29, 7:07 pm

dorsal

2004-10-29, 7:07 pm

F.H.

2004-10-29, 7:07 pm